Inthemiddle
Rookie
- Oct 4, 2011
- 6,354
- 675
- 0
- Banned
- #61
You'll not put hypocrisy in my mouth. It was NOT okay what Bush did. Secondly, what Bush and his Congress did was a different offense that what Obama and his Congress did. Both are impeachable offenses.
What is the difference in composition between "this" Congress and "that" Congress? "This" Congress cannot rationally impeach Obama for exercising a law, because most of them were part of "that" Congress, that embraced the then President exercising the law.
What are you blathering about?
The problem here is that Obama BROKE the law, therefore his "exercise" was that of a high crime with a potential impeachment. (that will never happen).
Sit down and read slowly. The difference in Congress' membership between now and under Bush's days, is not that dramatic. There are alot of people here now who were in Congress then, and who did not make any objection to Bush exercising the War Powers Act. Since they did not have a problem with it, embraced it as constitutional, etc, they cannot rationally, and will not even try to impeach the President now.