Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
It doesn't look that way at all, dope.[/QUOTETrump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
I disagree. It does appear surveillance of some kind was ordered.
It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
It doesn't look that way at all, dope.[/QUOTETrump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
I disagree. It does appear surveillance of some kind was ordered.
OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
No.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
So you do think your Obama deployed his Russian spies....huhNo.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
I think Trump's people, ( and apparently you as well), aren't savvy enough to know that these types of communications have been monitored for decades.
So you do think your Obama deployed his Russian spies....huhNo.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
I think Trump's people, ( and apparently you as well), aren't savvy enough to know that these types of communications have been monitored for decades.
Check your fear....So you do think your Obama deployed his Russian spies....huhNo.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
I think Trump's people, ( and apparently you as well), aren't savvy enough to know that these types of communications have been monitored for decades.
I think you're retarded.
All Levin did was read DIRECT quotes from the NYTs and other radical LIB Trump hating news outlets.The media is doing the usual deflection. Focus on stupid crap to avoid looking at the serious problem.
Looks like the Obama administration was more interested in spying on citizens and allies than on enemies. No wonder he was pushing for Hillary to win. He knew she'd cover this up.
“The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.
By the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.”
There’s more. All those Democrat accusations of Russians ‘hacking our election’? Guess what:
“Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.
“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction,….”
In other words they can do it but leave behind footprints that lead to Russia and not to the (Obama) CIA.
Believe it or not that’s still not the worst of it. Anyone ever call you paranoid because you’re afraid all these new ‘smart devices’ may be a bit too smart and can be used as spying instruments? Well your paranoia was justified:
“Among the various techniques profiled by WikiLeaks is “Weeping Angel”, developed by the CIA’s Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In ‘Fake-Off’ mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server.”
Wikileaks drops BOMBSHELL about "Russian" hacking
"This new scandal is titled as “Obamagate.” WikiLeaks revealed that Obama has made quite the history of wiretapping and hacking political opponents and friends alike. What a bombshell!!!
WikiLeaks made a list of all of Obama’s wire taps:
– The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
– Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;
– Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;
-Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;
– Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);
– Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;
– Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception;
-Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.
Obama also wiretapped individuals in the US media which weren’t praising him:
– In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.
– Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance. The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”
– Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post."
BOMBSHELL: Assange Just Exposed Obama's Wiretapping ‘Victim List’ - ‘Obamagate’ Blows Wide Open!
Alan West? Are you kidding? He's about as credible as Alex Jones and Mark Levin. All bomb-throwers.
And Assange may have hacked some emails at some point, but since he's now the new hero for the alt-right, he's just like Trump: he can say anything he wants and you silly goons will just believe him.
OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
From your own link:
"The calls were picked up as part of routine electronic surveillance of Russian officials and agents in the United States, which is one of the FBI’s responsibilities, according to the U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss counterintelligence operations."
Dope.
Check your fear....So you do think your Obama deployed his Russian spies....huhNo.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?OMFG!
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
I think Trump's people, ( and apparently you as well), aren't savvy enough to know that these types of communications have been monitored for decades.
I think you're retarded.
OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
From your own link:
"The calls were picked up as part of routine electronic surveillance of Russian officials and agents in the United States, which is one of the FBI’s responsibilities, according to the U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss counterintelligence operations."
Dope.
Americans are protected from such Wiretapping and spying even if they are not the target of such wiretapping and spying.
So a FELONY was committed by releasing this information to The Washington Post.
And remember Clapper said there was no wire tapping at Trump Tower, which is where The Flynn Conversation took place.
He also said there was no evidence whatsoever of Russians and the Trump Campaign colluding to impact the election. Do you believe either statement?
Here is how Obama, The DNC, and The Clinton Campaign set this all up.
Kislyak met with Obama 22 times during Clinton's campaign, and also met with Hillary Clinton numerous times. Each time after meeting with Obama or Clinton he attempted to meet with as many members of The Trump team as he could and was directed to do so by The Obama Regime, after the wire taps were installed. They even spied on Sessions.
- Fake Russian Hacking Story of The DNC Server.
- That Lie was used to justify wire tapping of The Trump Campaign.
- Once a Wire Tap was installed, Obama would send Russian Ambassador Kislyak to The Targets.
It matters not that each target conducted themselves with honor, and did nothing illicit or illegal.
