Obamagate: Obama Sent Private Letter To National Archives Claiming ‘Confidentiality’ Demands Docs Are Not Released

Former President Barack Obama has now inserted himself in the Russian, Ukraine mess right on cue and his timing is perfect. As transcripts are released we see cockroaches like Comey and Brennan run like rats as the light is shined on their corruption.

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine. Obama’s letter to NARA has to do with Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson requesting the Obama’s administrations records on Ukraine meetings that took pace on November 21, 2019. Former President Obama claims the letter is only to “shift the blame for Russian interference in the 2016 election to Ukraine.”





BJ -
during the Obama admin. over 1100 elected seats switched from Democrat to Republican because decent people saw him as a problem.
Maybe now even some of the indecent ones will see it.

So the Senate investigation itself said Russia helped Tramp. And its why Burr is being investigated by the FBI.

Read and weep you trampers.


And yet every single person involved testified under oath that literally no evidence was found to back that up.

Fact , Burr is being investigated by the FBI.
Fact: Russia wanted to help tramp, even the republicans said so.
Those are your facts, darling.
They differ than those in reality
 
Former President Barack Obama has now inserted himself in the Russian, Ukraine mess right on cue and his timing is perfect. As transcripts are released we see cockroaches like Comey and Brennan run like rats as the light is shined on their corruption.

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine. Obama’s letter to NARA has to do with Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson requesting the Obama’s administrations records on Ukraine meetings that took pace on November 21, 2019. Former President Obama claims the letter is only to “shift the blame for Russian interference in the 2016 election to Ukraine.”





BJ -
during the Obama admin. over 1100 elected seats switched from Democrat to Republican because decent people saw him as a problem.
Maybe now even some of the indecent ones will see it.
Those seats are now switching back
 
Former President Barack Obama has now inserted himself in the Russian, Ukraine mess right on cue and his timing is perfect. As transcripts are released we see cockroaches like Comey and Brennan run like rats as the light is shined on their corruption.

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine. Obama’s letter to NARA has to do with Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson requesting the Obama’s administrations records on Ukraine meetings that took pace on November 21, 2019. Former President Obama claims the letter is only to “shift the blame for Russian interference in the 2016 election to Ukraine.”





BJ -
during the Obama admin. over 1100 elected seats switched from Democrat to Republican because decent people saw him as a problem.
Maybe now even some of the indecent ones will see it.
The criminal is in full-on cover up mode.
 
I see you're trying to baffle them with BS again, comrade. Get back to the Kremlin for further orders

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine.
Whatever is in those documents certainly has Obama on the defensive and he seems shook up. In his letter, Obama said that he already “produced 12,2880 pages of presidential records in response to special access requests from the White House and Congress. This use of the special access process serves no legitimate purpose and does not outweigh or justify infringing confidentiality interests that all presidents have sought to protect.”

Obama does not want the records released and claims they are “confidential.”​

Very funny.

Here's the link to President Obama's letter to NARA. It reads:

Nevertheless, in the interest of countering the misinformation campaign underlying this request, we are prepared on this occasion to provide the Committees access to the records responsive to this request. In doing so, we emphasize that abuse of the special access process strikes at the heart of presidential confidentiality interests and undermines the statutory framework and norms that govern access to presidential records.​

But the lying propagandist of "thepatriotdaily" knows his marks, and craftily and correctly assesses their near limitless imbecility. Doesn't he?
 
The rats are starting to scramble. We are watching Obama's legacy being written in real time for
the historians. This is priceless
You're an uninformed idiot.

"The request for early release of presidential records in order to give credence to a Russian disinformation campaign -- one that has already been thoroughly investigated by a bipartisan congressional committee -- is without precedent," said the letter signed by Obama's records representative and dated March 13.
Obama's office went on to write that it will release the requested records but only "in the interest of countering the misinformation campaign underlying this request."

I see you're trying to baffle them with BS again, comrade. Get back to the Kremlin for further orders

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine.
Whatever is in those documents certainly has Obama on the defensive and he seems shook up. In his letter, Obama said that he already “produced 12,2880 pages of presidential records in response to special access requests from the White House and Congress. This use of the special access process serves no legitimate purpose and does not outweigh or justify infringing confidentiality interests that all presidents have sought to protect.”
Unfortunately, "The Patriot Daily" may not be the best new source because they forgot to include the last paragraph in the letter:
1589466814290.png



Can't imagine why they would have left that out...
 
Former President Barack Obama has now inserted himself in the Russian, Ukraine mess right on cue and his timing is perfect. As transcripts are released we see cockroaches like Comey and Brennan run like rats as the light is shined on their corruption.

Four years after leaving the White House, in March, the former President sent the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) a letter. The letter attacks Senate Republican for investigating Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine. Obama’s letter to NARA has to do with Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson requesting the Obama’s administrations records on Ukraine meetings that took pace on November 21, 2019. Former President Obama claims the letter is only to “shift the blame for Russian interference in the 2016 election to Ukraine.”





BJ -
during the Obama admin. over 1100 elected seats switched from Democrat to Republican because decent people saw him as a problem.
Maybe now even some of the indecent ones will see it.
The criminal is in full-on cover up mode.


If he just stays mostly silent the media will whitewash everything as it did during his 8 years of actually commixing the crimes.
 
The criminal douche bag is attempting to protect himself, Biden, Rice, Powers, Brennan, Comey, and others now that the names of who unmasked Flynn.

With the archives anyone who sought to do so could research these individuals' actions before and immediately after unmasking Flynn, to include seeing any coordination going on between all of them - which would mean 'Conspiracy'.

