New Video Emerges Of Gaddafi Being Sodomized While Alive During Capture

[Synthaholic]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

 

[Lakhota]

I heard the real Gaddafi is still alive, and that it was just one of his doubles the rebels killed.

 

[Synthaholic]

I didn't read the whole thread. Did we find out if it was just another faked Breitbart video yet? I don't think he's ever had one that's not edited to make something out of nothing.

Well that's your story anyway and you're sticking with it. Yea sure,all his videos are fakes. Who told you that? Pretty convenient way to ignore reality no? Just claim all his videos are fake and be done with it. Not very logical. But that's just my observation anyway.

Hey retread - What was your previous username on this site?

 

[Synthaholic]

You DOPE,EVER HEARD OF RENDITION you know where the AMERICANS/BUSH THE ILLERATE allowed TORTURE and EXECUTION ........ so YAY GREAT AMERICA,MY ASS,YOU HYPOCRITE

You think obama has stopped the torture an exection? Hell he assingnated an American citizen.

You agreed to leave, and have not done so yet, so you're even a failure at following your own challenge rules!

Is Big Rebecca being a bitch again?

 

[Bill O'Olberman]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

A big difference between Iraq/Libya is that Libya was for the most part an internal revolution led by Libyan people with limited support from NATO (a Libyan solution for Libya). Iraq was an external occupation led by the US (hundreds of thousands of troops involved, thousands of US men and women killed, costing hundreds of billions) not the Iraqi people. Of course, I believe the end result is probably going to be the same for both: a clusterfuck.

And no, the Iraq War cheerleaders had no real/credible "bit of an argument" to justify the Iraq War.

 

[Tank]

I heard the real Gaddafi is still alive, and that it was just one of his doubles the rebels killed.

Was that Gaddafi's ass in the video?

 

[Lakhota]

I heard the real Gaddafi is still alive, and that it was just one of his doubles the rebels killed.

Was that Gaddafi's ass in the video?

No!

 

[Tank]

I heard the real Gaddafi is still alive, and that it was just one of his doubles the rebels killed.

Was that Gaddafi's ass in the video?

No!

 

[Ravi]

You DOPE,EVER HEARD OF RENDITION you know where the AMERICANS/BUSH THE ILLERATE allowed TORTURE and EXECUTION ........ so YAY GREAT AMERICA,MY ASS,YOU HYPOCRITE

You think obama has stopped the torture an exection? Hell he assingnated an American citizen.

You agreed to leave, and have not done so yet, so you're even a failure at following your own challenge rules!

He did? Link, please.

 

[Neotrotsky]

A new video has surfaced clearly showing a rebel sodomizing Gaddafi as he is taken from the storm drain clearly alive. It seems that the international community is outraged now because of the way Gaddafi was treated during his capture while alive and this new video will just add fuel to the fire. It was clearly a set up execution after he was caught riding in a convoy in broad daylight under a white flag on his way to surrender.



Gaddafi sodomized: Video shows abuse frame by frame

Friends of Obama

Maybe they were motivated by Obama's new policy on gays in the military

 

[High_Gravity]

Putting a stick up a guys ass has been a Muslim tradition for thousands of years.

LMAO!

 

[paulitician]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

 

[bodecea]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

?????

Muammar Gaddafi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Especially the section "Elimination of Dissent"

 

[High_Gravity]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

I wouldn't go that far, Gaddafi has killed his own people in the past hell he started doing it again when the protests started out peacefully.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Thank goodness
they did not water board him

 

[konradv]

Gaddaffi bad,Hussein good. Oh the poor chickenhawks are so lost. And i mean the chickenhawks in both parties. Gaddafi was not a threat to anyone,let alone the U.S. At least the Iraq War cheerleaders had a bit of an argument for getting rid of Hussein. It wasn't a strong argument but it was more credible. Hussein committed genocide against his own people and invaded nations in the region. And the President did go to Congress for approval. This Libyan War makes no sense. It was an illegal war for sure. I'm not celebrating.

