Obama: Iran has a "right" to nuclear energy

Where are you getting that from?

I think we should continue to do what we are already doing ... do our best to cut off arms supplies being funneled into Iraq from Iran.

Look, E, it's no secret that nations funnel arms to other nations during war time. We didn't go off and bomb Moscow during the cold war even though we knew they were supplying weapons were killing US soldiers now did we?
We fought wars by proxy. Obviously the consequences of going after the Soviets were steeper than going after Iran.

You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

I was saying comparing Iran to Russia doesn't work, that's all.
 
Where are you getting that from?

I think we should continue to do what we are already doing ... do our best to cut off arms supplies being funneled into Iraq from Iran.

Look, E, it's no secret that nations funnel arms to other nations during war time. We didn't go off and bomb Moscow during the cold war even though we knew they were supplying weapons were killing US soldiers now did we?
We fought wars by proxy. Obviously the consequences of going after the Soviets were steeper than going after Iran.

You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...
 
We fought wars by proxy. Obviously the consequences of going after the Soviets were steeper than going after Iran.

You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...
what troops would you use to accomplish this?
 
We fought wars by proxy. Obviously the consequences of going after the Soviets were steeper than going after Iran.

You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...

How 'bout you lay out your regime change plans, homey?
 
We fought wars by proxy. Obviously the consequences of going after the Soviets were steeper than going after Iran.

You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...

yeah, nothing promotes peace like forcing a regime change on an unwilling population.:cuckoo:
 
Directly, huh?

Got something to back that up?

Does it really matter if it is direct or indirect, as long as they are responsible for supplying terrorists weapons to kill American troops?

When you make the statement "directly murdered" it sure does.

And if you want to play the arms supplying game then the US is directly responsible for all sorts of murders all around the world.

Lets play, when have we supplied arms to governments to kill our troops?
Not only arms, but terrorist weapons such as IED's?
 
You don't think that the consequences of going after Iran aren't steep enough to balk at over some arms getting funneled into Iraq?

Dude, we hit Iran and you can kiss the progress made in Iraq good-bye.

Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...

yeah, nothing promotes peace like forcing a regime change on an unwilling population.:cuckoo:

you don't think they'd support us overthrowing the Mullahs? just asking.
 
Dude, that's fucking hilarious.

Conduct regime change in iran, and the middle east might actually discover peace for the first time, in oh, 1,000 years...

yeah, nothing promotes peace like forcing a regime change on an unwilling population.:cuckoo:

you don't think they'd support us overthrowing the Mullahs? just asking.

no, i don't.

the mullahs may be bastards, but they're their bastards.
nothing unites like a common enemy.
 
Does it really matter if it is direct or indirect, as long as they are responsible for supplying terrorists weapons to kill American troops?

When you make the statement "directly murdered" it sure does.

And if you want to play the arms supplying game then the US is directly responsible for all sorts of murders all around the world.

Lets play, when have we supplied arms to governments to kill our troops?
Not only arms, but terrorist weapons such as IED's?

We supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980's.
 
Does it really matter if it is direct or indirect, as long as they are responsible for supplying terrorists weapons to kill American troops?

When you make the statement "directly murdered" it sure does.

And if you want to play the arms supplying game then the US is directly responsible for all sorts of murders all around the world.

Lets play, when have we supplied arms to governments to kill our troops?
Not only arms, but terrorist weapons such as IED's?


Kill OUR troops? Huh?

And Elvis just gave you a shining example of the US supplying arms to Iraq.
 
yeah, nothing promotes peace like forcing a regime change on an unwilling population.:cuckoo:

you don't think they'd support us overthrowing the Mullahs? just asking.

no, i don't.

the mullahs may be bastards, but they're their bastards.
nothing unites like a common enemy.

You know, when the Germans first invaded Russia, they were greeted as liberators until the SS started enslaving and shooting them. Has there ever been another time when an invader was greeted as a liberator?
 
When you make the statement "directly murdered" it sure does.

And if you want to play the arms supplying game then the US is directly responsible for all sorts of murders all around the world.

Lets play, when have we supplied arms to governments to kill our troops?
Not only arms, but terrorist weapons such as IED's?

We supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980's.

good point, we supported ho chi minh during WWII-same thing
 
I would like to see his military strategy for invading Iran and overthrowing their government.
 

Forum List

Back
Top