SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
Neither. You should have trust in scientists and settle on the evidence.Should I have more faith in a renown, celebrated, peer reviewed Professor of Physics or USMB Crick who recently learned how to tie his own shoes....hmmm..
You denier has zero credibility, as she has no evidence amd isn't producing any. And her fist sentence is a lie.
People who what science? What evidence. I keep asking for just a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and none of you "trusters in science" seem to be able to provide it...not one single piece. When science can provide good observed, measured evidence to support its claims, then I will start trusting...
If you can't differentiate between science and pseudoscience, then placing trust in what you believe to be science is just stupid....But then, you would have to be something better than stupid in order to recognize the difference between science and pseudoscience wouldn't you?