Obama: The Real Obstruction of Justice

[PoliticalChic]

The Axiom: To Know What The Left Is Doing…
…or hiding…..just listen to what they blame the other side for.


1. Clear to everyone with greater than a double digit IQ, there never was any collusion between Trump and the Kremlin, and the Russians played no role in kicking Hillary to the curb.
The American people did that.

2. But….there is a basis for the clamor from the Democrats/Liberals/Leftists…..and the axiom above is the hermeneutic key to understanding the full-court press they are putting on.

The reasons:

a. They correctly saw Trump as a danger to their sinecures, wealth and future dyasties.

b. They were in grave danger of criminal penalties, e.g., the uranium deal in which....to camouflage the fact that every major Democrat elite was both knowledgeable and a participant in the corruption: Muller, Comey and Rosenstein knew and probably wet their beaks in the payoffs.

c. Obama was guilty of the exact charge against Trump!

That's right…evidence has proven that Hussein was colluding with a foreign power against the people of America.


And I will prove it here.



3. The starting point is the fact that no Liberal/Democrat has been able to answer this question successfully:
What possible benefit is there to America, or to the world, in awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Contrary to the flaccid argument that Iran is in compliance with the agreement….and no matter who says it…..there is no way to know. The 7th century savages have a built-in dodge: Iran has 14 day to say whether to allow inspections asked for, and actually has the ability to delay any inspections up to 24 days.
There is no way of ascertaining whether or not Iran is adhering to the terms.

What sort of moron would on our side would sign that sort of deal???


4. Here's a real President:
"In 1982, Ronald Reagan asked his arms control advisory committee to conduct a review of Soviet compliance in the 25 years of arms control treaties. It was the first such concerted review ever. The answer to the question of Soviet arms controls compliance was that there was none. "
West, "American Betrayal," p. 198.

"The Soviet Union repeatedly violates treaties, and the rest of the world turns their heads and proceeds to enter into still more treaties, which the Soviets violate with impunity."
Joseph D. Douglass, Jr., "Why the Soviets Violate Arms Control Treaties," vii, 83.

Unlike Hussein, the great Reagan provided the so much more realistic "Trust, but verify."
Unless, of course, ….Obama simply meant for the mullahs to have nukes all along…..


Yeah….the cryto-Islamist 'Lie of the Year' winner, did.
And I'll show that he obstructed justice to do so.
Coming right up.

 

[Timmy]

3. The starting point is the fact that no Liberal/Democrat has been able to answer this question successfully:
What possible benefit is there to America, or to the world, in awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


This is a false premise poli. No one awarded nuke weapons to Iran . The multi national deal wh Iran stops their weapons program .

And another thing . Obama was striking deals wh Iran before he was elected president .

 

[Moonglow]

She has yet to prove what nuclear weapons Oblama supposedly gave Iran...

 

[Moonglow]

Reagan did admit to illegally selling Iran arms .

 

[Moonglow]

But let's not discuss a real traitor and criminal Reagan since he is Poli's God...

 

[Deno]

She has yet to prove what nuclear weapons Oblama supposedly gave Iran...

You can buy anything with cash.

 

[Moonglow]

She has yet to prove what nuclear weapons Oblama supposedly gave Iran...

You can buy anything with cash.

No you can't, once our health goes no amount of cash will help you...

 

[rightwinger]

The Great Obama got Iran to abandon their nuclear program

Crooked Donnie is giving it back

 

[Deno]

She has yet to prove what nuclear weapons Oblama supposedly gave Iran...

You can buy anything with cash.

No you can't, once our health goes no amount of cash will help you...

We are talking about buying nukes gargoyle......

You can support terrorism with cash too....

 

[PoliticalChic]

3. The starting point is the fact that no Liberal/Democrat has been able to answer this question successfully:
What possible benefit is there to America, or to the world, in awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


This is a false premise poli. No one awarded nuke weapons to Iran . The multi national deal wh Iran stops their weapons program .

And another thing . Obama was striking deals wh Iran before he was elected president .

"No one awarded nuke weapons to Iran . The multi national deal wh Iran stops their weapons program ."



1. Obama awarded a guarantee of nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.


2. The nations accepting this bogus deal are those who will benefit financially. They turn a blind eye to arming the psychos, based on wanting to reap the benefits of business deals with Iran.

