Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And there is a LEGAL process to make that happen, you don't get to ignore it cause you feel like it. You want rights removed? Get the guy before a Judge and have the Judge rule he is Incompetent. THAT is the law dumbfuck.Mentally ill nuts shouldn't have access to guns.
Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
What the NRA is doing is propagating a slippery slope fallacy; that if we enact necessary, proper, and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures – such as a UBC – ‘gun confiscation’ is soon to follow.Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
you do know that 'mentally ill' is not the same as those who were banned under the GCA of 68, codified at 18 USC 922 et seq. The NRA supports the rights of American citizens to own firearms-as long as they have not been legally barred from doing so. Is it your learned argument that anyone with a mental illness is barred from owning guns? Or are you so hateful of gun rights that you want to deny everyone the ability to own firearms? Either way, your pissy hatred of the NRA is based on dishonesty.Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
What the NRA is doing is propagating a slippery slope fallacy; that if we enact necessary, proper, and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures – such as a UBC – ‘gun confiscation’ is soon to follow.Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
Needless to say the notion is idiocy.
The fact is that having a mental condition or disorder will not render someone a prohibited person; only an individual adjudicated by a magistrate to be a threat to himself and others the consequence of his mental condition will be placed in the NICS database.
And those with a mental condition or disorder will always be afforded the right to due process to demonstrate they should no longer be designated a prohibited person.
I would say those who pretend that the second amendment does not cover anyone other than those adjudicated incompetent to exercise the right, are mentally ill and most likely mentally deficient.Why does the NRA defend mentally ill people to have access to guns?
Is that what they want? Or do they not want someone's constitutional rights removed so easily.
No one wants a delusional sociopath to have guns. But I have been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder. That is a mental illness. Will I lose my right to own firearms? What if the lunatic rightwingers get homosexuality listed as a mental illness again? Do they lose their constitutional rights?
We already have the NICS background check that refuses a sale of a firearm to anyone who, among other things "Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution".