Obama announces debt deal--GOP/Tea Party members WIN big!

[taichiliberal]

Once again it's a total victory for the government loving left. What a sell out to liberty Boehner and the Republicans are. Which is why I left the party in 1992 rather then vote for HW's slow death over the Democrat's quick one. Years down the line when future congresses can simply reverse it we'll cut. In the mean time we continue to borrow 40% of what our government spends.

Bohehner and the Republican congress, fuck you and the fart that blew you in. Once again you fucked your country to get re-elected. Congratulations, you're next in line after the 1995 congress for taking a stand and then selling us out.

The neocon GOP thought they could create, use and then discard the teabaggers...instead, they got a royal fuck up that exposes the anti-New Deal agenda of the neocons....which has TOTALLY FUCKED UP THIS COUNTRY.

We "borrow" because we spend on illegal wars (but keep them off the books), deregulate Wall St. and the banks and then don't prosecute them when the steal, give tax breaks and cuts to millionaires and mega-corporations that don't need them.

Any future congress that tries to revisit reagonomics on steriods should be shot on sight.

Anti-New Deal? If I am not mistaken the Neocons like George Bush pushed for TARP. I wish they were Anti-New Deal. The New Deal was a complete failure, as clearly demonstrated by the length of the Great Depression.

Your revisionism is astounding. The Depression was NOT dependent or a result of the New Deal. Here, for your education: The New Deal or Radical Change

As for TARP...it was a Hail Mary Pass by the Shrub and company who had to deal with the results of their deregulation of the banks and Wall St., which brought us the mortgage-scam that was a major player in our current fiasco. A day late and a dollar short...while NOT accepting responsiblity for causing the damned problem in the first place.

 

[taichiliberal]

Any future congress that tries to revisit reagonomics on steriods should be shot on sight.

Sure, shoot people who protect Americans from being plundered. You WILL be looted or we'll blow you away!!!! Before you just wanted to arrest us. I guess you're getting more desperate now that someone's actually on our side against government.

Okay, let me ease your furrowed brow....I was initially speaking metaphorically.

Now, who will be "looted", Kaz? So far, it's been the American people thanks to a neocon driven GOP controlled 3 branches of gov't under the Shrub. And if the actions of the little teabagger cretins that were elected to governorships in 2010 haven't clued you in as to who is being "looted", then I can help your case of denial.

 

[taichiliberal]

the Tea Party ... these folk ain't your Daddy's Republicans....

QFT, and thank God. My daddy's Republicans are why I left the party. They were just Democrat lites.

Right....Nixon and Reagn were "Democrats lite". Spoken like a true Tea Party/new conservative/libertarian idealogue, Kaz.

They are extreme idealogues who are hell bent of repealing FDR's New Deal and all that sprang from it since....thinking this time they'll get it right!

Right, government went from 20% of GDP which was way too high to 25% and only an "extreme ideologue" would oppose that. You are the extreme ideologue refusing to deal with what your socialist policies are doing to destroy the West even a little. Government cannot be cut no matter how poor we all become, the precedent of an actual cut would just be too risky. People may wake up and realize the sun still comes up tomorrow without government taking credit for it. Extreme...ideologue...look in the mirror.

WTF are you babbling about, Kaz? From where and when did you pull your little statistic? And given that we are living the RESULTS of the alleged largess of a deregulated "free market", all your anti-gov't bullhorn, is just that...bull.

GEt it through your thick neocon/teabagger/libertarian skull, Kaz....every belessed time the corporations and private enterprise fuck up, the average working guy is not going to pick up the slack by forgoing social services that they have paid into via taxes for years. Got that bunky? Because if you don't, then write a check to give back those two stimulus payouts the Shrub gave you, and then stay the hell off the highways that the gov't ws instrumental in creating, filter your won water, grade the quality of your own food, go yell at the factory that puts an unfilitered smokestack next to your home yourself.

Or just stop parroting your BS, grow the fuck up and deal with reality.