The entire purpose of the illegal wire taps were to undermine and discredit as many Trump Campaign Staff Members as they could.
This is The Biggest Scandal in US History. It is Watergate on Steroids.
The Obama Administration, DNC, & The Clinton Campaign were working with Russia to impact and affect US Elections!
The Dems always accuse others of what they themselves are doing in the shadows. And it's about time America woke up to their seditious and evil ways before they put America and our intelligence community in serious danger, if they haven't already compromised it severely enough.
Completely incorrect.Americans are protected from such Wiretapping and spying even if they are not the target of such wiretapping and spying.
So a FELONY was committed by releasing this information to The Washington Post.
Clapper is a proven liar.well sure I can, you can't do tapping without a FISA order, and Clapper said there wasn't one. So what else would you like? game set match.Prove that it was illegal. You can't.proved out by Flynn's tap. sorry, game set match .‘The White House Is a Joke':
MSNBC reporter torches Sean Spicer: Why did Trump ask Congress to uncover wiretap info he already has?
During Tuesday’s White House briefing, Jackson asked Spicer, if Trump already has proof that President Barack Obama illegally wiretapped him then why would he call for a congressional investigation.
‘Morning Joe’ Rips Trump for Obama Wiretapping Claims (Video)
OMFG!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Are you really this retarded?
The communications of Russian officials are monitored.
If you call them, your communications with them then are part of that monitoring.
From your own link:
"The calls were picked up as part of routine electronic surveillance of Russian officials and agents in the United States, which is one of the FBI’s responsibilities, according to the U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss counterintelligence operations."
Dope.
Americans are protected from such Wiretapping and spying even if they are not the target of such wiretapping and spying.
So a FELONY was committed by releasing this information to The Washington Post.
And remember Clapper said there was no wire tapping at Trump Tower, which is where The Flynn Conversation took place.
He also said there was no evidence whatsoever of Russians and the Trump Campaign colluding to impact the election. Do you believe either statement?
Here is how Obama, The DNC, and The Clinton Campaign set this all up.
Kislyak met with Obama 22 times during Clinton's campaign, and also met with Hillary Clinton numerous times. Each time after meeting with Obama or Clinton he attempted to meet with as many members of The Trump team as he could and was directed to do so by The Obama Regime, after the wire taps were installed. They even spied on Sessions.
- Fake Russian Hacking Story of The DNC Server.
- That Lie was used to justify wire tapping of The Trump Campaign.
- Once a Wire Tap was installed, Obama would send Russian Ambassador Kislyak to The Targets.
It matters not that each target conducted themselves with honor, and did nothing illicit or illegal.
The entire purpose of the illegal wire taps were to undermine and discredit as many Trump Campaign Staff Members as they could.
This is The Biggest Scandal in US History. It is Watergate on Steroids.
The Obama Administration, DNC, & The Clinton Campaign were working with Russia to impact and affect US Elections!
The Dems always accuse others of what they themselves are doing in the shadows. And it's about time America woke up to their seditious and evil ways before they put America and our intelligence community in serious danger, if they haven't already compromised it severely enough.
And remember Clapper said there was no wire tapping at Trump Tower, which is where The Flynn Conversation took place.
Well, your democrat fear is jaw dropping..,,Check your fear....So you do think your Obama deployed his Russian spies....huhNo.So you think Obama deployed his Russian friends as spies knowing this?
I think Trump's people, ( and apparently you as well), aren't savvy enough to know that these types of communications have been monitored for decades.
I think you're retarded.
Check your mouth. It's no doubt hanging open.
game set match baby!!!!!It doesn't look that way at all, dope.Trump is the innocent victim in all this.RussiaGate continues to entangle Trump.
He can't get away.
It seems Trump successfully created a new narrative that at least some of the most deplorable among us have embraced wholly.
You dopes are so easy.
You don't believe the Obama Administration engaged in surveillance on Trump's Campaign? Because it looks like it did happen. I mean a sitting Presdent ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, is a pretty big deal. Very disturbing. If proven true, it's Watergate ten-fold. It would represent a shockingly brazen attack on our Democracy.
How exactly then did The Washington Post get a verbatim transcript of Flynn's conversations in Trump Tower?
How was The FBI able to review this information and determine Flynn did nothing wrong?
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
