New York Times doubles down on conspiracy to Murder Wilson (did not remove his address)

[NYcarbineer]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Oh, yeah, and the anti-abortion thing is about and action, a decision, an ideology and this Ferguson thing is just skin color.

 

[FA_Q2]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

It would depend on the situation but in general, it would be similar. If a news source were to report on a 'horrible' abortion clinic and then give out the address of someone working there then they would essentially be doing the same thing that the times did here.

This case is more pronounced considering the violence surrounding it right now though. I really have no doubt that this will cause some harm to the officer and his family.

 

[NYcarbineer]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, btw, Foxnews publicized the name of the suburb Wilson lives in, and that he lived in a brick house, as I posted yesterday,

back in August.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

Who are doing something that's perfectly legal. So much for Law and Order.

 

[jknowgood]

The New York Times is making their stance clear: Murder Wilson

They published his address (which was approved by an editor) and after being exposed for it, they double downed and retained his address.

The editor should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder there is no other reason for the address to have been published. I am sure the fact that the editor was black had nothing to do with it.

As Mediaite columnist Joe Concha puts it, “Regardless of your thoughts on Wilson’s guilt or innocence, how can anyone believe providing his street and name of his wife be anything but irresponsible?”

The Times has published a correction -- but not the kind you would expect:

“An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed.”

Reckless move The NY Times publishes Darren Wilson s address Fox News

You're a nut case OP.

Just in case Wilson gets murdered:

Bosman’s address (editor/author)

5620 N WAYNE AVE APT 2
CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204
COOK COUNTY

Robertson (editor/author)

1113 N DUPRE ST
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203
ORLEANS COUNTY

Obviously their addresses are already public knowledge if you were able to easily find them on the internet. So, you are encouraging vigilantism and murder. Interesting. What a nice guy. Oh wait; you are indeed a nut case, like I already said.

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

Yeah, I think 2 abortion doctors have been killed since abortion became legal. How many millions of babies have they murdered?

 

[J.E.D]

The New York Times is making their stance clear: Murder Wilson

They published his address (which was approved by an editor) and after being exposed for it, they double downed and retained his address.

The editor should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder there is no other reason for the address to have been published. I am sure the fact that the editor was black had nothing to do with it.

As Mediaite columnist Joe Concha puts it, “Regardless of your thoughts on Wilson’s guilt or innocence, how can anyone believe providing his street and name of his wife be anything but irresponsible?”

The Times has published a correction -- but not the kind you would expect:

“An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed.”

Reckless move The NY Times publishes Darren Wilson s address Fox News

You're a nut case OP.

Just in case Wilson gets murdered:

Bosman’s address (editor/author)

5620 N WAYNE AVE APT 2
CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204
COOK COUNTY

Robertson (editor/author)

1113 N DUPRE ST
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203
ORLEANS COUNTY

Obviously their addresses are already public knowledge if you were able to easily find them on the internet. So, you are encouraging vigilantism and murder. Interesting. What a nice guy. Oh wait; you are indeed a nut case, like I already said.

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

Yeah, I think 2 abortion doctors have been killed since abortion became legal. How many millions of babies have they murdered?

Abortion is legal. Nitwit.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Abortion is legal. Nitwit.

So was slavery at one time.

 

[jknowgood]

The New York Times is making their stance clear: Murder Wilson

They published his address (which was approved by an editor) and after being exposed for it, they double downed and retained his address.

The editor should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder there is no other reason for the address to have been published. I am sure the fact that the editor was black had nothing to do with it.

Reckless move The NY Times publishes Darren Wilson s address Fox News

You're a nut case OP.

Just in case Wilson gets murdered:

Bosman’s address (editor/author)

5620 N WAYNE AVE APT 2
CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204
COOK COUNTY

Robertson (editor/author)

1113 N DUPRE ST
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203
ORLEANS COUNTY

Obviously their addresses are already public knowledge if you were able to easily find them on the internet. So, you are encouraging vigilantism and murder. Interesting. What a nice guy. Oh wait; you are indeed a nut case, like I already said.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

Yeah, I think 2 abortion doctors have been killed since abortion became legal. How many millions of babies have they murdered?

Abortion is legal. Nitwit.

Just because a judge made it legal, doesn't make murdering a baby okay.

 

[Rozman]

I guess the NY Times has taken it upon themselves to get "justice" for Michael Brown.... that can be the only explanation for this.
There should be outrage for what they did.
And the left swears there isn't Liberal bias in the media.

 

[Conservative65]

His address was no secret.

Unless you're willing to say everyone knew it, it was.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

His address was no secret.

I fail to see any purpose whatsoever outside of bringing hardship to him in printing his address. None whatsoever. That makes the move by the NY Times amazingly ugly. It is pathetic and should not be accepted from media sources.

Would you say this is worse, not as bad, or the same as the publication of the addresses of abortion doctors?

Comparable but not as bad because we don't see so many anti-abortionists rioting, looting and burning down buildings. The anti-abortion people are more specific.

Yes they just kill the doctors.

Who are doing something that's perfectly legal. So much for Law and Order.

No one is justifying that. Just trying to add some reasoned perspective to the bad comparison.

 

[NYcarbineer]

His address was no secret.

Unless you're willing to say everyone knew it, it was.

My address is no secret to anyone knowing my name, but not everyone knows my address.

 

[FA_Q2]

His address was no secret.

Unless you're willing to say everyone knew it, it was.

My address is no secret to anyone knowing my name, but not everyone knows my address.

And is still nothing more than a deflection from the point. Nice try though.

 

[tinydancer]

I think publishing the names and addresses of editors and their childrens addresses might be a lesson for those at the NYT's.

I've been a busy little soul.

I expanded the base from the NYT's. I have everyone across board from Daily Kos to NYT to the WP's.

I love this stuff that you can do on the net. Albeit I am stuck with primitive.

 

[tinydancer]

You aren't Arianna baby.

His address was no secret.

Unless you're willing to say everyone knew it, it was.

My address is no secret to anyone knowing my name, but not everyone knows my address.

 

[tinydancer]

I guess no one has twigged on my sig line yet. *sigh* silly liberals.

 

[Oldstyle]

Does it really surprise anyone that the New York Times did this? A once proud icon of journalism has become the poster child for biased reporting. It's sad...