Obama promises to pay legal fees WITH OUR MONEY if companies don't warn employees

Can't find a valid reason for blocking the notices aside from damage control. Maybe congress should have passed a deficit/budget plan and then we wouldn't be facing this crisis in letter administration.
 

This is against the law... but when has that ever stopped them?

It is a violation of the law for the companies. Hence the promise to pay legal fees. Sadly the poor people getting laid off won't see it coming. If Obama really cared he would promise to pay their bills. A phone and foodstamps just isn't going to cut it

Cons are hilarious. All you do is bitch and moan about government spending, and then when you see the effects of actually cutting that spending, you cry about it. You can't have it both ways.
 
It's not violating any laws, because the layoffs aren't going to happen.

Neither side will let it happen.

they dont care about reality they only care about trying to find something to hate Obama for since they cant admitt they hate him for being black while president

Does "black while president" mean he's going to turn another color when he's not president?? Lol!
 
Time to rebuild our nation instead of the rest of the world. This is what we need to do....

Fund our science programs and fill them with Americans.
Fund construction of our country and fill them with construction workers.
Fund Nasa and go to the fucking moon and onto mars. Flip China off.

Make our country number effin one again.
 
Whether or not the layoffs actually happen, the crime of solicitation to break federal law has already occurred.
 
they dont care about reality they only care about trying to find something to hate Obama for since they cant admitt they hate him for being black while president

If this sucker goes through-- we're going to have a deep recession. The world is going to take a total fucking shit.

what sucker matt?

tell us your grand predictions in some detail
Our predictions came true with obamaturd being the grand liar he is.
 
Whether or not the layoffs actually happen, the crime of solicitation to break federal law has already occurred.

You think Obama gives a shit about the law? :eusa_silenced:

No but voters should. Not just because obama asked companies to break the law by not complying with the law that mandates sending out advance law off notices, but because he's breaking the law period. This vile little creature and his entire royal court have nothing but contempt for laws.
 
Time to rebuild our nation instead of the rest of the world. This is what we need to do....

Fund our science programs and fill them with Americans.
Fund construction of our country and fill them with construction workers.
Fund Nasa and go to the fucking moon and onto mars. Flip China off.

Make our country number effin one again.

but you forgot the con montra.

the government cant create anything good or any jobs
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
It's not violating any laws, because the layoffs aren't going to happen.

Neither side will let it happen.

I don't think that is pertinent at this point. If they are SCHEDULED for layoffs, (regardless if it actually happens or not) they have to be notified. That is the law. Using taxpayer funds for litigation fees is certainly not legal.
Now let's talk ethics, Doctor....
 
Either the president is confident that lay-offs won't occur, or he's attempting to prevent panic right before the election.... Maybe a bit of both.

Either way, it's clearly a violation of the law to not send those notices.

It doesn't matter whether lay offs occur or do not occur. The crime is complete when the government coerced these companies into breaking the law and agreed to pay all costs associated with prosecution.

obama isn't trying to prevent panic, he's trying to prevent people voting against him. The result is, that while everyone already knows that the lay offs are a distinct possibility, they don't know WHO will be getting those notices. In trying to stop some unemployed people from voting against him, obama has increased suspicion among ALL the employees that it could be them.
 
What part of, "IT'S AGAINST THE LAW," don't you liberals understand?! Do you think it's ok to break laws at will?? REMEMBER THAT.. Power is about to change in this country.. I don't want to hear a word out of the resident Zombie herd if the same occurs.
 
These layoffs are more than a "distinct possibility", Katz. As things stand today, they're happening. We have no reason whatsoever to believe they won't.
 
so why are you guys concerned about these fakes jobs?


they cant be real becuase they are funded by the government.

We all know the government cant creat jobs.

well at least in con world its true

Please work on your reading comprehension. This thread is not about the defense jobs that might be cut. It is about the fact that Obama has asked companies to not follow the law regarding lay off notices because he's afraid that if the companies follow the law, he will lose votes. In addition, he has told them that IF they listen to him and DON'T follow the law, if they get sued or fined for the violations, then the government, (taxpayers) will pay all their legal fees. You should learn to pay attention and quit trying to derail threads.
 
This is against the law... but when has that ever stopped them?

It is a violation of the law for the companies. Hence the promise to pay legal fees. Sadly the poor people getting laid off won't see it coming. If Obama really cared he would promise to pay their bills. A phone and foodstamps just isn't going to cut it

Cons are hilarious. All you do is bitch and moan about government spending, and then when you see the effects of actually cutting that spending, you cry about it. You can't have it both ways.

So Obama's answer is to tell companies to break the law and then we'll spend even MORE money, paying for their litigation costs due to breaking the law. Can you point out the savings there or just admit that this is all for the election?
 

This is against the law... but when has that ever stopped them?

It is a violation of the law for the companies. Hence the promise to pay legal fees. Sadly the poor people getting laid off won't see it coming. If Obama really cared he would promise to pay their bills. A phone and foodstamps just isn't going to cut it

I thought you guys wanted less government? If people at defense contracting companies lose their jobs by cutting out wasteful government spending, isn't that OK? Sort of like cutting our force of poliemen, firemen, teachers, etc etc? You know, public servants that you were OK with in order to balance the budgets?
 

Forum List

Back
Top