NEW YORK TIMES already printed a RETRACTION of an editorial blaming SARAH PALIN for the shooting.

[ColonelAngus]

The NYT has had to print 2 retractions in a week because THEY FUCKING LIE.

They cowered like the COWARDS they are because Palin threatened to SUE FOR LIBEL BECAUSE OF THE LIES.

NYT issues correction to Giffords editorial

Seriously....FUCK THE NEW YORK TIMES.

 

[WillowTree]

Yes! And, you still have non thinking fuctards on here repeating those lies!

 

[Dschrute3]

Too little, too late. The NY Times is one of the most important media tools used by the Left/Democrats to radicalize their supporters. The Palin story was already out there. You can't undo it. And the Times knows that very well. The damage is done. Just more hate incitement.

 

[ColonelAngus]

What's funny is how butthurt snowflakes WHINE when someone brings up HILLARY CLINTON...saying that she is old news and conservatives are obsessed with HILLARY.

THEN THE SNOWFLAKE BIBLE, THE NEW YORK TIMES, LIBELS SARAH FUCKING PALIN.

Mention Hillary Clinton 7 months after her election = BAD!
Mention Sarah Palin 103 months after her election = GOOD!

Snowflake logic.

Don't question the SNOWFLAKE SHARIA LAW. AGREE OR BE PERSONALLY ATTACKED!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Carlos Slim's newspaper is total crap.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

More!

Fake News NYT Sneaks Correction Into Sarah Palin Smear Article With ZERO Editor’s Note

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/fake-news-nyt-sneaks-correction-sarah-palin-smear-article-zero-editors-note/

 

[ColonelAngus]

Yes! And, you still have non thinking fuctards on here repeating those lies!

The liberal NARRATIVE that SARAH PALIN caused the guy to shoot GABBY GIFFORDS is a STRAIGHT UP LIE.

The SHOOTER HAD NEVER SEEN THE SARAH PALIN AD THAT SNOWFLAKES CLAIM DROVE HIM.

That doesn't matter, though. it's all about destroying your political opponents, because if they oppose your beliefs, they are BAD PEOPLE.

The SNOWFLAKE RELIGION. Truth is not a thing, only destroying your opponenents by lying.

The PROOF OF THIS BULLSHIT STORY IS THE RETRACTION BY THE NEW YORK TIMES.





TO SUMMARIZE:

The NEW YORK TIMES lied that Sarah Palin caused Gabby GIFFORD's shooting.....as well as yesterday's.

Palin threatened to SUE FOR LIBEL.

THE NEW YORK TIMES ISSUED A RETRACTION OF THEIR LIES BECAUSE THEY ARE LYING COWARD *****.

 

[easyt65]

Amazing how fast being threatened with a massive law suit for your blatantly politically biased lies will get a retraction.

Still despicable. The NYT is 'fish wrap'.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Of course the attack has to be the fault of a conservative. The absolute arrogance of some is appalling. There is a member of government fighting for his life, attacked not just by a Sanders supporter, but a volunteer for his campaign! A socialist who embraces policies which are inherently anti-American are going to attract certain people.

Here is the scary part in my estimation, just by watching the reactions at Universities and from celebrities and the alt-left in general, what this guy did was act out what has been verbally expressed and it will continue since these comedians, media networks and alt-left members have passively given them permission, they have normalized verbalizing violence, it's just the next step for nutjobs to embrace and act out these words. This is particularly true when the drones are told everyday that the President is illegitimate, "Russia Russia, Russia, collusion, collusion, collusion" And now, "obstruction, obstruction". Everyone knows that it's dangerous, even many on the left have spoken out about the suppression of opinion and the violence being expressed by some. They can see it for themselves.

Didn't the New York Times say after the election results that they were going to be an honest reporting source from that day forward? They were so biased and outright wrong on their understanding of America and Americans in the election that their arrogance clouded their reporting. Seems they still can't get over their own ideology....

From the horses mouth:

To Our Readers, From the Publisher and Executive Editor
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/...-the-publisher-and-executive-editor.html?_r=0

As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Yes! And, you still have non thinking fuctards on here repeating those lies!

And that is the rub. It doesn't have to be true. It just has to be believed. Apparently, there are no consequences, so why would they stop? Propaganda is productive. All you need for it to be successful is stupid people regurgitating the lies to more stupid people. So the next time someone quotes the Times, or WAPO, just shake your head sadly and give them one of these, . They have a case of the stupids...

 

[blackhawk]

Same shit different day.

 

[usmbguest5318]

NEW YORK TIMES [NYT] already printed a RETRACTION of an editorial blaming SARAH PALIN for the shooting.

Okaaaay.....aannnd.....People and organizations, all of them, make mistakes. People and organizations of integrity "own" their mistakes. The Times did. They wrote:

“An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established."​

What problem do you have with the NYT calling attention to an errant assertion they published? Would you rather they maintain an intransigent stance?

 

[basquebromance]

Palin is gonna sue the Times. go get em Sarah!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

If I were Sarah I would have told them I want A Front Page Retraction in Bold Headlines or I'm gonna sue the shit outta ya!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Keep in mind, Snowflakes consider the New York Times a "reliable source".

Their "reliable source" was busted lying twice in a week.