 

[Neotrotsky]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, in light of the events in the markets and with the debt ceiling over the past few days,

it's nice to see the title of this thread still alive and kicking.

Good observation, dill weed. The thread title has remained unchanged.

You idiot.

So you acknowledge that the GOP and the Tea Partiers got what they wanted...

...a budget deal that gave the stock market a 700 point haircut and got our credit rating lowered.

 

[Full-Auto]

Well, in light of the events in the markets and with the debt ceiling over the past few days,

it's nice to see the title of this thread still alive and kicking.

Good observation, dill weed. The thread title has remained unchanged.

You idiot.

So you acknowledge that the GOP and the Tea Partiers got what they wanted...

...a budget deal that gave the stock market a 700 point haircut and got our credit rating lowered.

Not even close. If they had gotten what they wanted a downgrade would not have occurred.

 

[taichiliberal]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

And what is this spending being put to, my intellectually stunted Neo? And why is it necessary? From your source:


In fact, the only other years since 1950 in which federal spending exceeded 23 percent of GDP came in 1982 and 1983, with 23.1 percent and 23.5 percent, respectively. That was during and immediately after the last recession that rivaled the current one in severity, the 1981-82 recession. Economic downturns tend to affect this statistic because they slow GDP and increase the demand for government services. Even without special stimulus measures, spending goes up for mandatory items such as food stamps.

So in 1983, under a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, the government spent just 1.2 percentage points less than the current level, which suggests that the recession shouldn't be ignored as a major reason why spending is so high.

Next time, think it through before you try to make a snide and condescending remark, Neo....makes you look less of a fool than you are.

 

[Full-Auto]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

And what is this spending being put to, my intellectually stunted Neo? And why is it necessary?

Redundant programs, what else? It was your side that cranked it up, so you tell us.

 

[Neotrotsky]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

And what is this spending being put to, my intellectually stunted Neo? And why is it necessary?

Too funny
insults coming from the guy who did not know the fact was true
or where to find it

 

[taichiliberal]

Good observation, dill weed. The thread title has remained unchanged.

You idiot.

So you acknowledge that the GOP and the Tea Partiers got what they wanted...

...a budget deal that gave the stock market a 700 point haircut and got our credit rating lowered.

Not even close. If they had gotten what they wanted a downgrade would not have occurred.

Only in the imaginations of moronic teabaggers and wishful thinking neocons. Oh well, all this crap starts again in a few months....only this time it's up to a bi-partisan gov't of six, with the President having the deciding vote.

And remember, your gods the Republicans voted this in as acceptable! Bon Appetite.

 

[taichiliberal]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

And what is this spending being put to, my intellectually stunted Neo? And why is it necessary?

Too funny
insults coming from the guy who did not know the fact was true
or where to find it

From your source:


In fact, the only other years since 1950 in which federal spending exceeded 23 percent of GDP came in 1982 and 1983, with 23.1 percent and 23.5 percent, respectively. That was during and immediately after the last recession that rivaled the current one in severity, the 1981-82 recession. Economic downturns tend to affect this statistic because they slow GDP and increase the demand for government services. Even without special stimulus measures, spending goes up for mandatory items such as food stamps.

So in 1983, under a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, the government spent just 1.2 percentage points less than the current level, which suggests that the recession shouldn't be ignored as a major reason why spending is so high.

Next time, think it through before you try to make a snide and condescending remark, Neo....makes you look less of a fool than you are.

 

[Neotrotsky]

The link was there

Liberals are so lazy

 

[taichiliberal]

PolitiFact

federal spending has risen to 25 percent of GDP -true

A left leaning website to be sure

Of course, they could be part of the
evil republican cabal now

And what is this spending being put to, my intellectually stunted Neo? And why is it necessary?

Redundant programs, what else? It was your side that cranked it up, so you tell us.

Here's "what else", you willfully ignorant cretin. Try actually doing some homework yourself instead of letting right wingnut radio/blog sites do your thinking for you.

