Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ?video? explanation | Fox NewsNewly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated
Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
It doesn't. This dog never would hunt for you guys, and it still won't.Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
At this point what difference does it make?
It doesn't. This dog never would hunt for you guys, and it still won't.Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
At this point what difference does it make?
Stevens made his bed, it was his call, he chose to be there that day, and now he lies in it. Let's mush on.
Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
At this point what difference does it make?
Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
At this point what difference does it make?
None. Its a shame that the Benghazi "scandal" has been reduced to changing of talking points but you gotta have something. To walk away empty handed would suck
Stevens and his team chose to go there. They decided they were safe enough. No one died at the official Embassy that day, which was 400 miles away and protected. I know the facts are inconvenient to you but those are the facts.It doesn't. This dog never would hunt for you guys, and it still won't.At this point what difference does it make?
Stevens made his bed, it was his call, he chose to be there that day, and now he lies in it. Let's mush on.
Wow, yeah who cares about some dead American employees? So what if they were sacrificed to the Obama campaign?
You really are a shithead loser.
A rant is the exact word. That's all they have.I can't wait until 2016 so that the cons will finally stop ranting about benghazi
Stevens and his team chose to go there. They decided they were safe enough. No one died at the official Embassy that day, which was 400 miles away and protected. I know the facts are inconvenient to you but those are the facts.It doesn't. This dog never would hunt for you guys, and it still won't.
Stevens made his bed, it was his call, he chose to be there that day, and now he lies in it. Let's mush on.
Wow, yeah who cares about some dead American employees? So what if they were sacrificed to the Obama campaign?
You really are a shithead loser.
A rant is the exact word. That's all they have.I can't wait until 2016 so that the cons will finally stop ranting about benghazi
It doesn't bother me because that's not what happened. You simply believe that it did, when it didn't.Stevens and his team chose to go there. They decided they were safe enough. No one died at the official Embassy that day, which was 400 miles away and protected. I know the facts are inconvenient to you but those are the facts.Wow, yeah who cares about some dead American employees? So what if they were sacrificed to the Obama campaign?
You really are a shithead loser.
American employees died begging for help from their government, which wished them away in a campaign of lies and betrayed them.
And this doesnt bother you in the least.
And the tools come rushing in.
FOX NEWS.Well, well, well. What do we have here? It appears that the narrative of Benghazi being a "spontaneous protest brought on by a video" was the work of none other than White House officials.
Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ?video? explanation | Fox NewsNewly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated
Well, well, well. What do we have here? It appears that the narrative of Benghazi being a "spontaneous protest brought on by a video" was the work of none other than White House officials.
Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ?video? explanation | Fox NewsNewly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated
