Discussion in 'Congress' started by Laine, Apr 10, 2008.
*Ouch* That HAD to hurt.
Oh pooh! Seriously. I'm not going to sit here and say the dems stood up like they should have. but they also didn't have a veto-proof majority.
and thanks to your lovely little megalomaniac, we have 4,010 troops dead and heaven knows how many Iraqis... , our economy is beyond messed up, we have debt my future grandchildren will be paying and our environment has been abused
but y'all keep standing on principle and wasting your vote, and wasting our time and trying to saddle us with losers so you can "advance progressive politics"....
Losing that " bright" hope of a Black racist in the White House Jillian?
are you kidding me?
Like I said, 8 years of Bush will do more in 08 for dems than a Naderite's wet dream could possibly touch.
Look, I didn't come here to sling mud. I haven't said a single word to insult any of you or your beliefs at least I haven't intended to. Rather than intelligibly discuss the topic you have reduced yourself to one liners in an attempt to undermine the intent of this post. If you disagree with Mr. Nader then fine but at least give a just reason for your belief rather than taking in the spoon fed rhetoric of the Democratic Party. I question; Obama, Clinton, McCain and other candidates on their policies and would hope the same could be afforded to third party and independent candidates.
LLaine do you think Gore would have invaded Iraq?
I don't think Gore would have invaded Afghanistan.
You assholes should have listened to Harry Brown after 9/11.
When will we learn pt 1-4
good point Patriot.
course which is worse?
invading Afghanistan and failing to achieve the objective...and costing billions
or not invading, costing nothing, and possibly still catching OBL through other means?
let me know.
When did this happen?
Separate names with a comma.