Obama Announces Plan To Destroy Israel

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
I received an email yesterday to which I attributed a certain .....hyperbole.
But, upon research.....it's true.

Here is part of that email:
"I just wanted to write a post here outlining what Obama has been doing in the Middle East while America is rightfully preoccupied with the Obamacare tragedy. Yesterday, John Kerry went on Israeli TV and said that if Israel does not partition the country and create a" Palestinian state" (along borders that are indefensible) he will
1) make sure that Israel is isolated at the UN (that Israel will be declared an illegitimate state or a non state)
2) that he will work to ensure that Europe no longer trades with Israel, thereby strangling the Israeli economy and
3) he said that if "Israel does not comply, there will be violence against it".






1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord....Kerry warned Israelis that the result would be a third intifada of terrorist attacks against Israel.
But that was just for starters.

2. In addition, Kerry said, Israel would be more internationally isolated, there would be increased calls for boycotts and divestment from Israel, and the advent of a Palestinian leadership committed to violence.

3. ....Kerry also denounced Jewish settlements in the West Bank as "illegitimate" and called for an end of the presence of "IDF soldiers perpetually in the West Bank."

4. ....Kerry's remarks fit perfectly with the Palestinian playbook. His anti-Israel outbursts were bound to play well in Ramallah and Amman."
Blog: Kerry Threatens Israel




5. "US Secretary of State John Kerry, using the bully tactics of his boss Barack Obama, warned Israel that if Israeli-Palestinian talks break down, there might be a third intifada. Kerry’s one-sided warning was even more astounding when this fact is thrown in the mix: two days before he shot off his mouth, a poll conducted by the Arab World For Research & Development showed that only 29% of West Bank and Gaza Palestinians would be in favor of a third intifada, even though 60% believe it could happen."
Kerry Threatens Israel with Third Intifada - Townhall.com Staff 11/8/2013 9:05 AM





6. ".... despicable action by Kerry means is that Kerry has now tacitly given a green light for Palestinian terrorists to wage a third intifada against Israel....
Kerry’s threat came during a joint interview with Channel 2's Udi Segal and Maher Shalabi of Palestine TV.... said:

...I believe that if we do not resolve the issues between Palestinians and Israelis, if we do not find a way to find peace, there will be an increasing isolation of Israel, three will be an increasing campaign of the de-legitimization of Israel that has been taking place on an international basis..."

a. Of course, Kerry never mentions the Israelis’ aspirations to simply live in peace without the constant existential threat, but then, the same man who lied about Vietnam atrocities can’t exactly be someone who wants the truth."
Kerry Threatens Israel with Third Intifada






7. "...the Obama administration is working behind the scenes in tandem with the EU’s boycott of Israeli settlements, tying the seriousness of the EU’s future ban to Israel’s actions during current U.S.-brokered talks with the Palestinians, according to a senior Palestinian negotiator....Kerry is using the EU sanctions to blackmail Israel into complying with talks aimed at creating a Palestinian state that would include the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem.....cause incalculable damage to the Israeli economy.”

a. In July, the EU published guidelines that deny EU funds in the form of grants, prizes and financial instruments from going toward any Jewish entities in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Golan Heights or eastern Jerusalem.
Report: Kerry threatening Israel with sanctions



Are there still folks who question where Obama's interests lie?
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

Israel is an ally. palestine is a fictional country.

But fear not, Obama's ties to islam will change all that.
 
And this would be a bad thing, Why?

The Day the Zionist Entity is wiped off the map, the world will be better off for it.



Getting that brown shirt out of mothballs?

How are what the Zionists do to the Palestinians any different than what the Nazis did to the Jews.

The Zionists are like an abused child who has grown big enough to beat up on someone else.

And frankly, are deserving of as much sympathy.
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

Israel is an ally. palestine is a fictional country.

But fear not, Obama's ties to islam will change all that.
Pres. Obama is the first U.S. president to challenge Israel's draconian policies toward Palestine.

And to put America's interests 1st and Israel's a distant second place. ... :thup:
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

I beg to differ. And puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze you have to understand that as an anti lib anti Democrat I will always praise President Clinton for this.

So biting my bottom lip and wishing someone was pulling out my toe nails...

I'm going to give credit where credit is due. Clinton had them on the brink of a solution Between Israel and Palestine. AND OMG THIS IS KILLING ME President Carter negotiated a peace accord with Egypt and Israel



Arafat was making a fortune off this "drama" daily and he was being feted by world leaders

He wasn't going to give up his trade in division.
 
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

Israel is an ally. palestine is a fictional country.

But fear not, Obama's ties to islam will change all that.
Pres. Obama is the first U.S. president to challenge Israel's draconian policies toward Palestine.

