Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution. All else needs justification...and gradual defunding...and that means entitlements.
What?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution. All else needs justification...and gradual defunding...and that means entitlements.
Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution. All else needs justification...and gradual defunding...and that means entitlements.
What?
Go away idiot, we are tired of hearing lies.February? When was the Republican House sworn in?
You know, the house that controls the purse strings??
...and when have they been able to pass any spending cuts?
The Dems are threatening to shut down the govmint if they do.
You are naive. The GOP doesn't want to cut spending. They had 6 years to do so under Bush.
They're merely posturing, knowing their bluff won't be called.
I'm right. See the post below and feel free to refute it point by point.
I don't refute strawmen.
They're not strawmen just because you say so. What year do you think this is?
Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution. All else needs justification...and gradual defunding...and that means entitlements.
What?
Describes the power of the Congress. Try reading it sometime. You might learn how YOU and your fellow Statist brothers and sisters have been lied to.
See also The Federalist Papers.
What?
Describes the power of the Congress. Try reading it sometime. You might learn how YOU and your fellow Statist brothers and sisters have been lied to.
See also The Federalist Papers.
I know exactly what it refers to. What you posted makes no sense at all. And the Federalist papers are not where laws are derived from in this country. If anything they were written to get the people of New York to "buy in" to the Constitution. As in..become "Statists".
But somehow Swallow? I doubt you will read...it grates against you and your entitlement mentality.
Describes the power of the Congress. Try reading it sometime. You might learn how YOU and your fellow Statist brothers and sisters have been lied to.
See also The Federalist Papers.
I know exactly what it refers to. What you posted makes no sense at all. And the Federalist papers are not where laws are derived from in this country. If anything they were written to get the people of New York to "buy in" to the Constitution. As in..become "Statists".
Don't match wits with me boy...You come here completely unarmed.
What?
Describes the power of the Congress. Try reading it sometime. You might learn how YOU and your fellow Statist brothers and sisters have been lied to.
See also The Federalist Papers.
I know exactly what it refers to. What you posted makes no sense at all. And the Federalist papers are not where laws are derived from in this country. If anything they were written to get the people of New York to "buy in" to the Constitution. As in..become "Statists".
Describes the power of the Congress. Try reading it sometime. You might learn how YOU and your fellow Statist brothers and sisters have been lied to.
See also The Federalist Papers.
I know exactly what it refers to. What you posted makes no sense at all. And the Federalist papers are not where laws are derived from in this country. If anything they were written to get the people of New York to "buy in" to the Constitution. As in..become "Statists".
Stupid ass...they ARE the basis for the Constitution and it's ratification making the Constitution LAW of the LAND...
I know exactly what it refers to. What you posted makes no sense at all. And the Federalist papers are not where laws are derived from in this country. If anything they were written to get the people of New York to "buy in" to the Constitution. As in..become "Statists".
Stupid ass...they ARE the basis for the Constitution and it's ratification making the Constitution LAW of the LAND...
No there not.
They were "OpEds", you moron.
It's no surprise since both Bush and Obama were saddled with the same Congress.What Me worry ?
You can find higher 2007 numbers but that is not the point is it?
I always said, by far the worst thing Obama inherited was the same Congress. That's partially rectified now.
But anyone who thinks spending can be brought under control without a paygo with teeth, and bringing back a version of Gramm-Rudmann that will pass SCOTUS muster and ditto with line-item veto, are fooling themselves.
Only caveat today is, the current makeup of the court might rule in favor of G-R and line-item veto. Congress should pass these again ASAP if they're really serious about a balanced budget.
February? When was the Republican House sworn in?
You know, the house that controls the purse strings??
February? When was the Republican House sworn in?
You know, the house that controls the purse strings??
Even rdean understands that the budget is supposed to be passed in November of the year before. You could, correctly, point out that they only passed a CR to cover spending for two months, bet that actually gets us up to March 4. You cannot blame this one on the Republicans.