New York hospital shooter used New York legal, AR-15, 10 round magazines..

[2aguy]

this is why's the anti gunners will never allow Americans to have any size magazines.....they say they just want any magazine that holds more than 10 round magazines, and then they will be happy....

They are lying......this Dr. shooter used 10 round magazines to shoot these people from a New York compliant AR-15 rifle.......

So, no...they will not stop at 10 round magazines, they will not stop at rifles that hold those magazines..this shooter could have used a lever action rifle or a revolver to do his shooting......


Magazine limits did not save lives here......rifle bans did not save lives here....there isn't no reason to ban either item...except for an irrational, nonsensical fear of guns.....

Amd....it was a gun free zone......only the shooter was allowed to have a gun.

Remember the other hospital where the Dr. broke the rules and brought his own gun, illegally into his gun free hospital...and used it to stop another masss shooter....stopping the killing long before the police arrived...

BREAKING: NY Hospital Shooter Used NY Legal AR-15 - The Truth About Guns

MSNBC is reporting that the shooting at the NY hospital this afternoon used an AR-15 that had been “modified” such that it didn’t have a pistol grip and used a magazinewith only 10 round capacity. Those changes mean only one thing: the rifle was legal under the NY SAFE Act, the assault weapon ban, and legal in New York.

The city of New York (where the shooting took place) has additional restrictions on firearms, including licensing for rifles and shotguns within city limits.

The fact that a properly modified and neutered AR-15 was used in a “mass shooting” event such as this will no doubt raise questions. For those in the pro-gun camp the typical response will probably be to claim that this is proof that things like the NY SAFE act doesn’t work, and “assault weapons” bans are meaningless attempts to make gunslook less scary without actually making them less deadly. Those in the anti-gun camp will no doubt claim that this is proof that the NY SAFE Act and assault weapons ban aren’t strong enough, and need additional regulations to promote safety.

New York hospital shooter used New York legal, AR-15,

you see that is what the freedom hating leftists wanted

this way you can see they can say "see we have not gone far enough in banning guns"

Gun grabbers are engaging in Trench Warfare....each day they advance an inch at a time... today, a magazine ban, tomorrow a certain type of rifle ban....and on and on.....

 

[jon_berzerk]

this is why's the anti gunners will never allow Americans to have any size magazines.....they say they just want any magazine that holds more than 10 round magazines, and then they will be happy....

They are lying......this Dr. shooter used 10 round magazines to shoot these people from a New York compliant AR-15 rifle.......

So, no...they will not stop at 10 round magazines, they will not stop at rifles that hold those magazines..this shooter could have used a lever action rifle or a revolver to do his shooting......


Magazine limits did not save lives here......rifle bans did not save lives here....there isn't no reason to ban either item...except for an irrational, nonsensical fear of guns.....

Amd....it was a gun free zone......only the shooter was allowed to have a gun.

Remember the other hospital where the Dr. broke the rules and brought his own gun, illegally into his gun free hospital...and used it to stop another masss shooter....stopping the killing long before the police arrived...

BREAKING: NY Hospital Shooter Used NY Legal AR-15 - The Truth About Guns

MSNBC is reporting that the shooting at the NY hospital this afternoon used an AR-15 that had been “modified” such that it didn’t have a pistol grip and used a magazinewith only 10 round capacity. Those changes mean only one thing: the rifle was legal under the NY SAFE Act, the assault weapon ban, and legal in New York.

The city of New York (where the shooting took place) has additional restrictions on firearms, including licensing for rifles and shotguns within city limits.

The fact that a properly modified and neutered AR-15 was used in a “mass shooting” event such as this will no doubt raise questions. For those in the pro-gun camp the typical response will probably be to claim that this is proof that things like the NY SAFE act doesn’t work, and “assault weapons” bans are meaningless attempts to make gunslook less scary without actually making them less deadly. Those in the anti-gun camp will no doubt claim that this is proof that the NY SAFE Act and assault weapons ban aren’t strong enough, and need additional regulations to promote safety.

New York hospital shooter used New York legal, AR-15,

you see that is what the freedom hating leftists wanted

this way you can see they can say "see we have not gone far enough in banning guns"

Gun grabbers are engaging in Trench Warfare....each day they advance an inch at a time... today, a magazine ban, tomorrow a certain type of rifle ban....and on and on.....

yes that is how they planned it from the beginning

most people are waking up to this though

and see through their BS

 

[skookerasbil]

2aGuy......love the passion bro but lets face it.......gun grabber threads have become so boring in 2017. I rarely even bother to get involved because nobody cares anymore...............

In U.S., Support for Assault Weapons Ban at Record Low

and that's from last year..........

Even in 2011, a huge portion of the country wanted no restrictions on guns........

Record-Low 26% in U.S. Favor Handgun Ban

The gun grabber nutters are irrelevant in American politics............

 

[Nosmo King]

Under our system of jurisprudence, allegations do not equal a conviction. Moron.

Correct, and he won't be convicted of murder either. Feel better?

And yet his previous disgressions did not prevent him from getting his gun.

Yes....that damned due process thing you left wingers hate so much......imagine a world where you could just lock people up because you don't like them....that would just tickle you to death, no doubt.....

Perhaps, in this and many other cases, a thorough background check could have prevented his getting the weapon.

Nope.....he didn't have a criminal record....so he would have passed a current federally mandated background check and a private sale background check....

Therefore he was indeed a law abiding citizen until he pulled that trigger.