From Neo's source:


In fact, the only other years since 1950 in which federal spending exceeded 23 percent of GDP came in 1982 and 1983, with 23.1 percent and 23.5 percent, respectively. That was during and immediately after the last recession that rivaled the current one in severity, the 1981-82 recession. Economic downturns tend to affect this statistic because they slow GDP and increase the demand for government services. Even without special stimulus measures, spending goes up for mandatory items such as food stamps.

So in 1983, under a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, the government spent just 1.2 percentage points less than the current level, which suggests that the recession shouldn't be ignored as a major reason why spending is so high.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Which reminds me

Are you still making up facts and pulling them out of your arse?
Yeah you really can't be trusted when it comes to facts




PoltitFact says it is true
Right wing- who knew

I will be sure to let them know
that you think they are wrong

 

[taichiliberal]

The link was there

Liberals are so lazy

The link YOU provided clearly proves that the reason for the 5% increase was due to dealing with the RECESSION, you willfully ignornant neocon numbskull!

Next time, try reading carefully and comprehensively what YOU use as a source of information Neo....it'll make you look less stupid when you try to mis-represent it's conclusions.

Say goodnight, Gracie...shows over for you.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Let us stay focused on the issue
You said:
"WTF are you babbling about, Kaz? From where and when did you pull your little statistic?"

The link proves the poster was correct
and you were wrong

as the barber says- next

You can try to turn the post into something else
to cover up for your ignorance; but really
posting on more subjects does not help you

Red font? I'm sure it is only a matter of time before the BIG FONT comes out


I really don't see the big thing
you should be use to being wrong on facts

 

[taichiliberal]

Which reminds me

Are you still making up facts and pulling them out of your arse?
Yeah you really can't be trusted when it comes to facts




PoltitFact says it is true
Right wing- who knew

I will be sure to let them know
that you think they are wrong

Once again, our mental midget Neo just keeps parroting ONE aspect of information while desperately ignoring everything else.

From the source Neo gave:


In fact, the only other years since 1950 in which federal spending exceeded 23 percent of GDP came in 1982 and 1983, with 23.1 percent and 23.5 percent, respectively. That was during and immediately after the last recession that rivaled the current one in severity, the 1981-82 recession. Economic downturns tend to affect this statistic because they slow GDP and increase the demand for government services. Even without special stimulus measures, spending goes up for mandatory items such as food stamps.

So in 1983, under a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, the government spent just 1.2 percentage points less than the current level, which suggests that the recession shouldn't be ignored as a major reason why spending is so high.

Since Neo is too dumb and/or stubborn to grasp what is going on, folks...I'll dumb it down for him:

I don't deny the 5% increase, but like Politifact, I just point out the REASON for it....which is NOT the "it's Obama's fault" scenario that Neo and his fellow neocon numbskulls want to squawk about.

Now flustered by the truth, Neo proceeds to make bogus accusations and statements that the chronology of the posts just doesn't support.

I leave Neo to repeat his failure in various ways, as it's pointless to argue with insipidly stubborn neocons.

 

[taichiliberal]

Let us stay focused on the issue
You said:
"WTF are you babbling about, Kaz? From where and when did you pull your little statistic?"

The link proves the poster was correct
and you were wrong

as the barber says- next

You can try to turn the post into something else
to cover up for your ignorance; but really
posting on more subjects does not help you

Red font? I'm sure it is only a matter of time before the BIG FONT comes out


I really don't see the big thing
you should be use to being wrong on facts

And here is why Neo is just one stupid SOB who isn't worth bothering with at this point, folks.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3970225-post525.html

 

[Neotrotsky]

Dumb is when someone can not admit they were wrong

you really are pathetic; do you really think you are fooling
anyone with your sophomoric attempt to cover up for being wrong
"Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall."

Show some guts and man up to being wrong
It would make you look less disingenuous and
maybe get you some more rep points


speaking of pathetic

Other cases of you pulling facts from your arse

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama is doing quite well in the polls.

RealClearPolitics - Latest Election Polls