Obama: New US Citizens Can Skip the Part of Oath That Includes Defending Country

[Steve_McGarrett]

Completely unacceptable. The man who ordered this hates this country and is unfit to lead it.




Obama New US Citizens Can Skip the Part of Oath That Includes Defending Country - The Gateway Pundit

 

[pinqy]

Completely unacceptable. The man who ordered this hates this country and is unfit to lead it.




Obama New US Citizens Can Skip the Part of Oath That Includes Defending Country - The Gateway Pundit

The Naturalization Oath has NOT been changed and no people cannot just "skip it.

Oath of Allegience Modifications and Waivers

An applicant may request a modified oath that does not contain one or both of the following clauses:



•To bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; and


•To perform noncombatant service in the U.S. armed forces when required by the law. [1]

In order to modify the oath, the applicant must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she is unwilling or unable to affirm to these sections of the oath based on his or her religious training and belief, which may include a deeply held moral or ethical code. [2]

There is no exemption from the clause “to perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.” [3]

 

[longknife]

It's his opening the way for Muslims to turn their back on defending this country.

Another plank in his goal to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

 

[Stephanie]

I was just reading this on another site. My gawd how much more are we going to be SLAPPED in our face by this man.

 

[pinqy]

It's his opening the way for Muslims to turn their back on defending this country.

Another plank in his goal to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

You're claiming Muslims are conscientious objectors? That's all the change applies to.

 

[pinqy]

I was just reading this on another site. My gawd how much more are we going to be SLAPPED in our face by this man.

Religious freedom is slapping us in the face?

 

[longknife]

Completely unacceptable. The man who ordered this hates this country and is unfit to lead it.




Obama New US Citizens Can Skip the Part of Oath That Includes Defending Country - The Gateway Pundit

The Naturalization Oath has NOT been changed and no people cannot just "skip it.

Oath of Allegience Modifications and Waivers

An applicant may request a modified oath that does not contain one or both of the following clauses:



•To bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; and


•To perform noncombatant service in the U.S. armed forces when required by the law. [1]

In order to modify the oath, the applicant must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she is unwilling or unable to affirm to these sections of the oath based on his or her religious training and belief, which may include a deeply held moral or ethical code. [2]

There is no exemption from the clause “to perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.” [3]

In other words, as I posted, allowing MUSLIMS to not require themselves to seek to defend the constitution.

 

[pinqy]

Completely unacceptable. The man who ordered this hates this country and is unfit to lead it.




Obama New US Citizens Can Skip the Part of Oath That Includes Defending Country - The Gateway Pundit

The Naturalization Oath has NOT been changed and no people cannot just "skip it.

Oath of Allegience Modifications and Waivers

An applicant may request a modified oath that does not contain one or both of the following clauses:



•To bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; and


•To perform noncombatant service in the U.S. armed forces when required by the law. [1]

In order to modify the oath, the applicant must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she is unwilling or unable to affirm to these sections of the oath based on his or her religious training and belief, which may include a deeply held moral or ethical code. [2]

There is no exemption from the clause “to perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.” [3]

In other words, as I posted, allowing MUSLIMS to not require themselves to seek to defend the constitution.

Just Muslims? Not Buddhists?

 

[Kondor3]

I was just reading this on another site. My gawd how much more are we going to be SLAPPED in our face by this man.

Take heart... keep the faith... January 20, 2017, is just around the corner... hold on.

 

[longknife]

It's his opening the way for Muslims to turn their back on defending this country.

Another plank in his goal to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

You're claiming Muslims are conscientious objectors? That's all the change applies to.

The Muslims seek nothing more than nations obedient to Sharia. What makes you think they'd bear arms to defend out constitution?

 

[pinqy]

It's his opening the way for Muslims to turn their back on defending this country.

Another plank in his goal to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

You're claiming Muslims are conscientious objectors? That's all the change applies to.

The Muslims seek nothing more than nations obedient to Sharia. What makes you think they'd bear arms to defend out constitution?

Because I've served with many Muslims and worked with many Muslim DoD civilians dedicated to wiping out the extremists and terrorists.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Which is more important kids, God or Country? Pick one, and only one.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So.. it's OK to not serve the wartime needs of the US because of religion...
But... it's not OK to not serve the wants of a gay couple because of religion?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So.. it's OK to not serve the wartime needs of the US because of religion...
But... it's not OK to not serve the wants of a gay couple because of religion?

Serving cake versus serving death? Apples and bicycles.

And which is more important, serving God or serving Country?