3. There is no evidence that there is any stoppage in the production of nuclear weapons.
a. Contrary to the flaccid argument that Iran is in compliance with the agreement….and no matter who says it…..there is no way to know. The 7th century savages have a built-in dodge: Iran has 14 day to say whether to allow inspections asked for, and actually has the ability to delay any inspections up to 24 days.
There is no way of ascertaining whether or not Iran is adhering to the terms.


b. The Iranians have paid North Korea 20-30% of their GDP for years to serve as Iran's nuclear and missile laboratory. The deal in no way addressed this loophole.


You should try to study an issue before you respond....you might look a drop less ignorant.

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. But….but….all the European countries are down wit it!!!!
Why would the officials of these countries ignore the threat posed by a nuclear Iran?

The nations accepting this bogus deal are those who will benefit financially. The turn a blind eye to arming the psychos, based on wanting to reap the benefits of business deals with Iran.

None of them can be sure of Iran sticking to the terms of the deal.




6. And it turns out the 'deal' is worse than we thought!

Bet you didn't know that a part of the deal is that the United States allow Iran's terrorist subsidiary to bring drugs into this country, and sell same to gain the funds to support terrorism worldwide.

Yup…..Hussein Obama, we now know, was behind preventing the authorities investigating and arresting drug dealers who had the Iranian imprimatur.



The mullahs told Obama that Hezbollah gets a free hand in cocaine smuggling….$ billion a year….or no deal.
So he obstructed US justice to bow to the wishes of the blood cult known as Iranian leadership.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Remember what I said in the OP:
Obama was guilty of the exact charge against Trump!

That's collusion with a foreign government to harm the United States.

"… it emerges the Obama administration went to extraordinary lengths to let Hezbollah off the hook for nefarious activities to avoid derailing the accord. This is what real obstruction of justice looks like - yet where's the media outrage?"
Michelle Makori (@MichelleMakori) | Twitter



"…the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States, …

…as Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way,… "
The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook




I have no doubt that there are Democrat drones who will simply shrug and count this actual obstruction of justice as naught.

They are an existential danger to America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. When Iran ordered Obama to allow the importation of cocaine into the United Stated….he did what he did in the infamous video of him with the Saudi King…..he bowed and grabbed his ankles.


"According to Politico, during the nuclear negotiations Iran requested that the Obama administration let Hezbollah off the hook and it complied." Get tough on Hezbollah, fix Obama's mistake: Revive Project Cassandra




"…multi-ton loads of cocaine entering the United States, and hundreds of millions of dollars


…Obama-era Treasury official, Katherine Bauer, in little-noticed written testimony presented last February to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, acknowledged that “under the Obama administration … these [Hezbollah-related] investigations were tamped down for fear of rocking the boat with Iran and jeopardizing the nuclear deal.”
The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook



"…Obama gave Iran piles of cash, prisoners, an immense economic stimulus, and access to international arms markets in exchange for signing the nuclear deal. We now know — thanks to Politico — that the administration’s mercies extended even to Iran’s vicious terrorist allies."
How Obama Appeased Iran by Turning a Blind Eye to Hezbollah’s Crimes



Hussein Obama: anti-American international drug smuggler.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hussein Obama removed American troops from Iraq, to clear the path for the creation of ISIS.


The very same Hussein Obama blocked the investigation and arrest of Hezbollah drug dealers so that they could sell $billion of cocaine in the United States.

He did this at the orders of the Iranian leadership.


This is what Democrats voted for.

 

[postman]

The Axiom: To Know What The Left Is Doing…
…or hiding…..just listen to what they blame the other side for.


1. Clear to everyone with greater than a double digit IQ, there never was any collusion between Trump and the Kremlin, and the Russians played no role in kicking Hillary to the curb..

$100,000 in facebook political, ads, paid for in rubles.

 

[postman]

Hussein Obama removed American troops from Iraq, to clear the path for the creation of ISIS..

George W. Bush signed a SOFA (status of forces agreement) in December 2008 that required the US withdraw troops from Iraq cities, and the bulk of the country by specific time deadlines.

Like any treaty, the US was obligated to follow the Bush troop withdrawal timeline.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Axiom: To Know What The Left Is Doing…
…or hiding…..just listen to what they blame the other side for.


1. Clear to everyone with greater than a double digit IQ, there never was any collusion between Trump and the Kremlin, and the Russians played no role in kicking Hillary to the curb..

$100,000 in facebook political, ads, paid for in rubles.

Gads, you're, a moron.


"Trump and Clinton spent $81M on US election Facebook ads, Russian agency $46K
Facebook had previously announced that $100,000 was spent on Facebook ads from June 2015 to May 2017 by Russian-linked disinformation sources, while an additional $50,000 was spent by Russians that signals indicate weren’t or were only weakly connected to an organized disinformation campaign."
Trump and Clinton spent $81M on US election Facebook ads, Russian agency $46K


There were 100 thousand Facebook adds by Russian sources……out of billions of ads….