And to put America's interests 1st and Israel's a distant second place. ... :thup:



That is simply not true. From the beginning it has been very clear that obama is either a closet muslim or a muslim sympathizer.
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

I beg to differ. And puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze you have to understand that as an anti lib anti Democrat I will always praise President Clinton for this.

So biting my bottom lip and wishing someone was pulling out my toe nails...

I'm going to give credit where credit is due. Clinton had them on the brink of a solution Between Israel and Palestine. AND OMG THIS IS KILLING ME President Carter negotiated a peace accord with Egypt and Israel



Arafat was making a fortune off this "drama" daily and he was being feted by world leaders

He wasn't going to give up his trade in division.

correct, amazing how those on the left forget history----or never knew it.
 
I received an email yesterday to which I attributed a certain .....hyperbole.
But, upon research.....it's true.

Here is part of that email:
"I just wanted to write a post here outlining what Obama has been doing in the Middle East while America is rightfully preoccupied with the Obamacare tragedy. Yesterday, John Kerry went on Israeli TV and said that if Israel does not partition the country and create a" Palestinian state" (along borders that are indefensible) he will
1) make sure that Israel is isolated at the UN (that Israel will be declared an illegitimate state or a non state)
2) that he will work to ensure that Europe no longer trades with Israel, thereby strangling the Israeli economy and
3) he said that if "Israel does not comply, there will be violence against it".






1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord....Kerry warned Israelis that the result would be a third intifada of terrorist attacks against Israel.
But that was just for starters.

2. In addition, Kerry said, Israel would be more internationally isolated, there would be increased calls for boycotts and divestment from Israel, and the advent of a Palestinian leadership committed to violence.

3. ....Kerry also denounced Jewish settlements in the West Bank as "illegitimate" and called for an end of the presence of "IDF soldiers perpetually in the West Bank."

4. ....Kerry's remarks fit perfectly with the Palestinian playbook. His anti-Israel outbursts were bound to play well in Ramallah and Amman."
Blog: Kerry Threatens Israel




5. "US Secretary of State John Kerry, using the bully tactics of his boss Barack Obama, warned Israel that if Israeli-Palestinian talks break down, there might be a third intifada. Kerry’s one-sided warning was even more astounding when this fact is thrown in the mix: two days before he shot off his mouth, a poll conducted by the Arab World For Research & Development showed that only 29% of West Bank and Gaza Palestinians would be in favor of a third intifada, even though 60% believe it could happen."
Kerry Threatens Israel with Third Intifada - Townhall.com Staff 11/8/2013 9:05 AM





6. ".... despicable action by Kerry means is that Kerry has now tacitly given a green light for Palestinian terrorists to wage a third intifada against Israel....
Kerry’s threat came during a joint interview with Channel 2's Udi Segal and Maher Shalabi of Palestine TV.... said:

...I believe that if we do not resolve the issues between Palestinians and Israelis, if we do not find a way to find peace, there will be an increasing isolation of Israel, three will be an increasing campaign of the de-legitimization of Israel that has been taking place on an international basis..."

a. Of course, Kerry never mentions the Israelis’ aspirations to simply live in peace without the constant existential threat, but then, the same man who lied about Vietnam atrocities can’t exactly be someone who wants the truth."
Kerry Threatens Israel with Third Intifada






7. "...the Obama administration is working behind the scenes in tandem with the EU’s boycott of Israeli settlements, tying the seriousness of the EU’s future ban to Israel’s actions during current U.S.-brokered talks with the Palestinians, according to a senior Palestinian negotiator....Kerry is using the EU sanctions to blackmail Israel into complying with talks aimed at creating a Palestinian state that would include the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem.....cause incalculable damage to the Israeli economy.”

a. In July, the EU published guidelines that deny EU funds in the form of grants, prizes and financial instruments from going toward any Jewish entities in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Golan Heights or eastern Jerusalem.
Report: Kerry threatening Israel with sanctions



Are there still folks who question where Obama's interests lie?

the EU thing would have to be confirmed by more than a "Palestinian" negotiator it wouldn't surprise me though
 
And this would be a bad thing, Why?

The Day the Zionist Entity is wiped off the map, the world will be better off for it.



Getting that brown shirt out of mothballs?

How are what the Zionists do to the Palestinians any different than what the Nazis did to the Jews.

The Zionists are like an abused child who has grown big enough to beat up on someone else.

And frankly, are deserving of as much sympathy.




In chapter six of "Terror and Liberalism," Paul Berman anticipates the tropes of rabid anti-Semites like you.....

