Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama has reduced the governments annual spending to about half of what Bush spent annually but Obama has increased the national debt at a faster rate. How is this possible, is it that Obama is putting the peoples money and credit into unsuccesful programs.
go right ahead and prove me wrong then.
Obama has reduced the governments annual spending to about half of what Bush spent annually but Obama has increased the national debt at a faster rate. How is this possible, is it that Obama is putting the peoples money and credit into unsuccesful programs.
go right ahead and prove me wrong then.
Actually, the onus is on you to support your contentions. Please do so, specifically about Obama spending half of what Biush did. I don't think so, in fact I'm fairly sure Obama's federal spending has increased since he took office.
According to usgovernmentspending.com, in 2001 Bush spent 1.892 trillion, and in his last year (2008) he spent 2.982 trillion. Obama's first year saw 3.517 trillion spent, and in 2012 it is projected to be 3.795 trillion.
go right ahead and prove me wrong then.
Actually, the onus is on you to support your contentions. Please do so, specifically about Obama spending half of what Biush did. I don't think so, in fact I'm fairly sure Obama's federal spending has increased since he took office.
According to usgovernmentspending.com, in 2001 Bush spent 1.892 trillion, and in his last year (2008) he spent 2.982 trillion. Obama's first year saw 3.517 trillion spent, and in 2012 it is projected to be 3.795 trillion.
Bush's last year includes the $3.517 trillion spent as it was part of Bush's budget. The budget is approved in October; Bush didn't leave office until January. This is where Republicans try to confuse the picture, by forcing that huge budget of 2009 onto Obama. Obama's first year that he is responsible for is 2010, and his last year of this administration will be the 2013 budget. This is why we see that Obama's spending has not increased much at all, if any, since he took office.
go right ahead and prove me wrong then.
Actually, the onus is on you to support your contentions. Please do so, specifically about Obama spending half of what Biush did. I don't think so, in fact I'm fairly sure Obama's federal spending has increased since he took office.
According to usgovernmentspending.com, in 2001 Bush spent 1.892 trillion, and in his last year (2008) he spent 2.982 trillion. Obama's first year saw 3.517 trillion spent, and in 2012 it is projected to be 3.795 trillion.
Bush's last year includes the $3.517 trillion spent as it was part of Bush's budget. The budget is approved in October; Bush didn't leave office until January. This is where Republicans try to confuse the picture, by forcing that huge budget of 2009 onto Obama. Obama's first year that he is responsible for is 2010, and his last year of this administration will be the 2013 budget. This is why we see that Obama's spending has not increased much at all, if any, since he took office.
Obama has reduced the governments annual spending to about half of what Bush spent annually but Obama has increased the national debt at a faster rate. How is this possible, is it that Obama is putting the peoples money and credit into unsuccesful programs.
First of all, where are you getting your information from? Obama has not spent more than Bush did in his last year, but he hasn't cut spending in half. Spending under Obama is about the same as in Bush's last year. The reason the deficit has exploded on a yearly basis is that revenue is down about 30%.
Obama has reduced the governments annual spending to about half of what Bush spent annually...
but Obama has increased the national debt at a faster rate. How is this possible...
Obama has reduced the governments annual spending to about half of what Bush spent annually but Obama has increased the national debt at a faster rate. How is this possible, is it that Obama is putting the peoples money and credit into unsuccesful programs.
First of all, where are you getting your information from? Obama has not spent more than Bush did in his last year, but he hasn't cut spending in half. Spending under Obama is about the same as in Bush's last year. The reason the deficit has exploded on a yearly basis is that revenue is down about 30%.