Obama Comfort Level Pop Quiz

Who is Obama nicer too?

  • Republicans

    Votes: 6 15.8%
  • Al Qaeda

    Votes: 32 84.2%

  • Total voters
    38
Obama defending the Benghazi murderers, ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam’

Obama on working with the American Legislative branch, something American Presidents have been doing for over 200 years, President Obama slammed House Republicans for "trying to mess with me"

See the difference?

Kill an American Ambassador, you get defended
 
Last edited:
Another dumbass thread from spite and hatred from frank. Im soo00o sure republicans wouod rather be droned and gunned down on the battlefield by the us military........then face the equal partisan banter theyve been throwing at obama for 5yrs.

Im so sure.

Genius.
 
Another dumbass thread from spite and hatred from frank. Im soo00o sure republicans wouod rather be droned and gunned down on the battlefield by the us military........then face the equal partisan banter theyve been throwing at obama for 5yrs.

Im so sure.

Genius.

So Obama has been using drones in Syria? Link?
 
Obama hasnt ordered any al quada killed since he took over as cic, but has killed republicans? Link? Hacks.
 
Another dumbass thread from spite and hatred from frank. Im soo00o sure republicans wouod rather be droned and gunned down on the battlefield by the us military........then face the equal partisan banter theyve been throwing at obama for 5yrs.

Im so sure.

Genius.

So Obama has been using drones in Syria? Link?

news is this morning that the chemical missiles came from Libya

the Russians said they didnt sell that kind to assad

imagine that

Gas missiles 'were not sold to Syria' - Comment - Voices - The Independent
 
What's Obama got to do to get you to stop whining about him?

Do a Reagan-style weapons deal with Iran? :lol:

He could commit suicide. No, even that wouldn't do it because then we would be stuck with Joe Biden.

Wow, such hatred and anger. I guess my smarmy remark about Reagan's arms deals with the Iranian kidnap and terror regime really got under your skin, huh?

Reagan, conservative icon, sold weapons to the Iranians, who had kidnapped our citizens not even ten years earlier. Could you imagine the Rightwing reaction if Obama sold weapons to Iran? It would be fever pitch madness. The fact that Obama hasn't bombed Iran already has many conservatives suffering from a big sad.

I'm just glad the Panamanian-born warmonger McCain, or the non-Christian Romney isn't President now, or we'd be bogged down in Syria and Iran in yet another GOP war of choice.
 
What's Obama got to do to get you to stop whining about him?

Do a Reagan-style weapons deal with Iran? :lol:

These are the same people who didn't want to give him credit for issuing the orders that killed OBL and other top Al Queda officials; there is no cure for GOP butthurt until 2017. So we're in for 3 more years of this 24/7 whine-fest.

Remember back when they were the party of "personal responsibility"? Me neither.
 
What's Obama got to do to get you to stop whining about him?

Do a Reagan-style weapons deal with Iran? :lol:

He could commit suicide. No, even that wouldn't do it because then we would be stuck with Joe Biden.

Wow, such hatred and anger. I guess my smarmy remark about Reagan's arms deals with the Iranian kidnap and terror regime really got under your skin, huh?

Reagan, conservative icon, sold weapons to the Iranians, who had kidnapped our citizens not even ten years earlier. Could you imagine the Rightwing reaction if Obama sold weapons to Iran? It would be fever pitch madness. The fact that Obama hasn't bombed Iran already has many conservatives suffering from a big sad.

I'm just glad the Panamanian-born warmonger McCain, or the non-Christian Romney isn't President now, or we'd be bogged down in Syria and Iran in yet another GOP war of choice.
So I take it you similarly condemn Obama for arming Al Qaeda.



:lmao:
 
He could commit suicide. No, even that wouldn't do it because then we would be stuck with Joe Biden.

Wow, such hatred and anger. I guess my smarmy remark about Reagan's arms deals with the Iranian kidnap and terror regime really got under your skin, huh?

Reagan, conservative icon, sold weapons to the Iranians, who had kidnapped our citizens not even ten years earlier. Could you imagine the Rightwing reaction if Obama sold weapons to Iran? It would be fever pitch madness. The fact that Obama hasn't bombed Iran already has many conservatives suffering from a big sad.

I'm just glad the Panamanian-born warmonger McCain, or the non-Christian Romney isn't President now, or we'd be bogged down in Syria and Iran in yet another GOP war of choice.
So I take it you similarly condemn Obama for arming Al Qaeda.



:lmao:

He's not arming AlQ. Quit lying.

And I oppose any involvement in Syria, which is a no-brainer anyway, and most Americans agree with me on that. I'm glad Obama got out of his redline mistake.

No way Panama-born McCain or Non-Christian Romney does that. They would have bombed years ago.
 
Iran threatens Israel and the world with nuclear weapons.
Al Qaeda stages terrorist attacks around the world
Mexican drug cartels destablize that country.
Syria uses chemical weapons on its own citizens.
The GOP opposes many of Obama's policies.

Guess which one is labeled the number one threat to America by the clusterfuck in chief?

That's because the GOP is in our country right now, doing all kinds of damage, killing Americans with their healthcare, gun and aggressive military and foreign policies.
 
Iran threatens Israel and the world with nuclear weapons.
Al Qaeda stages terrorist attacks around the world
Mexican drug cartels destablize that country.
Syria uses chemical weapons on its own citizens.
The GOP opposes many of Obama's policies.

