Obama Worried Over Bubba's Speech At Convention

[Papageorgio]

Ah, the MSM conspries to expose the GOP as it exists - how evil. You're too funny Muddy, too funny.

Your spelling is terrible.

The MSM conspires to make up evil that doesn't exist in the GOP. Oh, and diversity is just another way of saying special interests, and another way of dividing us. Celebrate America and Americans, not Gays, women, blacks, and Hispanics individually. Stop pitting one against the other. Try instead to bring us together.

And you're dumber than you appear. Why would Clinton.....a Democrat....speak at a RNC?

I can spell cavil; look it up.

I can also read and comprehend. I'll spell it out for you, slowly: Clinton (a former president) will speak at the Democratic National Convention; George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush - the last two living former GOP presidents - didn't speak at the Republican National Convention and didn't even attend.

But you can't spell proof; look it up.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Your spelling is terrible.

The MSM conspires to make up evil that doesn't exist in the GOP. Oh, and diversity is just another way of saying special interests, and another way of dividing us. Celebrate America and Americans, not Gays, women, blacks, and Hispanics individually. Stop pitting one against the other. Try instead to bring us together.

And you're dumber than you appear. Why would Clinton.....a Democrat....speak at a RNC?

I can spell cavil; look it up.

I can also read and comprehend. I'll spell it out for you, slowly: Clinton (a former president) will speak at the Democratic National Convention; George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush - the last two living former GOP presidents - didn't speak at the Republican National Convention and didn't even attend.

They spoke, just not in person.

I don't have to look it up prick.

And your spelling is atrocious.

CAVIL: to raise irritating and trivial objections; find fault with unnecessarily.

Only a coward uses fighting words while hiding behind his keyboard. That makes you a coward Muddy.

I recall G. W. Bush endorsing Romney, while the elevator doors closed on him.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. I myself think Bubba will throw Obama under the bus, *for the good of the country* he will say afterwards.
2. Bubba still loves America, and doesn't want it to be a socialist commie bullshit country, like Obama is steering us too.
3. In a way he will redeem himself for the whole Monica thingy.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[FA_Q2]

The Democratic National Convention will be extremely scripted. Diversity will be a matter of focus. Every special interest group will have to get fair treatment. Women will be one of the primary groups represented during the DNC. They will make sure everyone is aware of their race, their gender, and their religion if any. I'm not sure the fact that they're all Americans is even a consideration.

I find this statement rather peculiar due to the fact that the republican convention was the EXACT SAME THING. Did you not notice the focus on minorities and women in the convention? They played it off well but don’t kid yourself, there was a REASON that the speakers were chosen and it is no more hollow than the way the democrats will run theirs.

I'm sure you would feel that, problem is the DNC is making a point of having almost a totally female night. Their main focus is patronizing to specific groups. Blacks, women, Gays. They're having 2 hours of Muslim prayers before each evening just to make the Muslims feel more welcome.

I don't see where you get off. You outta be ashamed of yourself.


The libs can run a token black presidential candidate but let the RNC feature one woman, one black, one Hispanic, one Black Hispanic woman, and all of the sudden it's blatant tokenism.

You hypocrites.

Wow, stop being an idiot.
First, I am not a democrat. Just because someone notices the hypocrisy that you are selling does not make them a democrat. Second, you can’t refute that the lineup in the RNC was specifically engineered to contrast they party against the typical old white mime that the dems are so fond of using. TO say otherwise is acting like a partisan hack.

Then to call the other side out for doing the same thing is asinine.

I never said that the RNC should have done anything different. The DNC should either though and you’re calling them out for doing the same thing as the republicans whilst ignoring that they actually did it.

 

[Defiant1]

I'm going to watch Clinton's speech just to see if women throw cigars onstage.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Time for a trip down memory lane:

"[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee."
Bill Clinton 2008 on Obama: A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee « Hot Air


"Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:

(a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as 'Confederate Flag Day' in this state.

(b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]

(c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000)."
Signed into law by Bill Clinton.
Mark R. Levin on Trent Lott & Moral Outrage on National Review Online


We live in interesting times.

 

[The Rabbi]

I find this statement rather peculiar due to the fact that the republican convention was the EXACT SAME THING. Did you not notice the focus on minorities and women in the convention? They played it off well but don’t kid yourself, there was a REASON that the speakers were chosen and it is no more hollow than the way the democrats will run theirs.

