Listening
Gold Member
- Aug 27, 2011
- 14,989
- 1,650
- 260
One is required to provide EVIDENCE of claims the SCOTUS has made decisions not based on facts and the intent of the Constitution.
I know that the supposed right of privacy that suddenly existed for Roe Vs Wade was rather convenient.
I know that the supposed right of privacy that suddenly existed for Roe Vs Wade was rather convenient.
That was not an act of "Congress".
First of all, the "right of privacy" did not originate in Roe v Wade. That right was found to exist as a natural sequellae of the rights granted in the bill of rights. it recognized there were certain things in which government had no right to involve itself. You might want to first look at Griswold v Connecticut and Loving v Virginia. Perhaps you'll understand.
Why would it be an "act of congress"?
Yes, Bork talks about how Griswold and Loving were both terrible decisions.
The left loves them because they do what is "right" regardless of whether or not it is constitional.