NO comment from democrats



With 90% not showing for court, detention is warranted.

We have no obligation to educate or provide recreation for anyone in detention.

From your third link:

“We were representing a 3-year-old in court recently

So you lied about them being alone, they had an attorney, most likely paid for by the taxpayers.

.

And statements like that in regards to children, are exactly people with views like yours are accused of supporting child abuse. The Flores settlement is a legal settlement that requires the government to provide legal assistance and education to detained migrant children.

Here is a six year old, appearing without an attorney. Are you going to make some new excuses? A Defendant Shows Up in Immigration Court by Himself. He’s 6. — ProPublica


These are just kids you know. Not subhumans.


When you don't have the people to supervise, activities necessarily cease. Get over it. Flores was one of the the famous sue and settle scams the moabama admin pulled, it needs to be challenged, no time like the present.

And how on earth did a 6 year old find the courthouse in an unfamiliar city all by himself? BTW, your link says an attorney did represent him, they just didn't show up with him and they gave no disposition.

.

The Flores agreement was reached in 1997. Obama wasn’t in office then.

So you think it should be acceptable to abuse migrant children in detention? Seriously? Because by challenging the minimum humane standards it lays out it sure does sound like it.


I think the lies about abuse are just that. No one is being intentionally mistreated, in fact many at the CBP are coming out of their own pockets for diapers and toys. Most of those kids wouldn't know what to do with a toothbrush and toothpaste. Have you ever been to the interior of Honduras? Detention centers are a big step up.

.
 
>> A person just had a thread closed cause he did not post a link in it..... Guess what? His thread was about the FACT no one had said anything, perhaps a Mod can explain how one posts a link to NOTHING? <<

There is no requirement to have a link. Opinion or referencing a well known current event is enough.. As long as the OPoster sets up a topic properly with personal content.. If this happens, it's likely because there are multiple threads being merged with more info or better OPs and this one just got left out...

Further more a link WAS provided in the 2nd or 3rd post by another poster..

Don't reply in thread. If you want to discuss or provide the specifics of this "thread closure" -- contact me via email...
 
They aren’t the ones breaking the law. You are. And what is with asking for indefinite detention for kids and removing programs for education and recreation and legal help? That is you. Do you enjoy seeing a three old facing an immigration judge by herself?


:link::link::link::link::link:

.

To which part?

'Willful Recklessness': Trump Pushes for Indefinite Family Detention - Rewire.News

Trump administration nixes educational, recreational activities for migrant children in U.S. custody

Immigrant toddlers ordered to appear in court alone

You're defending the abuse of refugee families and children. You're denying that there are laws which were passed after WWII, when Jews fleeing the Nazis were sent back to Germany to be gassed in the ovens. The world said then that they would always take in refugees.

Today Trump cancelled the asylum laws by EO. It won't stand up in court, but as of today, you'll only be allowed to ask for asylum if you are fleeing Canada or Mexico. If you cross another country to come to the US, you have to claim asylum in a country you crossed.

I'm happy to see Trump finally admit outright that he's a racist. There is no defence today.

But you'll still defend Trump. At this point there is no defence against a man who is racist, bigotted and who doesn't serve the best interests of the American public.





With 90% not showing for court, detention is warranted.

We have no obligation to educate or provide recreation for anyone in detention.

From your third link:

“We were representing a 3-year-old in court recently

So you lied about them being alone, they had an attorney, most likely paid for by the taxpayers.

.

And statements like that in regards to children, are exactly people with views like yours are accused of supporting child abuse. The Flores settlement is a legal settlement that requires the government to provide legal assistance and education to detained migrant children.

Here is a six year old, appearing without an attorney. Are you going to make some new excuses? A Defendant Shows Up in Immigration Court by Himself. He’s 6. — ProPublica


These are just kids you know. Not subhumans.


When you don't have the people to supervise, activities necessarily cease. Get over it. Flores was one of the the famous sue and settle scams the moabama admin pulled, it needs to be challenged, no time like the present.

And how on earth did a 6 year old find the courthouse in an unfamiliar city all by himself? BTW, your link says an attorney did represent him, they just didn't show up with him and they gave no disposition.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top