Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Natural Selection is the correct and most descriptive term. "Selection" refers to the species that survived natures trials and by default were "selected" to survive. "Elimination" would refer to the irrelevant species that failed the test. Take for example neanderthals.Selection... That is the problem. It seems that the choice to use the word selection, has been a large impedance to the understanding of evolution. Selection invokes in the minds of many, the notion that some "choice" has been made. Which simply isn't the case.
No creature ever made a conscious decision to alter its genetic make up. The environment never made a conscious decision, as to which creatures will survive, and which will perish.
A more suitable, and easily understood method of describing how evolution works would be Natural Elimination.
As situations, and conditions change; those who are not suited to survive the change are eliminated from the breeding pool. Leaving all that do remain, suited to their current environment.
It just seems like a poor choice of wordings to aptly describe what really happens in the evolutionary process.
Labeled as it currently is; sounds every bit as absurd as the creationists argument. Its time the scientific, and educational system got with the times; and updated the way they explain this topic. If you need any proof go over to the religion section. Even in this day and age you have grown adults who are ignorant about evolution, and still prefer superstition, and fairy tales, over evidence, and facts.No. It isn't okay.
Educators need to do better.
LOL Another person demonstrating a total ignorance of what the DNA mapping has told us. Each of us, in every cell of our body, has the evolutionary history of our species. We can show our relationship to all the other life that has been, or is, at present.Sorry. The discovery of DNA did away with the idea of evolutionary progress. Once science realized that even a single celled amoeba has an embedded complex digital code, the question of the origin of life becomes, "Who designed the digital code?"
Then they found out that DNA is self correcting. What that means is for a species to "morph" into a different species, it would have to make the exact same DNA "mistake" millions of times to create something new. And yet DNA does the opposite. It attempts to correct. If Darwin was right, we should be walking on the bones of the transitional process from one species to another. Yet we can't even find one monkey/man. The pretend evolutionary chart was made up of jaws of monkeys glued onto the craniums of men. It is fake.
Labeled as it currently is; sounds every bit as absurd as the creationists argument. Its time the scientific, and educational system got with the times; and updated the way they explain this topic. If you need any proof go over to the religion section. Even in this day and age you have grown adults who are ignorant about evolution, and still prefer superstition, and fairy tales, over evidence, and facts.No. It isn't okay.
Educators need to do better.
Propagation of the species by survival of the fittest sounds Darwinian to me.
Dont get upset but do you consider white people to be a DNA malfunction? You know that unless unnatural steps are taken Nature will correct its mistake.Labeled as it currently is; sounds every bit as absurd as the creationists argument. Its time the scientific, and educational system got with the times; and updated the way they explain this topic. If you need any proof go over to the religion section. Even in this day and age you have grown adults who are ignorant about evolution, and still prefer superstition, and fairy tales, over evidence, and facts.No. It isn't okay.
Educators need to do better.
Propagation of the species by survival of the fittest sounds Darwinian to me.
Actually, that part is correct. Survival of the fittest insures the DNA stays true to the species and remains strong in the offspring. DNA malfunctions die off. Another reason why evolution doesn't work. It relies on millions of years of the exact same defect occurring to create a completely different species. Turns out it is actually imprinted in DNA NOT to make the same mistake twice.
Often if an animal has a defect, the others will kill it and prevent the defect from reoccurring. And where are the millions of years worth of "transition species" bones?
Who created the library of vital information within a cell to enable it to sustain it's life? If you think random pond slime did it, google some information on the complexity of DNA.
Ignorance in the face of facts, is a problem. Just letting it go isn't the answer. These same people continue to have kids, and teach them the same creationist nonsense.Labeled as it currently is; sounds every bit as absurd as the creationists argument. Its time the scientific, and educational system got with the times; and updated the way they explain this topic. If you need any proof go over to the religion section. Even in this day and age you have grown adults who are ignorant about evolution, and still prefer superstition, and fairy tales, over evidence, and facts.No. It isn't okay.
Educators need to do better.
Why? What difference does it make if somebody doesn't accept evolution? Sounds like you just want to argue, but the reality is that there are plenty of successful and productive people who do not accept evolution, and renaming or giving it another label is not going to change their mind. Further more, there are many successful and productive people who accept strict creationism. You're trying to fix a problem where one doesn't exist.
Have you found any links? Names and bodies of work to back up your claims? I'm still waiting here... You've made a bunch of rather outlandish claims and have offered absolutely no supporting evidence whatsoever.LOL Another person demonstrating a total ignorance of what the DNA mapping has told us. Each of us, in every cell of our body, has the evolutionary history of our species. We can show our relationship to all the other life that has been, or is, at present.Sorry. The discovery of DNA did away with the idea of evolutionary progress. Once science realized that even a single celled amoeba has an embedded complex digital code, the question of the origin of life becomes, "Who designed the digital code?"
Then they found out that DNA is self correcting. What that means is for a species to "morph" into a different species, it would have to make the exact same DNA "mistake" millions of times to create something new. And yet DNA does the opposite. It attempts to correct. If Darwin was right, we should be walking on the bones of the transitional process from one species to another. Yet we can't even find one monkey/man. The pretend evolutionary chart was made up of jaws of monkeys glued onto the craniums of men. It is fake.
^That is a giant crock of shit. Digital codes do not happen randomly. Not in computers, not in humans, not in animals, not in amoebas.
