TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Bully tactics? I made points that you OBVIOUSLY can't counter. Good job, 'Mr. Objective.'
And how would I counter them if they're just bully tactics.
You've taken a fact, dismissed it, pretended it didn't happen, then made a point based on this. You won't accept the fact, which clearly shows you are plain wrong. So, no, I can't counter you ignoring things. Although any sane intelligent person will know I'm right.
What are you talking about, dude? I took your 'fact' and addressed it by noting that status of forces agreement allowed for extensions. I also noted that further negotiation was an option. That's the point that you broke down and called me a bully. That's just plain pathetic, dude. You hit something you couldn't counter and you just cried. Now, if you were objective like you've claimed, you might have said, 'Oh, Obama could've kept troops in Iraq and chose not to.' But you're not objective. You're just some deuche apologist.
Obama DID offer to keep keep US troops in Iraqnam........but under the condition that they operate exclusively under US legal jurisdiction.........He required that this be stipulated to be the Iraqnamese parliament.......Maliki decline to even bring it before it......that was a deal killer.....
With what part of that do you struggle?
They already weren't exclusively under US juridstiction. Derp....
And whose fault was that?
I'm guessing it would be the idiot who "negotiated" the 2008 SOFA...but then, his only priority was making certain US troops didn't withdraw from his colossal blunder under his watch.......
I was pointing out the fact. That's debatable whether it's someone's fault. I'd say from my p.o.v. it's Bush's fault. Maybe, we weren't officially at war; but if you have soldiers in combat zones, they shouldn't be subject to outside laws, especially those of politically compromised municipalities.