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

The only thing that's failed is your reasoning. I believe we should help those that are helping themselves, like the Libyans and unlike the Iraqis. Funny you should throw "lives" in there!!! How many did we lose, anyway?!?! The money angle is just a joke!

 

[koshergrl]

Thank goodness
they did not water board him

Whew. They really ARE more civilized than we are. We should be MORE like them and this is proof positive...

 

[paulitician]

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

?????

Muammar Gaddafi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Especially the section "Elimination of Dissent"

There is no credible evidence that Gaddafi committed genocidal crimes. However that was fact with Hussein in Iraq. Also,Gaddafi got along very well with his neighbors. That obviously wasn't the case with Hussein. It was their Civil War and with all the problems we have here,we should have stayed out. But it wasn't about that anyway. It was all about the Oil in the end. People are just deluding themselves if they think differently. It wasn't about the "Poor Children" or "Democracy."

 

[paulitician]

Dumbass.


[FONT=&quot]“It is worth remembering, especially for the critics of this intervention, exactly what we would be facing in Libya now had we not taken action. Just over one week ago, Qaddafi was bearing down on Benghazi, a city of 700,000 people and the main seat of the Libyan opposition, as well as the provisional government that has now emerged. Qaddafi pledged ‘no mercy’ for these people. He pledged to go house to house to crush everyone opposed to him. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Had we not taken action in Libya, Benghazi would now be remembered in the same breath as Srebrenica – a scene of mass slaughter and a source of international shame. Libyan refugees would now be streaming into Egypt and Tunisia, destabilizing those critical countries during their already daunting political transitions. If we had allowed Qaddafi to slaughter Arabs and Muslims in Benghazi who were pleading for the U.S. military to rescue them, America’s moral standing in the broader Middle East would have been devastated. Al-Qaeda and other violent extremists would have exploited the resulting chaos and hopelessness. The forces of counterrevolution in the region would have gotten the message that the world would tolerate the violent oppression of peaceful demonstrations for universal rights. This would have been a dramatic setback for the ‘Arab Spring,’ which represents the most consequential geopolitical opportunity in decades. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
“This is why Libya matters, and why we were right to intervene.[/FONT]


http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=030beaf4-ce31-35db-22f0-2f426b6d7d5a

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

The only thing that's failed is your reasoning. I believe we should help those that are helping themselves, like the Libyans and unlike the Iraqis. Funny you should throw "lives" in there!!! How many did we lose, anyway?!?! The money angle is just a joke!

Unfortunately it's not funny. Like i said,it's always about the 'D' & 'R' thing for so many. Gaddafi bad,Hussein good. Yada Yada Yada.

 

[High_Gravity]

Wild speculation. Gaddafi had no history of killing his own people and he had very good relationships with his neighbors in the region. Also,Saddam Hussein actually did all the things you claimed Gaddafi was about to do. Yet most Left/Democrats wanted Bush's head over that war. So the Iraq War cheerleaders at least had a bit of an argument for getting rid of him. And Bush did go to Congress for approval and he got it. Starting wars because of things you think will happen in the future is just wrong. This Libyan War was illegal. We had no business getting involved with their Civil War. We have enough problems right here at home. We can't afford to spend more money & lives on interventions that are none of our business. It's time to change our failed foreign policy.

?????

Muammar Gaddafi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Especially the section "Elimination of Dissent"

There is no credible evidence that Gaddafi committed genocidal crimes. However that was fact with Hussein in Iraq. Also,Gaddafi got along very well with his neighbors. That obviously wasn't the case with Hussein. It was their Civil War and with all the problems we have here,we should have stayed out. But it wasn't about that anyway. It was all about the Oil in the end. People are just deluding themselves if they think differently. It wasn't about the "Poor Children" or "Democracy."

I wouldn't go that far, Libya invaded Chad under his watch and fought a border war with Egypt.

Libya Invades Chad 1981

Libyan