N.Y. Times allows leader of ISIS to escape!

[TyroneSlothrop]

who the fuck is going to believe Fox and Friends ...its one Hundred percent Fake

 

[nat4900]

Obama who reluctantly allowed the Seals to capture bin Laden based on intel from the Bush admin...

You traitors are so full of shit.

You are definitely part of 32% of Trump ass kissers who don't believe that Donnie baby met with the Russians....EVEN when Donnie-baby tells you he did......I mean, after all, you ARE an idiot......LOL

 

[g5000]

By leaking intelligence information regarding Benghadi the head of ISIS the N.Y. times made it possible for Benghadi to escape. Truly dispicable....time to bring the leakers before a court of justice.

ISIS broken, but leader slipped away due to leak, says key general

Benghadi?

You're getting your partisan outrages conflated, son.

 

[whitehall]

You have to wonder if the NYT intentionally leaked the target of U.S. bombing out of hatred for the President. You have to admit it's quite likely given the political climate and the radical left would support it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Lol..they see conspiracies 5 steps deep...but Trump meeting with Russians doesn't mean he met with Russians.

 

[g5000]

By leaking intelligence information regarding Benghadi the head of ISIS the N.Y. times made it possible for Benghadi to escape. Truly dispicable....time to bring the leakers before a court of justice.

ISIS broken, but leader slipped away due to leak, says key general

Hey dumbshits.

The Pentagon issued a press release the day of the raid announcing they had captured Abu Sayyaf's wife. So it was the Pentagon which "leaked" that information, not the New York Times.

The NYT didn't report her capture until three weeks later.

Here is the Pentagon press release: Statement by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter on Counter-ISIL Operation in Syria > U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE > News Release View

U.S. forces captured Umm Sayyaf, who we suspect is a member of ISIL, played an important role in ISIL's terrorist activities, and may have been complicit in what appears to have been the enslavement of a young Yezidi woman rescued last night.

The Naked Emperor and all of you have just been made fools of by yet more fake Fox News.

 

[Lewdog]

I have a feeling that several Trump supporters are reading this thread and making blind comments without researching and reading the information. This seems to be a trend among them.

Baghdadi is dead. The NY Times only printed the information after getting approval from the Federal government... it's against the law to print information without approval that can put American lives at risk. If the NY Times had broken the law, you can bet your ass they would be in trouble right now... and the only trouble they are facing is that Fox and Trump supporters are spreading lies about the story.

 

[g5000]

Barack Obama relentlessly pursues Bin Laden and as soon as he is found he sends in the Seals to kill him.

Trump is at war with US intelligence agencies and he ignores their briefings. But his supporters believe newspapers should be blamed for Trump's incompetence.

No, their leaking information

Their?

You were hoaxed once again by Fox News, son.

 

[g5000]

The NY Times serves at the pleasure of the NWO Globalist Elites. And those Elites despise Donald Trump. He's not going along with their NWO. He's advocating putting Americans first. The NWO degenerates can't tolerate that. They could care less about American Citizens.

The NY Times is Fake News. It's paid to do a job. And that job is to destroy anyone who won't go along with the NWO Globalist agenda. Anything that can possibly hurt Trump, it's gonna fully support. Even helping ISIS Terrorists. Trump's their #1 target. I'll continue to pray for him.

You and Trump were hoaxed once again by Fox News, son.

 

[g5000]

It won't make a difference when the rubes find out they were hoaxed by Fox.

Trump and they will get right back in line to be lied to again.

 

[Doc1]

Lol..they see conspiracies 5 steps deep...but Trump meeting with Russians doesn't mean he met with Russians.

No wonder you are no longer a Mod, you're a leftwing pussy. You'll cry about Booooosh next.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Lol..they see conspiracies 5 steps deep...but Trump meeting with Russians doesn't mean he met with Russians.

No wonder you are no longer a Mod, you're a leftwing pussy. You'll cry about Booooosh next.

I was never a mod goofball

 

[Statistikhengst]

By leaking intelligence information regarding Benghadi the head of ISIS the N.Y. times made it possible for Benghadi to escape. Truly dispicable....time to bring the leakers before a court of justice.

