Yurt
Gold Member
LOL - IF that is true Yurt, then why did the law need to be codified as such in 1964? Oh that's right because our federal justice system is codified laws, not common laws.
Failure
how anyone can be such a moron is beyond me...
even wiki answers says you a total moron
Answer
Yes and no. Usually the "Supreme Law of the Land" refers to the Constitution of the United States. According to Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution, however, the "Supreme Law of the Land" means "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof." We usually take this to mean enacted laws, or laws made by a legislative body, like Congress, but it can also mean common law, or laws made as a result of judicial decisions.
Supreme Court decisions make common law, which is enforceable and carries the rule of law, so it must also be in compliance with the Constitution. In that sense, rulings by the Supreme Court could be considered part of the "Supreme Law of the Land," as long as they are constitutionally sound.
WikiAnswers - Are rulings by the US Supreme Court considered the 'Supreme Law of the Land'
if you like i can get a more grown up source, but i thought i would use this source as a way of showing just how stupid you really are
You know Yurtie, this could actually be an interesting discussion, but the fact that you are acting like a baby means I won't participate.
That being said, you and I and everyone else in here knows that Ravi was NOT referring to a court ruling having the effect of law. if she had meant that she would have no reason to correct me when I said a COURT ORDER. We all understand that a court order can be enforced just the same way as a law can be. She instead tried to unsuccessfully argue a LAW was in place, NOT a court order.
The ONY reason you are in here defending her now is because your feelers are hurt over being called a pussy about whining about art's death wish for a week. It certainly isn't because you think Ravi is some great thinker. If you'd like I'd be happy to find numerous posts from you insulting Ravi, so that's some strange bedfellows right there.
more lies and more lies....i've argued against you before that art thing, (stealing remember liar)then you went on "vacation"....i was tired of your bullshit long before that and you know it mr. your wife is a lawyer bullshit, you even acknowledged it upon returning from your so called vacation
its clear you know you're wrong here, but instead of maturely admitting it, you simply attack me and ravi...ravi and i may disagree, but we can still get along, we're not rabid like you
you're wrong and it cracks me up that even wiki answers says you're a moron