- Sep 9, 2022
- 12,434
- 5,593
- 938
So per you, you don't make claims such as what I was reading?They're the one making the claim, I'm the one asking for proof. I don't need to provide any links.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So per you, you don't make claims such as what I was reading?They're the one making the claim, I'm the one asking for proof. I don't need to provide any links.
So all you did was pick a fight. I see now how you plan to operate.Ok. So you have no proof anyone said any such thing and you basically made up some silly straw man argument that you could have a fake argue against. This is precisely why no one should ever take your anti science wackos seriously.
The sun's energy is simply too weak? The sun's energy is virtually all we have...all fossil fuels are essentially stored sunlight . The Earth would be a ball of ice without sunlight.Everyready and Duracell have been researching batteries for a century. Diehard has researched batteries for a century. Now we need more research?
The sun's energy is simply to weak. We need 1000's of square miles of solar panels, destroying farmland, forests, and pristine desert.
Solar consumes raw materials by the millions of tons. All processed by heavy industry. Thus solar is a new source of CO2 released into the atmosphere (which is food for life).
200,000 to 400,000 tons of CO2 everyday contributed by solar and wind.
The first solar cell was invented in 1883. The solar cell has been researched and developed longer than the invention of the computer.
We do not need short lived solar panels, we need electric power plants that last 50 to a 100 years, that is nuclear power. Speaking of which, a nuclear power plant is a battery, releasing it's power over a span of 30 years.
Actually when the sun starts dying into a red giant earth will have been long since vaporized .The sun's energy is simply too weak? The sun's energy is virtually all we have...all fossil fuels are essentially stored sunlight . The Earth would be a ball of ice without sunlight.
If the energy used to make PV is from renewable sources no CO2 is produced.
A nuclear power plant produces power for 30 years and extreme hazard for thousands of years. Can you say irresponsible?
Fossil Fuels were created over 4.5 billions of years. Now you make the claim that in minutes, a few hours of sunlight, we can replace what took billions of years?The sun's energy is simply too weak? The sun's energy is virtually all we have...all fossil fuels are essentially stored sunlight . The Earth would be a ball of ice without sunlight.
????If the energy used to make PV is from renewable sources no CO2 is produced.
30 years? Where have you been? We have Nuclear reactors today that are 50 years old and still operating. Nuclear reactors that were designed 70 years ago!!!!!!A nuclear power plant produces power for 30 years and extreme hazard for thousands of years. Can you say irresponsible?
It is not that the solar energy is weak, it isn't . The problem is the amount of energy we need to use to capture that energy producing solar cells and then storing that energy. The whole arrangement ( solar cells + hydro storage) means it has an over cost of 50% compared to nuclear energy.The sun's energy is simply too weak? The sun's energy is virtually all we have...all fossil fuels are essentially stored sunlight . The Earth would be a ball of ice without sunlight.
If the energy used to make PV is from renewable sources no CO2 is produced.
A nuclear power plant produces power for 30 years and extreme hazard for thousands of years. Can you say irresponsible?
I don't relate crude oil found deep in Earth to your version of sunlight. CO2 is fine. It has saved Earth in the past. It took Earth out of the Snowball age. CO2 can save Earth again from a death due to being a huge snowball.The sun's energy is simply too weak? The sun's energy is virtually all we have...all fossil fuels are essentially stored sunlight . The Earth would be a ball of ice without sunlight.
If the energy used to make PV is from renewable sources no CO2 is produced.
A nuclear power plant produces power for 30 years and extreme hazard for thousands of years. Can you say irresponsible?
No, the problem is that Solar energy is very weakIt is not that the solar energy is weak, it isn't .
Yet, solar cells have a cost that is over 10,000% higher!!!! And no matter how much you spend, they are still weak leaving us without the energy we need.This means solar cells produced with renewable energy would have a 50% higher cost. And that's the state of things until we improve the energy efficiency of solar cell production. I haven't seen the numbers for thin-film solar cells.
We could, but nobody wants to build them or live near them.brilliant, we could invent something old and call it new, like a nuclear power plant, that dont need batteries
Yes, easily. This is simple math.Fossil Fuels were created over 4.5 billions of years. Now you make the claim that in minutes, a few hours of sunlight, we can replace what took billions of years?
hhahahahahaha, show us the math, the process, start at bare land, digging the mine, etc., etc.Yes, easily. This is simple math.
yet, all across the world they are being builtWe could, but nobody wants to build them or live near them.
Simple. Calculate how much energy the sun imparts on a square meter per second. Compare it to combustion. Durely.ypu don't think you just stumped the worlslds scientists with an exercise that college freshmen do.hhahahahahaha, show us the math, the process, start at bare land, digging the mine, etc., etc.
I bet you can not name one chemical needed off the top of your head.
Not by private parties they aren't. Please stop making stuff up.yet, all across the world they are being built
You are right, John Doe next door is not building a nuclear plant. But that is not what you stated to begin this little tit for tat.Not by private parties they aren't. Please stop making stuff up.
Are you suggesting we nationalize nuclear power?
Yes, I am right again, there is no electricity being produced by solar panels tonight. Seems dumb to say, but look at what happens when we search that very idea.