I'm sure you would feel that, problem is the DNC is making a point of having almost a totally female night. Their main focus is patronizing to specific groups. Blacks, women, Gays. They're having 2 hours of Muslim prayers before each evening just to make the Muslims feel more welcome.

I don't see where you get off. You outta be ashamed of yourself.


The libs can run a token black presidential candidate but let the RNC feature one woman, one black, one Hispanic, one Black Hispanic woman, and all of the sudden it's blatant tokenism.

You hypocrites.

The Democrats passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act opposed by Republicans. Democrats supported the ERA which Republicans opposed. Tokenism? I suppose you can fool some of the people all of the time; but not all of us and some of us are never fooled by propaganda parrots and liars.

Are you trying to make a list of Democratic policy failures, cock-breath?
Clinton is well known for not liking Obama. He is the one who said "This guy ought to be bringing us coffee." Team Obama is desperate to avoid anything that might be a gaffe. They dont want a replay of the SF convention in 1984.

 

[mudwhistle]

I can spell cavil; look it up.

I can also read and comprehend. I'll spell it out for you, slowly: Clinton (a former president) will speak at the Democratic National Convention; George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush - the last two living former GOP presidents - didn't speak at the Republican National Convention and didn't even attend.

They spoke, just not in person.

I don't have to look it up prick.

And your spelling is atrocious.

CAVIL: to raise irritating and trivial objections; find fault with unnecessarily.

Only a coward uses fighting words while hiding behind his keyboard. That makes you a coward Muddy.

I recall G. W. Bush endorsing Romney, while the elevator doors closed on him.

Funny you would know that......seeing as how libs have a tendency to do it 24/7.

And I'm not the one talking tough with a keyboard.

Oh, and if Bush had showed up you pricks would be saying Romney and Bush were one in the same. So basically you're finding something wrong ether way. But that is all you fuckers seem to do, mainly because the ass-hat you've got is a total tool. You have to make our guy look like shit because your guy needs about $2,000,000,000.00 of free media coverage to keep his lying worthless ass from looking like total crapola.

 

[mudwhistle]

I find this statement rather peculiar due to the fact that the republican convention was the EXACT SAME THING. Did you not notice the focus on minorities and women in the convention? They played it off well but don’t kid yourself, there was a REASON that the speakers were chosen and it is no more hollow than the way the democrats will run theirs.

I'm sure you would feel that, problem is the DNC is making a point of having almost a totally female night. Their main focus is patronizing to specific groups. Blacks, women, Gays. They're having 2 hours of Muslim prayers before each evening just to make the Muslims feel more welcome.

I don't see where you get off. You outta be ashamed of yourself.


The libs can run a token black presidential candidate but let the RNC feature one woman, one black, one Hispanic, one Black Hispanic woman, and all of the sudden it's blatant tokenism.

You hypocrites.

Wow, stop being an idiot.
First, I am not a democrat. Just because someone notices the hypocrisy that you are selling does not make them a democrat. Second, you can’t refute that the lineup in the RNC was specifically engineered to contrast they party against the typical old white mime that the dems are so fond of using. TO say otherwise is acting like a partisan hack.

Then to call the other side out for doing the same thing is asinine.

I never said that the RNC should have done anything different. The DNC should either though and you’re calling them out for doing the same thing as the republicans whilst ignoring that they actually did it.

The other side isn't doing the same thing....you know featuring "Up With Women" night. You Dems plan on kissing the asses of every special-interest group imaginable.

It all depends on who they feel needs fluffing more.

I'm sure if they felt the black community was abandoning them they would be all up in their ass telling them how important they are.

The focus should be on Obama's record and what his plans are for the second term, but instead they have to focus on saying "All of you women, Hispanics, Blacks, and Gays mean so much to us.......this night is for you. We love you, unlike those white racist women-raping bastards over in the GOP".

 

[Eaglewings]

~ At least there is a president showing up to support Barack Obama, the RNC had to use a old acting fart Clint Eastwood that should have just used the chair to sit down.

 

[Warrior102]

Is Clinton going to bring a cum-stained empty dress to talk to?

