NO WMD's? Guess again,,,,

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by LuvRPgrl, Feb 9, 2006.

  1. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    43,743
    Thanks Received:
    9,069
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +19,500
    Even though this man has come forward and told his story, and even if Syria ADMITS they have them, and even if Syria hands them over, and one of the larger chem projectiles gets shoved up teddy *hick* kennedy's ass, the dems and their partners in crime, the MSM, will NEVER admit they said anything wrong, or were wrong, about anything. To think different is futile.

    This man and his story is hush, hush in all forms of media except Fox News and the bloggisphere.
     
  2. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0


    Iraq Generals are now comming forward and are confirming that the WMD were sent to Syria with the aid of Russian Special ops(just prior to the invasion)...this was the intel of the day...another story will soon unfold as to what we do with Syria at this point and time! :ali: <<< not!
     
  3. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    The largest stockpile of WMDs in the world could turn up and it would not indicate incompetence to me. It's only lose/to you lefties. If they also turned around and said they said they were wrong just to try (in vain) to shut you lefties up, I'd buy that too since I already think it.
     
  4. Palestinian Jew
    Offline

    Palestinian Jew Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    903
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Fayetteville
    Ratings:
    +18
    1) This guy has a book to pitch
    2) What is his name? Could he even have access to that kind of info
    3) It is unbelievable(unless the admin is as incompetent as I think it is) that we did not have satellites over the areas where admin officials, such as Rumsfeld, "knew" that weapons existed. We should have been watching their convoy of vehicles, driving out of Iraq and into Syria.
    4) Syria is not that big of a country. "25,000 liters of anthrax...38,000 liters of botulinum toxin...500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent...several mobile biological weapons labs" is hard to hide. So why can't we find it???

    Really, this is just a convenient way to opt out of the reality that Chalabi duped Bush and friends. You might as well say that the weapons came to life and rode away on a unicorn. No one can disprove that either.
     
  5. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    Why is it hard to hide in a sandbox the size of Iraq?
     
  6. Palestinian Jew
    Offline

    Palestinian Jew Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    903
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Fayetteville
    Ratings:
    +18
    You realize I was talking about Syria, don't you? It's not part of America, so you might not know about it. To put it in perspective, it's just a little bigger than North Dakota and north of Jordan.
     
  7. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    :laugh:

    I've been to the ME a few times. But anyone who hasn't can still read a map. And anyone skilled in the art of camouflage could hide whatever they wanted in plain view.
     
  8. LuvRPgrl
    Offline

    LuvRPgrl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,163
    Thanks Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +206
    You should have heard this guy interviewed. I am pretty good at assesing people, and he sounded like the real deal to me. Prager doesnt interview loonies, unless they are liberals, (well, thats a given)

    They were moved BEFORE the ouster of saddam, so if they were moved, its more the fault of those who opposed going in and forced a delay. Personally I think Bush should have acted much, much sooner.

    The reason they are mute about it is because they dont want to make claims that cant or arent already confirmed. The liberals have already used this as an effective hammer (mainly because they didnt have much else, and NO alternate solution) but image the reprucussions if AGAIN Bush admin. made a claim of the existence of WMD's and it turned out there were none. DISASTER.

    Yea, many people think we had inadequate troops, many thought we didnt have enough, many thought we shouldnt use F-16's, others thought we should have used more, many think the portable toilets are the wrong size, etc, etc, ITS IRRELEVANT what many people thought.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. LuvRPgrl
    Offline

    LuvRPgrl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,163
    Thanks Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +206
    He is donating 100% of the profits. I dont remember his name, if I even caught it.

    He was the general of the Air Force, they flew them out.

    It isnt that hard to hide that stuff, the desert is BIG.

    unicorn? sounds more like a liberal concept to me
     
  10. Mariner
    Offline

    Mariner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    772
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Boston, Mass.
    Ratings:
    +52
    the interview, LuvRP. I don't watch much TV since I'm deaf and hate the captions (which contain a lot of errors). It would certainly be interesting if it's true that significant WMD's were moved to Iraq.

    GunnyL and Dillo, you are missing my point. Bush and his military planners disregarded the advice of many senior military people and former administration figures, including many Republicans such as Brent Scowcroft, in planning the invasion. If WMDs were moved and we missed them, then Bush and his buddies are going to look like idiots for letting them get away. Sure, it'll help justify the war, but then it'll look like he flubbed it. That's why I call it lose/lose, and why I think the White House hasn't said a word about occasional rumors such as those about Syria.

    Again, it's not just me saying so--it's the editorial page of the largest conservative newspaper, the Wall Street Journal. Disagree with the idea if you want, but don't say it's just Democrat-speak.

    I'm sorry I can't give you a link to the Journal's editorial. Unlike the more liberal New York Times, which gives away much of its content free on the web, the Journal requires a subscription. Darned conservatives.

    Mariner.
     

Share This Page