Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just notification, no alerts, no warnings, no evacuations. Just procedure.
yup, but keep in mind it's the very same GE mark 5 reactor as f*ckoshima, the very same one that GE engineers quit in protest over, and the very same one the union od concernen scientists condemned
But the difference is the lack of a 40ft wall of water with less than an hours warning.
They are experiencing river flooding, something far more predictable.
Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
Also since Fukishima every nuke plant has probably been going over thier facilities for the exact situation that hit Japan.
Edited-Meister This is an actual current event that can turn catastrophic as it did in Japan"!
Containment building flooded at Nebraska nuke plant in order to cool fuel rods
From the air the nuclear plant looks like it is about to be swallowed up by the Missouri River but on the ground you can see that man is controlling nature, or at least keeping her in check.
Jeff Hanson says, “We’re protected far above where this is projected to go.
The facility was taken offline to refuel earlier this year so the containment building has been flooded by OPPD in order to cool the fuel rods.
Containment building flooded at Nebraska nuke plant in order to cool fuel rods « Energy News
http://www.radio4all.net/files/thek...h_Robert_Knight_-_WBAI_Five_OClock_Shadow.mp3
Um no, it cannot.
The main cause of raiation in japan was from the release of gases to releive pressure, coupled with a meltdown of 3 of the reactors. Here the reactors are OFF.
and from what I have read (cant find link for some reason) the measures taken and the notice to the NRCB was due to a 2 degree increase in the cooling pool.
Just notification, no alerts, no warnings, no evacuations. Just procedure.
Just notification, no alerts, no warnings, no evacuations. Just procedure.
yup, but keep in mind it's the very same GE mark 5 reactor as f*ckoshima, the very same one that GE engineers quit in protest over, and the very same one the union od concernen scientists condemned
But the difference is the lack of a 40ft wall of water with less than an hours warning.
They are experiencing river flooding, something far more predictable.
Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
Also since Fukishima every nuke plant has probably been going over thier facilities for the exact situation that hit Japan.
So are you saying the fuel rods aren't radioactive?Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
"So, someone builds a nuclear power plant at the bend of a river that floods every single year. And despite prior problems with flooding, nobody wants to spend the money to start putting key equipment up on risers or towers. And now the power station is starting to flood, and as was the case with the Fukushima sea wall, money was saved by building flood barriers at the legally required minimum. While the reactor itself was shut down for re-fueling, a fire broke out in the electrical system and cooling was lost for the spent fuel rod cooling pool, the same problem now plaguing Fukushima's building #4. Yes, the Power Plant is saying there has been no release of radiation, but that was the same song we heard from TEPCO at the start. The FAA has declared a no-fly zone for two miles around the plant because of "hazard.""--M.Rivero
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn!
YouTube - ‪Arnie Gundersen - Nebraska Nuclear Plant: Emergency Level 4 & About to Get Worse - June 14, 2011‬‏
So the world is not coming to an end?
Well I have not heard any prophecies about the world ending in June 2011 but I think its supposed to next year. Of course if it ends no one will be around to remember it!
Believe me, America will end first before the rest of the world
You mean like you're doing?yup, but keep in mind it's the very same GE mark 5 reactor as f*ckoshima, the very same one that GE engineers quit in protest over, and the very same one the union od concernen scientists condemned
But the difference is the lack of a 40ft wall of water with less than an hours warning.
They are experiencing river flooding, something far more predictable.
Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
Also since Fukishima every nuke plant has probably been going over thier facilities for the exact situation that hit Japan.
What's having the reactors off have to do with anything when the concern is the spent fuel rods? I didn't know there were so many nuclear physicist on this board. No matter what subject is talked about here, everyone all the sudden becomes an expert at it.
So are you saying the fuel rods aren't radioactive?Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
You mean like you're doing?But the difference is the lack of a 40ft wall of water with less than an hours warning.
They are experiencing river flooding, something far more predictable.
Oh yeah, I forgot. THE REACTOR IS OFF.
Also since Fukishima every nuke plant has probably been going over thier facilities for the exact situation that hit Japan.
What's having the reactors off have to do with anything when the concern is the spent fuel rods? I didn't know there were so many nuclear physicist on this board. No matter what subject is talked about here, everyone all the sudden becomes an expert at it.
