- Thread starter
- #21
And the little life is still dead. You can try to justify it but in the end, the result is death.
So you're against abortions in situations of rape and incest correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the little life is still dead. You can try to justify it but in the end, the result is death.
Yes, but the end result is still death. My answer isn't the right one.And the little life is still dead. You can try to justify it but in the end, the result is death.
So you're against abortions in situations of rape and incest correct?
Yes, but the end result is still death. My answer isn't the right one.And the little life is still dead. You can try to justify it but in the end, the result is death.
So you're against abortions in situations of rape and incest correct?
Yes, but the end result is still death. My answer isn't the right one.So you're against abortions in situations of rape and incest correct?
That should be a personal choice.
Yes, but the end result is still death. My answer isn't the right one.
That should be a personal choice.
I agree. I think I meant no on the previous response.
That should be a personal choice.
I agree. I think I meant no on the previous response.
That's what confuses me about those of you who talk about an early term fetus having it's own life, yet you say you're ok with it being forced to end just because of how the pregnancy came about.
That doesn't really sound like being strictly pro-life in principle to me, tons of gray area.
That should be a personal choice.
I agree. I think I meant no on the previous response.
That's what confuses me about those of you who talk about an early term fetus having it's own life, yet you say you're ok with it being forced to end just because of how the pregnancy came about.
That doesn't really sound like being strictly pro-life in principle to me, tons of gray area.
Abortion is the prime example of a zero compromise issue for some people. It is also similar to the gun control debate, where the side on defense (abortion rights/gun rights people) take a slippery slope attitude to any percived infringement of said right. Some pro choicers see ANY attempt at infringement as having the eventual goal of ending the legality of abortion, and in some cases they are right.
To me it all comes down to the situation. When it comes to physical medical reasons, and non consuensual sex of any stripe, abortion is a legitamate method of correcting the situation.
That being said, abortion used as a form of better late than never birth control is pretty fucked up. A person has many methods of not getting pregnant, and to end a life just because you don't feel like accepting the results of your actions is just asshattery to me.
The big debate will come when we are able to easily quanitfy a fetuses qualities using chromosonal testing. At that point, the question becomes far murkier, for example if a "gay" gene somehow exists, and can be tested for, should aborting said fetus be legal?
Not much difference between being pro-life and pro-choice
I agree. I think I meant no on the previous response.
That's what confuses me about those of you who talk about an early term fetus having it's own life, yet you say you're ok with it being forced to end just because of how the pregnancy came about.
That doesn't really sound like being strictly pro-life in principle to me, tons of gray area.
I agree with the gray areas. I'm against abortions but if a woman is forced ie rape, incest, she should have a say. Again, it's still killing and I don't have the right answers.
I assume that you're pro-choice? And against the death penalty?
Not much difference between being pro-life and pro-choice
One rather large difference is this:
The Pro-choice folks do not want to insinuate themselves into other woman's reproductive choices.
The Pro-life folks think they have the right to tell women when to procreate.
That is a rather sigificant difference in my opinion.
I agree. I think I meant no on the previous response.
That's what confuses me about those of you who talk about an early term fetus having it's own life, yet you say you're ok with it being forced to end just because of how the pregnancy came about.
That doesn't really sound like being strictly pro-life in principle to me, tons of gray area.
I agree with the gray areas. I'm against abortions but if a woman is forced ie rape, incest, she should have a say. Again, it's still killing and I don't have the right answers.
I assume that you're pro-choice? And against the death penalty?
That's what confuses me about those of you who talk about an early term fetus having it's own life, yet you say you're ok with it being forced to end just because of how the pregnancy came about.
That doesn't really sound like being strictly pro-life in principle to me, tons of gray area.
I agree with the gray areas. I'm against abortions but if a woman is forced ie rape, incest, she should have a say. Again, it's still killing and I don't have the right answers.
I assume that you're pro-choice? And against the death penalty?
Incorrect, I'm pro-choice, and think the death penalty is way under-utilized.
Are you pro-life and hardcore anti-war?
Not much difference between being pro-life and pro-choice
One rather large difference is this:
The Pro-choice folks do not want to insinuate themselves into other woman's reproductive choices.
The Pro-life folks think they have the right to tell women when to procreate.
That is a rather sigificant difference in my opinion.
Read the whole OP, it'll show why there's not much diff.
Pro-choice folks do want to insinuate themselves into other women's reporductive choices late in the pregnancy, except for the pro-partial birth abortion loons.
Most pro-life folks are ok with women not procreating once pregnant if by rape or incest.
I agree with the gray areas. I'm against abortions but if a woman is forced ie rape, incest, she should have a say. Again, it's still killing and I don't have the right answers.
I assume that you're pro-choice? And against the death penalty?
Incorrect, I'm pro-choice, and think the death penalty is way under-utilized.
Are you pro-life and hardcore anti-war?
Per your question, I'm for life and against fighting unless we're attacked. Hope that answers your question.
One rather large difference is this:
The Pro-choice folks do not want to insinuate themselves into other woman's reproductive choices.
The Pro-life folks think they have the right to tell women when to procreate.
That is a rather sigificant difference in my opinion.
Read the whole OP, it'll show why there's not much diff.
Pro-choice folks do want to insinuate themselves into other women's reporductive choices late in the pregnancy, except for the pro-partial birth abortion loons.
Most pro-life folks are ok with women not procreating once pregnant if by rape or incest.
Where are you getting these sweeping generalizations about who believes what? Cite to some authority, please.
Yet Hypocritical Republicans claim to be pro life, yet pro capital punishment