These criminals are freaking out after released transcripts / documents confirming Strzok's texts that Obama demanded to be kept update on everything they were doing, that Barry was holding meetings in the Oval Office about all of it, that he was pulling the strings.

Powers was just exposed as a lying Conspirator after testifying she had no recollection of unmasking Flynn....only to have documents prove she did so at least 7 times and that her office was responsible for more than tripling the number of unmaskings in the final year of the Obama administration. (This proves they were abusing their power by using unmaskings to keep tabs on their political rivals.)
-- Powers will get away with it, though, by claiming she truly could not remember THAT DAY how her office perpetrated thousands of un-maskings that year, to include 7 of Flynn.
Ya... like you or I could rob a bank, the bank then provides video evidence it was us that robbed the bank, but we'd get off because we couldn't remember robbing the bank on that day.

These pricks all broke the law, and they all belong in prison.

Hussein and the scandal free administration aye... pfft... riiiiiiiiiiight.
 
Is Obama not entitled to executive privilege?
HE is no longer in office... Executive privlige is no longer an option. He is now a private citizen and can be held criminally liable for his actions. This is why he is squirming like a little worm..
Those records remain confidential until the Pres has been out of office for a certain number of years. It is standard pro forma with the Archives. The ex-Pres can approve release of documents early, which he did.
 
There was a thread on this a week ago. Obama criticized the request BUT HE APPROVED THE RELEASE OF THE DOCUMENTS. Do I need to link the actual letter?
The thread title is still valid. President Obama sent a letter because he did not want the information accessed. I think he backed off because 1) it would make him look bad, and 2) he knew he would lose.

Whatever the case, the man has to be a little 'concerned' about all these documents and information being released.
 
So the Senate investigation itself said Russia helped Tramp.
Released Russia Probe transcripts and official FBI documents prove there NEVER was any evidence that Trump or his teal colluded with the Russians or that the Russians intervened to help Trump becoming President.

In fact, just the opposite: Evidence shows Brennan oppressed evidence showing the Russians supported and attempted to help HILLARY win.

Then there is just plain old common sense on top of all the evidence, but snowflakes lack the common sense God gave a door knob...

IF THE RUSSIANS WANTED TRUMP TO BE PRESIDENT, WHY THE HELL WOULD THE RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE SELL HILLARY AND PROVIDE TO THE FBI THROUGHA TRUMP-HATING, PROVEN UNTRUSTWORTHY FOREIGN EX SPY (WHO WAS WORKING FOR FUSION GPS ANBD RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS) RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA (AS ASSESSED BY THE FBI ITSELF) ALREADY BEING USED AGAINSYTUS FOREIGN POLICYTO BE USED TO TRY TO KEEPO TRUMPFROM WINNING THE PRESICENCY AND TO REMOVE HIM FRPOMOFFICE IF HE WON?

To believe the Russians preferred Trump after THAT means you either have to have a 'partisan' rating off the scale OR you have an IQ just above PLANT LIFE.


.
This is your typical Obama turd today.

TRINNITY HAIR ON FIRE GIF AVI.gif
 
....remain confidential until the Pres has been out of office for a certain number of years. It is standard pro forma with the Archives. The ex-Pres can approve release of documents early, which he did.

I personally don't like it. The President - whoever they are - works for us, and all actions taken by out elected officials (not involving national security, etc..) should be available to us - FOIA, FRA.

Here's one extreme reason - There is a time limit on certain crimes. If the information is not allowed to be released for a certain number of years the clock is being 'run out'.

Transparency is the main reason I oppose it. For example, I still can NOT believe a bunch of 'Servants Of The People' sealed the Kennedy assassination information away from US citizens...I call BS on that one.


( The unpublished portion of those records was initially sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archives policy that applied to all federal investigations by the executive branch of government,[19] a period "intended to serve as protection for innocent persons who could otherwise be damaged because of their relationship with participants in the case

)
 
There was a thread on this a week ago. Obama criticized the request BUT HE APPROVED THE RELEASE OF THE DOCUMENTS. Do I need to link the actual letter?
The thread title is still valid. President Obama sent a letter because he did not want the information accessed. I think he backed off because 1) it would make him look bad, and 2) he knew he would lose.

Whatever the case, the man has to be a little 'concerned' about all these documents and information being released.
The thread title is a lie, just like the thread a week ago was a lie. Same source, and anyone who doesn't read carefully and swallowed it whole might not know it was a lie, but when I first read the article, it seemed suspicious that there was so little actually provided of the letter. So I looked it up.
 
I personally don't like it. The President - whoever they are - works for us, and all actions taken by out elected officials (not involving national security, etc..) should be available to us - FOIA, FRA.
Unless it's Trump, right? You were opposed to Trump blocking his underlings from testifying in the Ukraine matter? That was actions taken by our elected officials and I agree with you we should have had the right to see and hear what they were up to there.
 
I think he backed off because 1) it would make him look bad, and 2) he knew he would lose.
Well, actually he said he released it to clear the air and show that there was nothing in it that would make him look bad.
 
The thread title is a lie, just like the thread a week ago was a lie. Same source, and anyone who doesn't read carefully and swallowed it whole might not know it was a lie, but when I first read the article, it seemed suspicious that there was so little actually provided of the letter. So I looked it up.
So you are saying Obama nor anyone associated with him, perhaps on his behalf, requested these documents not be released?
 
Well, actually he said he released it to clear the air and show that there was nothing in it that would make him look bad.
Probably thought the same thing before the Unmasking list came out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top