According to creation, all life was created fully formed. Even the simplest single-celled organism is extremely complex, with highly-sophisticated parts, all performing important functions and all mutually interdependent. Even a protein molecule, consisting of a chain of hundreds of precisely arranged amino acids, could never arise by chance. As in never. And such a protein molecule is trivial compared to any of the working parts of a cell. < All of these parts must be present and functioning at the startof the life of the single celled amoeba for it to have survived. The belief that the single celled organism evolved from simple to complex was shot to hell by DNA. Amoebas HAVE NO ANCESTORS. They were intricate from the start. Non-life does not create intricate, complex, fully functioning life. DNA killed Darwin.
Links links links... you cannot seem to produce one shred of supporting evidence that backs up your claims...LOL Another person demonstrating a total ignorance of what the DNA mapping has told us. Each of us, in every cell of our body, has the evolutionary history of our species. We can show our relationship to all the other life that has been, or is, at present.Sorry. The discovery of DNA did away with the idea of evolutionary progress. Once science realized that even a single celled amoeba has an embedded complex digital code, the question of the origin of life becomes, "Who designed the digital code?"
Then they found out that DNA is self correcting. What that means is for a species to "morph" into a different species, it would have to make the exact same DNA "mistake" millions of times to create something new. And yet DNA does the opposite. It attempts to correct. If Darwin was right, we should be walking on the bones of the transitional process from one species to another. Yet we can't even find one monkey/man. The pretend evolutionary chart was made up of jaws of monkeys glued onto the craniums of men. It is fake.
^That is a giant crock of shit. Digital codes do not happen randomly. Not in computers, not in humans, not in animals, not in amoebas.
According to creation, all life was created fully formed. Even the simplest single-celled organism is extremely complex, with highly-sophisticated parts, all performing important functions and all mutually interdependent. Even a protein molecule, consisting of a chain of hundreds of precisely arranged amino acids, could never arise by chance. As in never. And such a protein molecule is trivial compared to any of the working parts of a cell. < All of these parts must be present and functioning at the startof the life of the single celled amoeba for it to have survived. The belief that the single celled organism evolved from simple to complex was shot to hell by DNA. Amoebas HAVE NO ANCESTORS. They were intricate from the start. Non-life does not create intricate, complex, fully functioning life. DNA killed Darwin.
Can you show this unmistakeable signature to us? Surely there are many pictures specifically of this signature we can compare...?Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
Binary. Everything is binary and fractal in nature.Can you show this unmistakeable signature to us? Surely there are many pictures specifically of this signature we can compare...?Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
That isn't unmistakably the "signature of a master engineer" as you put it. Unless you have some way of linking this observation to said "master engineer".Binary. Everything is binary and fractal in nature.Can you show this unmistakeable signature to us? Surely there are many pictures specifically of this signature we can compare...?Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
.
its by implication. No one can prove "god" exists but its plain life follows a common blueprint as well as inanimate objects. Someone wrote that blueprint.That isn't unmistakably the "signature of a master engineer" as you put it. Unless you have some way of linking this observation to said "master engineer".Binary. Everything is binary and fractal in nature.Can you show this unmistakeable signature to us? Surely there are many pictures specifically of this signature we can compare...?Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
.
Ignorance in the face of facts, is a problem. Just letting it go isn't the answer. These same people continue to have kids, and teach them the same creationist nonsense.Labeled as it currently is; sounds every bit as absurd as the creationists argument. Its time the scientific, and educational system got with the times; and updated the way they explain this topic. If you need any proof go over to the religion section. Even in this day and age you have grown adults who are ignorant about evolution, and still prefer superstition, and fairy tales, over evidence, and facts.No. It isn't okay.
Educators need to do better.
Why? What difference does it make if somebody doesn't accept evolution? Sounds like you just want to argue, but the reality is that there are plenty of successful and productive people who do not accept evolution, and renaming or giving it another label is not going to change their mind. Further more, there are many successful and productive people who accept strict creationism. You're trying to fix a problem where one doesn't exist.
Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
I never claimed "no other explanation" was proof. Since there is no proof evolution started the process your logic fails miserably and cuts the throat of your own argument. That was sheer ignorance.Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
That's a ridiculous argument for creationism. "Unmistakable signature of a master engineer"? That either implies that this "signature" is known for something else, which it's not because there is nothing else like the beginning of life, or, and this is really why ignorant people make statements like this, there is no other explanation. Guess what, no other explanation does not constitute proof. Here's why. If anybody offers another explanation then the "no other explanation" argument automatically fails. And evolution is another explanation. Major fail!
I never claimed "no other explanation" was proof. Since there is no proof evolution started the process your logic fails miserably and cuts the throat of your own argument. That was sheer ignorance.Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
That's a ridiculous argument for creationism. "Unmistakable signature of a master engineer"? That either implies that this "signature" is known for something else, which it's not because there is nothing else like the beginning of life, or, and this is really why ignorant people make statements like this, there is no other explanation. Guess what, no other explanation does not constitute proof. Here's why. If anybody offers another explanation then the "no other explanation" argument automatically fails. And evolution is another explanation. Major fail!
There is no evidence to suggest "someone wrote that blueprint" as you put it it. Your falling into the age old trap of "I don't understand... Therefore God".its by implication. No one can prove "god" exists but its plain life follows a common blueprint as well as inanimate objects. Someone wrote that blueprint.That isn't unmistakably the "signature of a master engineer" as you put it. Unless you have some way of linking this observation to said "master engineer".Binary. Everything is binary and fractal in nature.Can you show this unmistakeable signature to us? Surely there are many pictures specifically of this signature we can compare...?Here is what happened. Someone or something created the first life forms. From there evolution took over. Evolution is already proven. If you look at all life and even non-life there is the unmistakable signature of a master engineer.
.