What's the percentage?


"We know, for example, that some institution linked to the Russian government — likely the infamous Internet Research Agency — bought ads on Facebook between 2015 and 2017, with the assumed intent of stoking anger and partisanship. We know that the ads concerned wedge issues like immigration, the Second Amendment, and police brutality; we even know what some of the Russian pages and accounts were. And we know that around 3,000 ads were purchased at a cost of around $100,000.


… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?




NEXT!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hussein Obama removed American troops from Iraq, to clear the path for the creation of ISIS..

George W. Bush signed a SOFA (status of forces agreement) in December 2008 that required the US withdraw troops from Iraq cities, and the bulk of the country by specific time deadlines.

Like any treaty, the US was obligated to follow the Bush troop withdrawal timeline.

And you're an imbecile.


You can try to talk you way around the truth...but I can prove what I said:
Obama was given three years, by Bush, to get an agreement. General Barbero: ".... and we did not try hard enough..."
Obama stated that he wanted no agreement and wouldn't leave any troops.
When it became evident that he was leaving Iraq for ISIS.....he suddenly agreed that he didn't need any agreement...and sent troops back: "...this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry..."
Obama arranged for the field to be left open for ISIS.



1. Bush made sure that the community organizer had until 2012 to work out an agreement:
"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government thatset the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate. "
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com



2." BLITZER: -- Agreement that would have left a residual force, 5,000 or 10,000 U.S. troops, but you couldn't get immunity from Nuri al Maliki's government. Take us behind the scenes, clarify, who's right, John McCain or Jay Carney, in this debate.

BARBERO: Well, in the summer of 2010, prepared a briefing, I was responsible for Iraqi security forces, andtook it to all the Iraqi leaders, Maliki, the other Shia leaders, the Sunnis, the Kurds, and said here is going to be the status of your security forces, what they cannot do, what they will be able to do, when we're schedule to leave. And to a man they said, well, general, you must stay.And my response was, you must make it easy for us. So I think Maliki did not make it easy for us and we did not try hard enough. So it's a -- both views. I think it could have been done though."
CNN.com - Transcripts



3. "Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:

MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's not true.

MR. ROMNEY: Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean."
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard



4. And this:
"This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.

He wrote in Politico Magazine that in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, “told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.

Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast

Obama rejected it.




Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama


NEXT!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hussein Obama removed American troops from Iraq, to clear the path for the creation of ISIS..

George W. Bush signed a SOFA (status of forces agreement) in December 2008 that required the US withdraw troops from Iraq cities, and the bulk of the country by specific time deadlines.

Like any treaty, the US was obligated to follow the Bush troop withdrawal timeline.

Now let's get back to the OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY HUSSEIN OBAMA!


9. Obama gave his OK to Hezbollah to sell cocaine in the United States.
He stopped any investigation of Hezbollah's drug dealing.

QED: Obstruction of Justice.


How did Hezbollah use the $ billions that Hussein Obama allowed them to accrue????


" The consequences were deadly. In the most personally painful part of the Politico piece, Meyer details Hezbollah’s role in funding EFPs that “were ripping M1 Abrams tanks in half.”

I remember the power of these weapons quite well. A smaller version of an EFP was used to kill men that I knew in Iraq. The mere threat of EFPs at one point shut down all ground supply routes into our base near the Iranian border…EFPs killed hundreds of American soldiers, and they were supplied by the Iranian government and its Hezbollah allies.
How Obama Appeased Iran by Turning a Blind Eye to Hezbollah’s Crimes


And those EFPs were bought and paid for by the $ billions that Hussein Obama allowed Hezbollah to accrue through the sale of cocaine in the United States.


"Iran hasn’t retreated one inch from its anti-Americanism or its commitment to international jihad. It’s even sending aid (including senior commandos) to the Taliban in Afghanistan."
Ibid.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Axiom: To Know What The Left Is Doing…
…or hiding…..just listen to what they blame the other side for.


1. Clear to everyone with greater than a double digit IQ, there never was any collusion between Trump and the Kremlin, and the Russians played no role in kicking Hillary to the curb..

$100,000 in facebook political, ads, paid for in rubles.

Aren't you amazed at how neatly and easily I utterly destroyed your posts?

I was gonna say 'emasculated,' but realize how sensitive you must be to that...your personality and all.....