Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Cruz in Texas was outspent 3 to 1 and still soundly defeated the establishment opponent. 57/43
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay..... Now why should I care?
I think it would be more accurate to say; "The Election is being bought for him".Okay..... Now why should I care?
I just thought it was relative to all the accusations that Romney is buying the election.
Okay..... Now why should I care?
I just thought it was relative to all the accusations that Romney is buying the election.
Hate to say it, but not one modern eletion has ever been won without being able to pay for a good campaign.
It takes money to win...
Hate to say it, but not one modern eletion has ever been won without being able to pay for a good campaign.
It takes money to win...
Hate to say it, but not one modern eletion has ever been won without being able to pay for a good campaign.
It takes money to win...
Hate to say it, but not one modern eletion has ever been won without being able to pay for a good campaign.
It takes money to win...
The real interesting thing is to pay attention to who's going to buy voters with taxpayer's money with promises to do for voters things they should be doing for themselves.
Tea party republican, vs "true" republican. Outspent 3 to 1?Cruz in Texas was outspent 3 to 1 and still soundly defeated the establishment opponent. 57/43
You libbies are funny. When one gop member does or says something it is applied to the entire party. I then apply that same logic to something with a positive outcome and you throw a fit.
Of course this doesn't pertain to every election. I didn't say it did. The fact is he could have outspent his opponent and still won on his message. There is almost know way to tell what impact cash vs message has.
You libbies are funny. When one gop member does or says something it is applied to the entire party. I then apply that same logic to something with a positive outcome and you throw a fit.
Of course this doesn't pertain to every election. I didn't say it did. The fact is he could have outspent his opponent and still won on his message. There is almost know way to tell what impact cash vs message has.