Guess which one is labeled the number one threat to America by the clusterfuck in chief?

That's because the GOP is in our country right now, doing all kinds of damage, killing Americans with their healthcare, gun and aggressive military and foreign policies.

You're quite the tard, arent you? Virtually every mass killing has been done by a registered Democrat.
 
Wow, such hatred and anger. I guess my smarmy remark about Reagan's arms deals with the Iranian kidnap and terror regime really got under your skin, huh?

Reagan, conservative icon, sold weapons to the Iranians, who had kidnapped our citizens not even ten years earlier. Could you imagine the Rightwing reaction if Obama sold weapons to Iran? It would be fever pitch madness. The fact that Obama hasn't bombed Iran already has many conservatives suffering from a big sad.

I'm just glad the Panamanian-born warmonger McCain, or the non-Christian Romney isn't President now, or we'd be bogged down in Syria and Iran in yet another GOP war of choice.
So I take it you similarly condemn Obama for arming Al Qaeda.



:lmao:

He's not arming AlQ. Quit lying.

And I oppose any involvement in Syria, which is a no-brainer anyway, and most Americans agree with me on that. I'm glad Obama got out of his redline mistake.

No way Panama-born McCain or Non-Christian Romney does that. They would have bombed years ago.
I have no reason to lie.

Obama?s Move to Arm Al Qaeda in Syria | FrontPage Magazine

On Monday, twelve years and five days after al Qaeda precipitated the worst domestic attack in modern history, President Obama waived two sections of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), allowing him to provide military assistance to “vetted” rebel grips in Syria. Though the AECA was designed to prevent arming terrorists, Obama announced that he had the authority to ”waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40(a) of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Section 40, “Transactions With Countries Supporting Acts of International Terrorism,” and Section 40(a), “Prohibited Transactions by the United States Government,” ban sending munitions to any nation described in Section 40 (d), “Countries Covered by Prohibition:” ”The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.”

Section 40(g), “Waiver,” grants the president the power to waive these provisions if he determines “the transaction is essential to the national security interest of the United States.” The same section requires the president to give Congress the name of any country involved in the proposed transaction, the identity of any recipient of the items to be provided pursuant to the proposed transaction, and the anticipated use of those items” at least 15 days before the transaction takes place.

--

Yet unless the Washington Post is inaccurate, Obama has dispensed with the notion that Congress gets their 15-day notification. Five days before the president announced his waiver, the paper revealed that the CIA and the State Department had already begun delivering weapons to Syrian rebels, along with vehicles, advanced communications equipment, and cutting edge medical kits.

Nonetheless, National Security Council Spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden contended that this action will allow the president to provide, “where appropriate, certain non-lethal assistance inside or related to Syria,” (italics mine) ostensibly related to giving rebel forces “life-saving chemical weapons-related assistance” currently prohibited by the AECA. Hayden further noted that the AECA no longer applies to ”international organizations…[and] select vetted members of the Syrian opposition, including the Supreme Military Council.”

The idea that the Obama administration can determine “select vetted members of the opposition” is utter nonsense. A new study by IHS Jane’s, a defense consultancy, estimates that, out of the approximately 100,000 rebels fighting the government of Bashar Assad, 10,000 are jihadists, including foreign fighters linked directly to terrorist organizations like al Qaeda. Another 30,000 to 35,000 are hardline Islamists who share the same sentiments, but are focused on the war in Syria, as opposed to the effort to realize a worldwide Islamic Caliphate. An additional 30,000 are so-called moderates, but even they belong to groups described by IHS Jane’s as having “an Islamic character.” Thus, non-Islamist, secular or nationalist groups comprise a minuscule minority.

--

Charles Lister, who authored the analysis, minced no words. ”The insurgency is now dominated by groups which have at least an Islamist viewpoint on the conflict. The idea that it is mostly secular groups leading the opposition is just not borne out.”

Apparently that reality is irrelevant to the true believers. “Our intelligence agencies, I think, have a very good handle on who to support and who not to support,” said Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) on CBS last Sunday. “And there’s going to be mistakes. We understand some people are going to get arms that should not be getting arms. But we still should be doing everything we can to support the free Syrian opposition.” Sen. John McCain dismissed the IHS Jane’s report completely. “Not true, not true!” he exclaimed, contending there are “about 70 percent still who are Free Syrian Army.”

That would be the same Free Syrian Army that coordinates regular military operations with al Qaeda and other terrorist entities, and the same John McCain who, along with our equally clueless Secretary of State John Kerry, cited research by the now-discredited Elizabeth O’Bagy to back up their assertions. O’Bagy, who was subsequently fired from her “senior analyst” job at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) for lying about her education credentials, has now admitted that her original contention that she had defended her dissertation, and was only waiting for Georgetown University to confer her Ph.D. degree, was also a lie. She never enrolled in the Ph.D. program.

--

Radio host Glenn Beck cut right through that pernicious assertion. He made the irrefutably logical case that if we are providing military aid to the “good guys,” it shouldn’t be necessary to waive sections of a law aimed at preventing terrorists from being armed.

Obama is arming Al Qaeda.
 
how can O'bama work w/ the Repubs? Anyone one of them who considers working w/ our proud African American President to better this great nation is "Primaried-out" in the next mid-term :rofl: You people (repub voters) crack me up :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top