ISIS broken, but leader slipped away due to leak, says key general

It happened on Trump's watch, therefore it is ALL HIS FAULT, because that is the shit you monkey threw at Obama 24/7 for 8 long years over every little pittance. So, Trump let Bagdadi go. Trump is a traitor and a whore.

There, glad we could settle that.

 

[beagle9]

Barack Obama relentlessly pursues Bin Laden and as soon as he is found he sends in the Seals to kill him.

Trump is at war with US intelligence agencies and he ignores their briefings. But his supporters believe newspapers should be blamed for Trump's incompetence.

. Barack was working off Intel Bush and crew had already worked up using water boarding etc. So it was easy for Barack to take credit while keeping his wittle hands cwean.

 

[beagle9]

who the fuck is going to believe Fox and Friends ...its one Hundred percent Fake

. You want to level the play score board bad don't cha ?? Fox gotta lot of catching up to do in order to become the fake news champions like the other networks have long since become. I don't think Fox could catch up if they wanted to.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Fox & Friends Spreads Fake News About NYT & The Times Just Hit Back Hard

The NYT states, quite simply, that Gen. Thomas’ comments are incorrect. According to the paper, their story about the raid Thomas refers to came more than three weeks after the raid, following a public announcement from the Pentagon that they were closing in on the terror leader. The paper states, besides just the fact that the raid at the center of the lead on al-Baghdadi’s whereabouts took place weeks before their story, that they showed their story to the Defense Department prior to publication and got approval.

Follow
Hadas Gold ✔ @Hadas_Gold

New York Times has asked fox and friends for an apology

3:50 PM - 23 Jul 2017

So you're saying the ISIS supporting traitors at the NY Times wrote this?

But your link is to a Fascist hate site, one of the Soros sewers you feed from.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Barack Obama relentlessly pursues Bin Laden and as soon as he is found he sends in the Seals to kill him.

Trump is at war with US intelligence agencies and he ignores their briefings. But his supporters believe newspapers should be blamed for Trump's incompetence.

. Barack was working off Intel Bush and crew had already worked up using water boarding etc. So it was easy for Barack to take credit while keeping his wittle hands cwean.

And damned near scuttled the raid.

 

[jillian]

By leaking intelligence information regarding Benghadi the head of ISIS the N.Y. times made it possible for Benghadi to escape. Truly dispicable....time to bring the leakers before a court of justice.

ISIS broken, but leader slipped away due to leak, says key general

how does a newspaper allow anyone to "escape"

are you really that much of a lying loon?

oh wait... never mind.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Obama who reluctantly allowed the Seals to capture bin Laden based on intel from the Bush admin...

You traitors are so full of shit.

You are definitely part of 32% of Trump ass kissers who don't believe that Donnie baby met with the Russians....EVEN when Donnie-baby tells you he did......I mean, after all, you ARE an idiot......LOL

Facts are facts traitor boi.

{
At the start of his presidency, Miniter writes, Obama was ‘studiously undecided’ about whether to kill the mastermind of 9/11.

‘He refused to weigh in or commit himself on even small matters related to a possible strike on bin Laden.’

He continues: ‘Obama was often disengaged as the bin Laden operation took shape; he left critical decisions to the then-CIA Director Leon Panetta, then-Secretary of Defence Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

‘Obama feared taking responsibility for a risky raid that might go tragically wrong.’

Initially, Miniter writes, Obama deferred to Jarrett over whether to go after bin Laden.

‘Jarrett opposed the idea. She worried about a backlash against the president if the operation failed, or even if it succeeded. Clinton privately fumed about Jarrett’s relentless presence and her injection of political considerations at every turn.

‘Throughout 2009 Obama demanded more and more certainty about U.S. intelligence concerning bin Laden. Jarrett repeatedly reminded Obama and other executive-branch officials that the president had campaigned on the “intelligence failures” of the Bush years.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Obama 'cancelled missions to kill bin Laden THREE TIMES after getting cold feet - until Hillary Clinton stepped in', claims explosive new book | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook}

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lol..they see conspiracies 5 steps deep...but Trump meeting with Russians doesn't mean he met with Russians.

No wonder you are no longer a Mod, you're a leftwing pussy. You'll cry about Booooosh next.

I was never a mod goofball

Frankly, you're no more partisan than The Doctor is In or Coyote.