 

[2aguy]

2aGuy......love the passion bro but lets face it.......gun grabber threads have become so boring in 2017. I rarely even bother to get involved because nobody cares anymore...............

In U.S., Support for Assault Weapons Ban at Record Low

And that is why I keep posting.....it doesn't matter what we think...the 4th Circuit Court of appeals just gutted the 2nd Amendment and people don't know about it.....the democrats/gun grabbers realized that gun control loses seats in congress....so obama and hilary knew the courts are the way to get guns...and obama packed the lower courts with gun grabbers...in particular the 4th circuit....with one ruling local mayors and governors can strip guns from citizens....because of the 4th Circuit court ruling and people don't even know it happened.....

 

[2aguy]

Correct, and he won't be convicted of murder either. Feel better?

And yet his previous disgressions did not prevent him from getting his gun.

Yes....that damned due process thing you left wingers hate so much......imagine a world where you could just lock people up because you don't like them....that would just tickle you to death, no doubt.....

Perhaps, in this and many other cases, a thorough background check could have prevented his getting the weapon.

Nope.....he didn't have a criminal record....so he would have passed a current federally mandated background check and a private sale background check....

Therefore he was indeed a law abiding citizen until he pulled that trigger.

No...the moment he planned the murder and moved to commit the murder he was no longer a law abiding individual.

 

[there4eyeM]

[/QUOTE]
Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.[/QUOTE]

Original.

 

[Divine Wind]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Original.

No, but still true. The anti-gun mob is like any other mob; it's mindless. They see the gun ban as a cure-all but not the reason for the gun -- which is to save lives. Well, if the goal is to save lives, let's focus on saving lives. If the purpose is to ban guns then focus on banning guns. Which is the goal of the Left Wing? Not to save lives, but to ban guns. Why?

 

[Divine Wind]

Correct, and he won't be convicted of murder either. Feel better?

And yet his previous disgressions did not prevent him from getting his gun.

Yes....that damned due process thing you left wingers hate so much......imagine a world where you could just lock people up because you don't like them....that would just tickle you to death, no doubt.....

Perhaps, in this and many other cases, a thorough background check could have prevented his getting the weapon.

Nope.....he didn't have a criminal record....so he would have passed a current federally mandated background check and a private sale background check....

Therefore he was indeed a law abiding citizen until he pulled that trigger.

Not true. He was never convicted of anything, but the odds are, if he was indeed a sexual harasser, he wasn't law-abiding. I also think he had a screw loose and needed mental health care. As the investigation plays out, I'm guessing, like other nutjobs, we'll find that he had relatives and friends who knew he needed help but he wouldn't get it.

 

[2aguy]

And yet his previous disgressions did not prevent him from getting his gun.

Yes....that damned due process thing you left wingers hate so much......imagine a world where you could just lock people up because you don't like them....that would just tickle you to death, no doubt.....

Perhaps, in this and many other cases, a thorough background check could have prevented his getting the weapon.

Nope.....he didn't have a criminal record....so he would have passed a current federally mandated background check and a private sale background check....

Therefore he was indeed a law abiding citizen until he pulled that trigger.

Not true. He was never convicted of anything, but the odds are, if he was indeed a sexual harasser, he wasn't law-abiding. I also think he had a screw loose and needed mental health care. As the investigation plays out, I'm guessing, like other nutjobs, we'll find that he had relatives and friends who knew he needed help but he wouldn't get it.

From the story I linked to earlier.....witnesses from the Hosptital stated the guy said at the time he resigned he was going to come back and shoot people.........

 

[jon_berzerk]

Correct, and he won't be convicted of murder either. Feel better?

And yet his previous disgressions did not prevent him from getting his gun.

Yes....that damned due process thing you left wingers hate so much......imagine a world where you could just lock people up because you don't like them....that would just tickle you to death, no doubt.....

Perhaps, in this and many other cases, a thorough background check could have prevented his getting the weapon.

Nope.....he didn't have a criminal record....so he would have passed a current federally mandated background check and a private sale background check....

Therefore he was indeed a law abiding citizen until he pulled that trigger.

was he after taking the firearm into a gun free zone

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Yeah. The pro gun people remind me of the people that defend illegal aliens. That's right, this weird logic of theirs. We need them, why? It's what America is about? There is a parallel here. We don't NEED either and both are harmful, and yet certain groups put on the blinkers and use patriotism and use money and political maneuvering to further their cause despite the harm they do, PACs are powerful things.

Which amendment is the "illegal alien" one?

Common here, people fineness laws to support illegal or guns, illegal alien is pejorative, we aren't supposed to say that because of liberal group think. And Conservative group think would excuse mas shootings, illegal possession of firearms, Sandy Hook and live in a deluded group think world like liberals.

I readily agree there are lying pieces of shit partisan fuckwards on both sides of the political divide. Still, self-defense is a fundamental right and enumerated in our Constitution. While I fully support immigration reform, I do not condone encouraging criminals to break the law.

If this society didn't have guns, if they were banned, would we NEED them so much? We needed guns back in 1776 for sustenance, or to fight British overlords and their minions. We have supermarkets and F 22 raptors now, why do we need guns? It's a silly self sustaining argument. We NEED guns to protect us from people with guns?

Beautifully said.

You gotta wonder if these deep intellects that conclude the answer to violence is more violence must have been dropped on their heads at some point. SMH

Well except for the whole fact that since 1993 we have proven more firearms means tons of less crime.