 

[Katzndogz]

Why won't Billy let anyone see his speech before hand?

 

[mudwhistle]

~ At least there is a president showing up to support Barack Obama, the RNC had to use a old acting fart Clint Eastwood that should have just used the chair to sit down.

Bush did his part. I'm sure you would have bitched if he had showed up.

 

[The Rabbi]

Is Clinton going to bring a cum-stained empty dress to talk to?

No. He's going to jerk off on stage into one.

You know Team Obama is in trouble because they're trotting out Bill. They only trot out Bill when they need serious help. Like in Wisconsin. Bill Clinton, the only president impeached in the 20th century, the president who probably took bribes from the ChiComs, the president who disgraced the Oval Office with his sexual antics, the president who cried for political gain--this is the truly the best the Democrats have. Because he won two elections.

 

[Too Tall]

Why would anyone pay attention to an adultering, impeached, lying under oath, disbarred failure like Clinton.

Because he is more entertaining to listen to, he has a personality and charisma. That he has a good ole boy about him. Obama is stiff and rehearsed.

Clinton does have all of the characteristic of a first rate confidence man. And that is exactly what he is.

 

[geauxtohell]

Why would anyone pay attention to an adultering, impeached, lying under oath, disbarred failure like Clinton.

Because he's still about 20 percentage points higher in approval ratings than your hero George W. Bush, who most Americans think is a total douche bag.

I guess birds of a feather.

 

[Eaglewings]

I'm sure you would feel that, problem is the DNC is making a point of having almost a totally female night. Their main focus is patronizing to specific groups. Blacks, women, Gays. They're having 2 hours of Muslim prayers before each evening just to make the Muslims feel more welcome.

I don't see where you get off. You outta be ashamed of yourself.


The libs can run a token black presidential candidate but let the RNC feature one woman, one black, one Hispanic, one Black Hispanic woman, and all of the sudden it's blatant tokenism.

You hypocrites.

The Democrats passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act opposed by Republicans. Democrats supported the ERA which Republicans opposed. Tokenism? I suppose you can fool some of the people all of the time; but not all of us and some of us are never fooled by propaganda parrots and liars.

Are you trying to make a list of Democratic policy failures, cock-breath?
Clinton is well known for not liking Obama. He is the one who said "This guy ought to be bringing us coffee." Team Obama is desperate to avoid anything that might be a gaffe. They dont want a replay of the SF convention in 1984.

oooooooo cockbreath Big Boy words now.
Clinton has done many commercials and interviews supporting Obama , he must really hate Obama a lot.
Of coarse they didn't see eye to eye when his wife was debating him for the 2008 presidency race.

 

[Greenbeard]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3r6xvwPGcY]President Bill Clinton at the 2008 DNC - YouTube[/ame]

Worrisome!

 

[mudwhistle]

Why would anyone pay attention to an adultering, impeached, lying under oath, disbarred failure like Clinton.

Because he's still about 20 percentage points higher in approval ratings than your hero George W. Bush, who most Americans think is a total douche bag.

I guess birds of a feather.

Yup, you can be a rapist and a drug-addict and a total sleaze, but when you get friendly press you get higher approval ratings.

 

[bodecea]

Bill Clinton is well known to have a deep hatred for Barack Obama and insiders have said Bubba has openly said that Obama is an amateur. A lousy president.

The man from Hope AK is busy writing his keynote address at the DNC and he's furious because Obama's campaign keeps calling him and asking what's in it.

Well, if the guy doesn't trust him why the heck did he make him his keynote speaker?

The Democratic National Convention will be extremely scripted. Diversity will be a matter of focus. Every special interest group will have to get fair treatment. Women will be one of the primary groups represented during the DNC. They will make sure everyone is aware of their race, their gender, and their religion if any. I'm not sure the fact that they're all Americans is even a consideration.

I want to see Bill Clinton's address. To be honest I feel we would be in much better hands if he was in the Oval Office instead of the current occupant. Obama thinks that some of this hope will rub off when Bubba shows up and brightens the mood of that place. I think this convention will be a freakshow but Clinton gives it at least some legitimacy.

But still Barack doesn't trust him.........

Excuse me? Is this any way to run a country?

I can't help but think that if this were going on in the GOP the press would be having a field-day with it.​

Suuuuuure.