1. Whatever declension of tropes were offered, they centered on some definition of Zionism that presented it as other than a program of national self-determination for Jews.

a. Zionism is racism, and held up in comparison with the white Republic of South Africa, both practitioners of apartheid. For this one, one must overlook the non-European Jews, and pretend that Israel’s European Jews were colonial settlers rather than refugees.

b. Yet, this trope fails to explain suicide terror in the trope, as even the worst white racism in South Africa, resistance never slipped into this lowest level of nihilism.



2. It became necessary, then, to move to an angrier trope: Israel, a Nazi entity, so devoted to evil that suicide murder becomes an understandable reaction. Of course, one must overlook the fact that Arab nationalism favored Nazism well into the ‘60’s.

a. It was even more difficult to see the Israelis as Nazis given the relatively civilized military tactics of house-to-house fighting, in Jenin in 2002, for example, which cost 23 Israeli lives, vs. 52 Palestinians.
(Second Intifada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Certainly not a Russian-style Grozny battle. “The 1999–2000 battle of Grozny was the siege and assault of the Chechen capital Grozny by Russian forces, lasting from late 1999 to early 2000. The siege and fighting left the capital devastated. In 2003 the United Nations called Grozny the most destroyed city on Earth.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1999–2000)


b. And, with the alacrity of a firehouse dog responding to a bell, there were folks all around the world leaping to conflate Jenin and Auschwitz, and the like.


And sure enough.....here you are.
 
Getting that brown shirt out of mothballs?

How are what the Zionists do to the Palestinians any different than what the Nazis did to the Jews.

The Zionists are like an abused child who has grown big enough to beat up on someone else.

And frankly, are deserving of as much sympathy.




In chapter six of "Terror and Liberalism," Paul Berman anticipates the tropes of rabid anti-Semites like you.....

1. Whatever declension of tropes were offered, they centered on some definition of Zionism that presented it as other than a program of national self-determination for Jews.

a. Zionism is racism, and held up in comparison with the white Republic of South Africa, both practitioners of apartheid. For this one, one must overlook the non-European Jews, and pretend that Israel’s European Jews were colonial settlers rather than refugees.

b. Yet, this trope fails to explain suicide terror in the trope, as even the worst white racism in South Africa, resistance never slipped into this lowest level of nihilism.



2. It became necessary, then, to move to an angrier trope: Israel, a Nazi entity, so devoted to evil that suicide murder becomes an understandable reaction. Of course, one must overlook the fact that Arab nationalism favored Nazism well into the ‘60’s.

a. It was even more difficult to see the Israelis as Nazis given the relatively civilized military tactics of house-to-house fighting, in Jenin in 2002, for example, which cost 23 Israeli lives, vs. 52 Palestinians.
(Second Intifada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Certainly not a Russian-style Grozny battle. “The 1999–2000 battle of Grozny was the siege and assault of the Chechen capital Grozny by Russian forces, lasting from late 1999 to early 2000. The siege and fighting left the capital devastated. In 2003 the United Nations called Grozny the most destroyed city on Earth.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1999–2000)


b. And, with the alacrity of a firehouse dog responding to a bell, there were folks all around the world leaping to conflate Jenin and Auschwitz, and the like.


And sure enough.....here you are.

You're using reason with the unreasonable.
 
1. "Secretary of State John Kerry appears to have shed the last vestige of a U.S. honest broker role in pursuing an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord..
The U.S. has never been an honest broker in any peace talks between Israel and Palestine.

And was always squarely in the Israeli camp against the Palestinians. . :doubt:

I beg to differ. And puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze you have to understand that as an anti lib anti Democrat I will always praise President Clinton for this.

So biting my bottom lip and wishing someone was pulling out my toe nails...

I'm going to give credit where credit is due. Clinton had them on the brink of a solution Between Israel and Palestine. AND OMG THIS IS KILLING ME President Carter negotiated a peace accord with Egypt and Israel



Arafat was making a fortune off this "drama" daily and he was being feted by world leaders

He wasn't going to give up his trade in division.




Glad you posted that.....it is a good reminder of bottomless abyss of Palestinian demands.....



1. In 2000, during Clinton’s last year, he offered to create a Palestinian state. The Israeli prime minister, Barak, agreed to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, part of Jerusalem, and all but a small portion of the West Bank. Clinton made his offer to Yasser Arafat. The offer was refused.


