Asclepias
Diamond Member
Thats the entire premise of evolution....that it started life. I propose a different scenario where a master engineer created the life forms and put into action evolution to facilitate natural selection. I see this signature all around me everyday.I never claimed "no other explanation" was proof. Since there is no proof evolution started the process your logic fails miserably and cuts the throat of your own argument. That was sheer ignorance.Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
That's a ridiculous argument for creationism. "Unmistakable signature of a master engineer"? That either implies that this "signature" is known for something else, which it's not because there is nothing else like the beginning of life, or, and this is really why ignorant people make statements like this, there is no other explanation. Guess what, no other explanation does not constitute proof. Here's why. If anybody offers another explanation then the "no other explanation" argument automatically fails. And evolution is another explanation. Major fail!
I never claimed evolution started the process, actually I don't believe anybody has ever claimed evolution started life. I am simply playing devils advocate to your eloquently worded, yet meritless statement of unmistakable signature of a master engineer. So you tell me, since you made the statement, where else have you see this unmistakable signature?