“Not bluffing” about using military force against Iran

[Billo_Really]

Brig. Gen. Hajizadeh made this an issue with the following as other Iranian officials have.

"Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are "within the reach of our missiles" and could be hit "in the early minutes after an attack," according to an English-language report from Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency. The bases were no threat but instead an "opportunity" for the Iranian military, Hajizadeh said last month, according to Fars."

Iran: We Can Hit 35 US Bases in 'Minutes' - ABC News

My, aren't we the disengenous one?

Taking a quote out of context just to prove your bullshit lie.

That was said as a response to a US attack.

An Iranian military commander said that his country has detailed contingency plans to strike nearly three dozen U.S. military bases in the region should Iran be attacked, Iranian media reported Wednesday.

Context is everything and we both know why you omitted it.

 

[Connery]

Brig. Gen. Hajizadeh made this an issue with the following as other Iranian officials have.

"Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are "within the reach of our missiles" and could be hit "in the early minutes after an attack," according to an English-language report from Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency. The bases were no threat but instead an "opportunity" for the Iranian military, Hajizadeh said last month, according to Fars."

Iran: We Can Hit 35 US Bases in 'Minutes' - ABC News

My, aren't we the disengenous one?

Taking a quote out of context just to prove your bullshit lie.

That was said as a response to a US attack.

An Iranian military commander said that his country has detailed contingency plans to strike nearly three dozen U.S. military bases in the region should Iran be attacked, Iranian media reported Wednesday.

Context is everything and we both know why you omitted it.

Nope the fact that the person said this is enough for any responsible party to take the statement at face value and prepare for such a contingency. If you would like to go that route what according to Iran what constitutes and attack?

 

[Billo_Really]

Nope the fact that the person said this is enough for any responsible party to take the statement at face value and prepare for such a contingency. If you would like to go that route what according to Iran what constitutes and attack?

The context in which something is said, means everything as to what their point was in saying it.

Nice try, though!

 

[Connery]

Nope the fact that the person said this is enough for any responsible party to take the statement at face value and prepare for such a contingency. If you would like to go that route what according to Iran what constitutes and attack?

The context in which something is said, means everything as to what their point was in saying it.

Nice try, though!

I asked you a direct question for which you have not responded.

 

[ima]

Since when has the Iranian issue became our issue? Israel should deal with its own concerns. Once again these moronic lowlife's fell for the media trick yet again. You guys are brainwashed so easily.

Brig. Gen. Hajizadeh made this an issue with the following as other Iranian officials have.

"Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are "within the reach of our missiles" and could be hit "in the early minutes after an attack," according to an English-language report from Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency. The bases were no threat but instead an "opportunity" for the Iranian military, Hajizadeh said last month, according to Fars."

Iran: We Can Hit 35 US Bases in 'Minutes' - ABC News

Just because they can reach them doesn't mean they will, because they know that we'd bomb them back to the stone age. So stop drooling, it ain't gonna happen.

 

[Too Tall]

Iran already kicked our ass TWICE!!!!!!!! I wouldn't mess with Iran, they are bad people.

Don't know what drugs you are on but Iran has never "kicked our ass" lol

1) The hostages which brought down a president, and 2) the rescue mission that was shot down.

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

The rescue mission was aborted when one of the helicopters collided with a C-130 , killing 8 soldiers. No one was shot down.

 

[ima]

Don't know what drugs you are on but Iran has never "kicked our ass" lol

1) The hostages which brought down a president, and 2) the rescue mission that was shot down.

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

The rescue mission was aborted when one of the helicopters collided with a C-130 , killing 8 soldiers. No one was shot down.

You can believe anything you want, but that mission was shot down. No way they crash into EACH OTHER!!!!

 

[Connery]

Since when has the Iranian issue became our issue? Israel should deal with its own concerns. Once again these moronic lowlife's fell for the media trick yet again. You guys are brainwashed so easily.

Brig. Gen. Hajizadeh made this an issue with the following as other Iranian officials have.

"Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are "within the reach of our missiles" and could be hit "in the early minutes after an attack," according to an English-language report from Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency. The bases were no threat but instead an "opportunity" for the Iranian military, Hajizadeh said last month, according to Fars."

Iran: We Can Hit 35 US Bases in 'Minutes' - ABC News

Just because they can reach them doesn't mean they will, because they know that we'd bomb them back to the stone age. So stop drooling, it ain't gonna happen.

Whether it happens or not, preparedness is the keystone to an effective defense.

 

[ima]

Brig. Gen. Hajizadeh made this an issue with the following as other Iranian officials have.

"Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are "within the reach of our missiles" and could be hit "in the early minutes after an attack," according to an English-language report from Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency. The bases were no threat but instead an "opportunity" for the Iranian military, Hajizadeh said last month, according to Fars."

Iran: We Can Hit 35 US Bases in 'Minutes' - ABC News

Just because they can reach them doesn't mean they will, because they know that we'd bomb them back to the stone age. So stop drooling, it ain't gonna happen.

Whether it happens or not, preparedness is the keystone to an effective defense.

Not messing with shit that doesn't concern you is also effective.

 

[WethePeopleUS]

There's no more a nuclear threat from Iran than there was from Iraq.

Iran has MASSIVE oil deposits, in fact they're supplying much of Europe at $8/gallon.

Oil is what the warmongering is all about, kiddies.

Oil.

So I fail to see how Iranian oil exports to Europe have any bearing on our status with them. Perhaps if we imported oil from Iran, then maybe you can say "it's all about oil." You know how much oil we import from Iran: 0%

We actually import our oil from Canada, Latin America, and parts of Africa. Since the oil embargo's of the 70's and 80's the U.S. has sought to decrease it's dependency on Arab oil.

Where Does America Get Oil? You May Be Surprised : NPR

For the first time in a while, I think it is safe to say that our beef with Iran IS for the weapons they are trying to acquire. We have never been threatening war with Iran over any other issue. We have not once said, that we are going after them because of their humanitarian violations. We have never said we are going after their oil, while in fact we are trying to get all of their oil customers to stop purchasing from them. We have never said we were going after them when they created their surrogate terrorist group Hezbollah. What we HAVE said we will go after them for is their creation of a nuclear weapon. I do not see where the confusion is....

It's pretty simple. We have stated that we will not allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons. If they proceed, against our wishes, as well as the international community, and seek to develop a nuclear weapon, we will stop them.

Groundwork for war has already begun to circulate within the Senate. A bipartisan resolution was introduced last week to fully support Israel militarily, politically, and economically if they commit to engaging Iran in a military conflict. This first resolution lays the groundwork for the Senate to authorize the President FULL USE of the American war machine. So in short, our government is gearing for war. The paperwork is already started.

 

[Connery]

Just because they can reach them doesn't mean they will, because they know that we'd bomb them back to the stone age. So stop drooling, it ain't gonna happen.

Whether it happens or not, preparedness is the keystone to an effective defense.

Not messing with shit that doesn't concern you is also effective.

They wish to talk about negatively effecting US interests then of course it concerns the US.

 

[WethePeopleUS]

1) The hostages which brought down a president, and 2) the rescue mission that was shot down.

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

The rescue mission was aborted when one of the helicopters collided with a C-130 , killing 8 soldiers. No one was shot down.

You can believe anything you want, but that mission was shot down. No way they crash into EACH OTHER!!!!

Actually in the 70's when we didn't have all the high-tech equipment we have now it is very possible. They started the mission when it was still dark outside, and there was a really bad sandstorm that the choppers had to fly through. Visibility was poor, and technical malfunctions in the chopper caused it to crash with one of the supporting gun ships. YOU can believe whatever you want, however the rest of us will stick to the facts lol

 

[ima]

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

The rescue mission was aborted when one of the helicopters collided with a C-130 , killing 8 soldiers. No one was shot down.