2. The left, of course, immediately decided that Arafat had acted sagely. It was widely believed that Clinton’s offer would have left the new Palestinian state as merely a group of ‘islands,’ unable to project an authentic national Palestinian identity.

a. Clinton’s negotiator, Dennis Ross, explained how this was not the case: the new Palestinian state was entirely contiguous, except for the Gaza Strip. And even Gaza would be connected to the West Bank by an elevated highway and railroad across Israel, thus avoiding Israeli checkpoints. Ross: “And to connect Gaza with the West Bank, there would have been an elevated highway, an elevated railroad, to ensure that there would be not just safe passage for the Palestinians, but free passage.” Dennis Ross on Fox News Sunday | Fox News






3. The result? Hamas and Islamic Jihad came to dominate the Palestinian political scene, the suicide terror campaign began to display popular support, chanting crowds, wailing mothers calling on their children to die, masked young men pledging to do as their mothers asked. There was a suicide bombing of a teenagers’ disco in Tel Aviv in 2001. Weekly random mass murders. Female suicide bombers posthumously celebrated as role models.

a. Yet, throughout the world, scholars, intellectuals, folks in the most sophisticated urban areas, endorsed the Palestinian cause- at its most violent moment. Nail bombs and mutilated bodies in Israel, and yet there were folks rallying for some sort of mass pathology.

b. How to explain movements in which utopia blends with the morgue? How, if we maintain that the world is a rational place, can this be? Rather, there must be a way to conceive of suicide as a rational response to real-life conditions.



4. In the manner that would be familiar to anyone familiar with the history of the French anti-war Socialists, people around the world rushed to find theories that explained that apparent mass pathologies were not actually pathologies, and terror tactics were reasonable and explicable- perhaps even admirable. Islamist ideology was not actually Islamist ideology. Hamas was not Hamas, and, in fact, the goal of suicide bombers was actually a moderate and plausible two-state partition. After all, terror is merely a pressure tactic.

a. Suicide was simply the sign that Palestinians could no longer endure life without a state of their own.

b. Israel’s religious fanatics, by seizing land for settlements, had driven masses of Palestinians out of their minds.

c. Each new act of suicide and murder testified as to how oppressive the Israelis were.

d. Every new atrocity produced a search for new accusations against Israel.
The above also from Paul Berman's textbook.





Insanity abounds.....the coda of same was the election of 2012.......
 
[
In chapter six of "Terror and Liberalism," Paul Berman anticipates the tropes of rabid anti-Semites like you.....

1. Whatever declension of tropes were offered, they centered on some definition of Zionism that presented it as other than a program of national self-determination for Jews.

a. Zionism is racism, and held up in comparison with the white Republic of South Africa, both practitioners of apartheid. For this one, one must overlook the non-European Jews, and pretend that Israel’s European Jews were colonial settlers rather than refugees.

b. Yet, this trope fails to explain suicide terror in the trope, as even the worst white racism in South Africa, resistance never slipped into this lowest level of nihilism.

Actually, the anti-colonial violence in Africa got quite bad in the last stages, including "Necklacing", where they would tie a flaming tire around someone's neck.

The "Non-European" Jews are only a small sliver of the Zionist Entity's population. Most of them are Europeans. That makes them no different than the Afrikaners, who had been there for hundreds of years. It doesn't take away from the fact that Zionism is a form of apartheid- rendering the native people of the land as second class citizens in their own country.


[
2. It became necessary, then, to move to an angrier trope: Israel, a Nazi entity, so devoted to evil that suicide murder becomes an understandable reaction. Of course, one must overlook the fact that Arab nationalism favored Nazism well into the ‘60’s.

Not sure what you mean by "Favored Nazism". A few Arabs thought that getting rid of their colonial masters would mean independence, so they saw the Nazis as a good thing. But mostly, they signed up and fought for the allies, with the UNDERSTANDING that after the war, the British and French get the fuck out of their countries, finally.

Zionism was initially an attempt by the UK to maintain a toehold.




[
b. And, with the alacrity of a firehouse dog responding to a bell, there were folks all around the world leaping to conflate Jenin and Auschwitz, and the like.


And sure enough.....here you are.

Yawn, the point is, the Zionists are invaders. They don't belong there any more than the Afrikanners belonged in South Africa.

The whole world has really gotten sick and tired of the Zionists playing the HIlter Card to excuse their bad behavior.

But you know why I really want to see Israel expunged from the map?

Because then all these stupid people who talk about God will finally wake and realize there isn't one.

This can only be a positive development.
 
The "Non-European" Jews are only a small sliver of the Zionist Entity's population. Most of them are Europeans. That makes them no different than the Afrikaners, who had been there for hundreds of years. It doesn't take away from the fact that Zionism is a form of apartheid- rendering the native people of the land as second class citizens in their own country.

Wrong most of the Arabs came in from the surrounding areas and there was no country.. also a "small sliver"? you're an idiot.....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuq3GnOXXjg]Silent Exodus - The Jewish Nakbah - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top