You mean like you're doing?What's having the reactors off have to do with anything when the concern is the spent fuel rods? I didn't know there were so many nuclear physicist on this board. No matter what subject is talked about here, everyone all the sudden becomes an expert at it.
I also have a Masters degree in Chemical Engineering, which means unless you have a degree in physics or a Nuclear Engineering degree I am probably more qualifed to respond on this than you are.
"So, someone builds a nuclear power plant at the bend of a river that floods every single year. And despite prior problems with flooding, nobody wants to spend the money to start putting key equipment up on risers or towers. And now the power station is starting to flood, and as was the case with the Fukushima sea wall, money was saved by building flood barriers at the legally required minimum. While the reactor itself was shut down for re-fueling, a fire broke out in the electrical system and cooling was lost for the spent fuel rod cooling pool, the same problem now plaguing Fukushima's building #4. Yes, the Power Plant is saying there has been no release of radiation, but that was the same song we heard from TEPCO at the start. The FAA has declared a no-fly zone for two miles around the plant because of "hazard.""--M.Rivero
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn!
YouTube - ‪Arnie Gundersen - Nebraska Nuclear Plant: Emergency Level 4 & About to Get Worse - June 14, 2011‬‏
Leave it to the king of the truthtards to scamper off to his conspiratard site to get the "REAL" scoop! Yes, folks! Regardless of what is said, Nebraska is going to end up like Fukushima! Except it was only the primary systems that failed for a short period of time, the coolant never reached unsafe levels, and backup systems were never needed. Oh.... and there were no explosions or containment breaches. Hmmm. Seems to me the only thing Fukushima and the Nebraska site share is the fact they are nuclear power plants.
Leave it to the rabidly paranoid to pretend everything is a massive emergency and coverup!
3 threads on this non-sense.
Damn dood, get a clue, shit happens and there's been no harm.
Awww, isn't that cute! The little bitch got his panties in a twist because someone dared to expose his fearmongering! Your pathetic attempts at deflection aren't going to work, shitbag."So, someone builds a nuclear power plant at the bend of a river that floods every single year. And despite prior problems with flooding, nobody wants to spend the money to start putting key equipment up on risers or towers. And now the power station is starting to flood, and as was the case with the Fukushima sea wall, money was saved by building flood barriers at the legally required minimum. While the reactor itself was shut down for re-fueling, a fire broke out in the electrical system and cooling was lost for the spent fuel rod cooling pool, the same problem now plaguing Fukushima's building #4. Yes, the Power Plant is saying there has been no release of radiation, but that was the same song we heard from TEPCO at the start. The FAA has declared a no-fly zone for two miles around the plant because of "hazard.""--M.Rivero
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn!
YouTube - ‪Arnie Gundersen - Nebraska Nuclear Plant: Emergency Level 4 & About to Get Worse - June 14, 2011‬‏
Leave it to the king of the truthtards to scamper off to his conspiratard site to get the "REAL" scoop! Yes, folks! Regardless of what is said, Nebraska is going to end up like Fukushima! Except it was only the primary systems that failed for a short period of time, the coolant never reached unsafe levels, and backup systems were never needed. Oh.... and there were no explosions or containment breaches. Hmmm. Seems to me the only thing Fukushima and the Nebraska site share is the fact they are nuclear power plants.
Leave it to the rabidly paranoid to pretend everything is a massive emergency and coverup!
The flooding is what is concerning residents, or maybe you didn't even watch the video and what was said by newscrews, and Gunderson, and expert on the topic of nuclear power.
As for being overly paranoid, you are the conspiracy nutcase who thinks the truth movement is trying to take over the government
"Instead of being a patriot standing up for what you believe is right, you lie your sorry ass off trying to get people to overthrow the government.
"Yet instead of fighting what is wrong in government, you make up bullshit and try to foment rebellion."
You're a fucking joke and a hypocritical nutcase, who has NO credibility, and a proven liar, so STFU, the people in NE. have a legitimate concern.
Why is this in the conspiracy forum? A level 4 is the lowest classification and denotes "notification of unusual event".