You can believe anything you want, but that mission was shot down. No way they crash into EACH OTHER!!!!

Actually in the 70's when we didn't have all the high-tech equipment we have now it is very possible. They started the mission when it was still dark outside, and there was a really bad sandstorm that the choppers had to fly through. Visibility was poor, and technical malfunctions in the chopper caused it to crash with one of the supporting gun ships. YOU can believe whatever you want, however the rest of us will stick to the facts lol

Where did you get your "facts"? from the same people who CLAIM to have killed Osama bin Laden?

 

[Too Tall]

1) The hostages which brought down a president, and 2) the rescue mission that was shot down.

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

The rescue mission was aborted when one of the helicopters collided with a C-130 , killing 8 soldiers. No one was shot down.

You can believe anything you want, but that mission was shot down. No way they crash into EACH OTHER!!!!

I supervised the installation of the navigation equipment on the helicopters and was on the USS Nimitz when they launched. We listened to the radio calls from Desert One after the crash.

Where is your source of any aircraft being shot down?

 

[Billo_Really]

Well, instead of rounding up Iranians and putting them in OVENS, we should boil them in oil pumped right off there own land, we can fire up that boiling oil with the reactor they built. I know this sounds fucked up the Iranians are a threat to the earths jean-pull.
We might as well say that Iran is going to get fucked up for GP, it doesn't matter what the fuck they do, there finished.

Oh yea the UN, who gives a fuck about laws they create and are unable to enforce upon a nation with insurmountable strength.

You make such a good German!

 

[Billo_Really]

I asked you a direct question for which you have not responded.

You're actually asking what constitutes an attack?

Getting bombed! That's an attack.

 

[Billo_Really]

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

You know what caused the hostage crisis, don't you?

It's what our CIA did to that country in 1953.

 

[hoosier88]

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

You know what caused the hostage crisis, don't you?

It's what our CIA did to that country in 1953.

(My bold)

L. is being kind. It was Prexy Eisenhower (& the ever-champing @ the bit Dulles bros. - John Foster @ Dept. State, Allen @ DCIA) who allowed themselves to be talked (by MI-5) into overthrowing PM Mossadegh, a legimitately elected head of state. Prexy Truman had been approached by the UK - miffed about Iran nationalizing "their" oil concession - & Truman said No - we don't do that (Iran had been our ally in WWII - well, the country was de facto partitioned between the USSR on the north & the UK on the south, but still), & that's an internal affair to Iran.

When Eisenhower was coming in, UK changed the pitch to anti-Communism - & Eisenhower & the Dulles Bros. bit on the bait.

 

[Too Tall]

Taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage was an act of war, and the President was too weak to do anything about it. The American people replaced him.

You know what caused the hostage crisis, don't you?

It's what our CIA did to that country in 1953.

Actually, it was Carter deposing the Shah and installing the Ayatollah. Untill that happened we had a lot of Americans in Iran, including oil company employess and defense technicians. Read Ken Follett's book "On Wings of Eagles" for background.

I taught Iranians how to operate their C-130's at Lockheed and had a number of friends IN Iran to continue pilot and maintenance training while the Shah was in power. Then came the Ayatollah's and they all were forced out of the country.

 

[WethePeopleUS]

You can believe anything you want, but that mission was shot down. No way they crash into EACH OTHER!!!!

Actually in the 70's when we didn't have all the high-tech equipment we have now it is very possible. They started the mission when it was still dark outside, and there was a really bad sandstorm that the choppers had to fly through. Visibility was poor, and technical malfunctions in the chopper caused it to crash with one of the supporting gun ships. YOU can believe whatever you want, however the rest of us will stick to the facts lol

Where did you get your "facts"? from the same people who CLAIM to have killed Osama bin Laden?

Ok conversation over. You are clearly too ignorant to have a logical conversation with lol Ohh hey, how is Elvis doing? Is he hanging out with 2pac and Biggie, and John Lenin down in Jamaica with Bob Marley hahaha