Ihope seems to think laws, rules, treaties and the like should all be designed with him in mind, whereas in a democracy (a democratic Republic in our case), most laws, etc., are intended to resolve problems and conflicts that concern the greater majority of everyone by our Constitutionally elected officials. Short of polling every citizen for input, he's expecting the impossible.
Fits right in with Unalienable Rights, and Habeas Corpus. LOL
There is something wrong with Any Society that has No place for Conscience. Conscience is Rooted in the Individual, not the Group. Keep beating on it though. Locke, Madison, Jefferson, Thoreau, King, Ghandi, would have little in common with the disconnect in Your Ethics.
The Constitution and the USSC has zero to do with ethics. And I love it when one person of a particular political persuasion has the balls to accuse the opposition of being unethical. Did you just climb out from under a rock?
And btw, I had to read your short posting twice in order to absorb the context because it flows like separated sentences. You might as well know anything longer than that one will go unread by me. I don't do anything that takes twice as long these days.
Thank God You were toilet trained before middle school huh? I hope new invention doesn't cause too much hardship. I think You should have spent more effort in History and Civics, and less on grammar. Conscience is the Root of Each of us Maggie. When You deny the Individual, You deny Justice. Your machine was designed to service It's makers, not enslave Them. This is not a partisan matter, but more related to Human Rights. The end does not justify the means Maggie. When the function looses continuity with It's purpose, it becomes damaging. WTFU