New articles rotation

rtwngAvngr

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2004
15,755
512
48
With the loss of kathianne it seems we have an irregular workflow regarding new article postings. Days of scarcity are interspersed with heroic efforts ( thanks-nato ). Maybe we should set a schedule and 7 of us should take a day where we are responsible for posting at least 5 or so new articles.

I'll take a day. whichever day sir evil says.

Anyone else have a thought on this?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Also, can we get kathianne back? What did we do? Can we fix it?
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Also, can we get kathianne back? What did we do? Can we fix it?
seems like a lot of new stuff is posted but not much feedback occurs on most of them--post election relaxation maybe--I don't know why Kathianne left other than she was angry about something
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
I know she didn't like me arguing with isaac brock, but I'm sorry, he's a socialist.

Please come back Kathianne!!
 
rtwngAvngr said:
I know she didn't like me arguing with isaac brock, but I'm sorry, he's a socialist.

Please come back Kathianne!!
well I 'll do my best to try to throw out some fresh meat here too--then it'll just be up to others to grab it and run. :salute:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
dilloduck said:
well I 'll do my best to try to throw out some fresh meat here too--then it'll just be up to others to grab it and run. :salute:

I'm gonna try too.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
-=d=- said:
as in how?

I'm commenting about seeing every headline on drudge posted here. Overkill, imo.

Let's not denigrate the efforts of others, how about that, spanky?
 
-=d=- said:
Let's not get patronizing; how about that, Cupcake?


Denigrate efforts? Wha? If the intention of the site is to be a mirror for Drudge, fine. If not, how about a name change? Or perhaps develop a news interface like other sites have?


But sweetums...

the latter sounds like a good project for you, get on it, chief.
 
OCA said:
Kathianne was a wingnut who was on here 24-7-365 posting the same thing over and over. Actually there are a lot less useless threads to wade through since she left.

Hmm. I didn't see it that way at all.
 
OCA said:
Kathianne was a wingnut who was on here 24-7-365 posting the same thing over and over. Actually there are a lot less useless threads to wade through since she left.

Kathianne did spend a good bit of time on the board, but she researched and presented lots of interesting pieces.

BTW - when was the last time you posted some newsworthy items?
 
Sorry D and OCA, I'm back. I'll be posting a bit.

BTW D, don't think I linked to drudge much. You must have mistaken those with someone else.

OCA, definately looking for you to have more free time to post more on topic stuff, instead of tearing off on others.

Glad to be back, love you guys.
 
OCA said:
I do and have done both with great skill, don't try and muddy the waters with fallacies.

The venomous bashing of gays is hardly a contribution, monkey sack.
 
Boy, the hostilities in this thread.. Haven't y'all heard the phrase "It takes all kinds"? It wasn't initially meant with the sarcasm it's used with today...

Smile & play nice.
 
OCA said:
Oh and I guess the right of Pat Buchannan unable to see any other point of view on any topic is contributing?. :piss2:

Have any trouble with women lately? :cof:

Don't fuck with me, I know all.

It's been a while since we threw down, hasn't it, Esther? Ahhh the good old days!
 
there went a perfectly good thread about getting more news articles downgraded to homo name calling! why am i always late for these things?
 
Johnney said:
there went a perfectly good thread about getting more news articles downgraded to homo name calling! why am i always late for these things?

There's still time poop chute pirate!
 

Forum List

Back
Top