Myths and facts about Jerusalem and Temple Mount

Suomi - Finland / Soviet Finland

Soumi only Hoss although the Ruskies did harvest some of the Finns land after WW2

Finns are NOT fond of Russia,Soviet Union or CCCP.

Trust you are well Matey.....steve:cool:
I know it's Suomi. However the customs stickers on a car in Europe have E for Spain (Espania), D for Germany (Deutschland) and SF for Soumi/Finland. Therefore, Soviet Finland we called it.

For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
 
Bible may say it but who in history ADHERES to such sentiment........????? as the Jews know full well:D

Ever hear of the 10 Commandments, inbred? Leviticus is inscribed on the Liberty Bell: "Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land" "Love Thy Neighbor As Thyself" is the model for the Golden Rule.

Take your meds, psycho.

Such an Idiot,I repeat,the Bible may Say IT...but NO ONE ADHERES TO IT.....So your abuse is INFANTILE.JERK


Constitutional Rights Foundation: The Hebrews and the Foundation of Western Law
The Ten Commandments and many other elements of Hebrew law provided a major source for the development of western legal systems and democracy.

Three thousand years ago, the ancient Hebrew people lived in the Near East in an area called Canaan. This ancient people developed the idea of monotheism, the belief in one god. They believed that their god gave them laws to regulate their society, their religious practices, and their relationships with other people.

Conquered by the neo-Babylonians and later by the Romans, the Hebrews eventually became a scattered people, living in many countries under different legal systems. But they continued to develop their own law and tried to follow it even in foreign lands. Their law was based on the Ten Commandments and other sacred writings, which today we find in the Hebrew Bible. In developing their law, they sometimes borrowed legal concepts from other civilizations as well as passing on their own ideas. The Jewish law that developed influenced Roman law, English law, and our own Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Equality
The Torah teaches that God created Adam, the first human, as the father of all peoples. Thus, all humans are born equal and should be treated equally by the law. This is today recognized as a major principle of law.

The Rule of Law
The Torah does not recognize the idea of kings ruling by divine right. According to tradition, the Hebrew people made Saul their first king in 1030 B.C., when enemy nations threatened their survival. But Saul and the other Hebrew kings that followed him were never considered to be gods or high priests with the power to interpret God’s will.

Hebrew kings, like everyone else, had to obey the Ten Commandments and the other laws of the Torah. The written Torah, not the whims of kings, was considered the law of the land.

Majority Rule and Democracy
The Hebrew concept of majority rule comes from the Torah’s command to “follow the multitude.” The majority decided disputes among scholars on the meaning of God’s laws, the court decisions of judges, and the local acts of Jewish communities.

Since Jews lived under the rule of foreign nations after A.D. 70, they practiced only limited forms of self-government. By the 12th century, however, many countries permitted Jewish communities to elect local town councils, the “Seven Good Men of the City.” These councils, chosen by the majority of adult males, supervised religious, economic, educational, and charity activities. The entire community often decided important questions at a town meeting.

Freedom of Religion and Speech
Being born a Jew makes one obligated to follow the Torah. But Jews must do this freely. Non-Jews have the freedom to practice their own religions. Moreover, unlike most other religions, Judaism does not actively seek converts.

A tradition of free speech existed among the Hebrews. Hebrew prophets openly spoke out against their kings and the people for failing to follow the Torah. During the long history of disputes over the meaning of the Torah, no one was tried for heresy (going against religious doctrine). Also, while the majority decided matters of law, the minority had a chance to be heard and their opinions were often recorded.

Fair Trial
In Judea, the court system had three levels. The highest court was the Great Sandedrin, which had 71 judges. Lesser courts with 23 judges dealt with death penalty cases. Lower courts with three judges handled most civil and criminal matters. Most of these courts stopped functioning after the Romans destroyed the temple in Jerusalem. In countries where they were permitted to operate, however, three-judge courts continued to hand out justice in Jewish communities.

Many parts of the Torah, Talmud, and the codes of law that followed described due process procedures to ensure fair trials. Anyone accused of a crime had the right of bail except in death-penalty cases. Traditional Jewish courts had no trained lawyers arguing cases. The prosecutor was either the victim himself or, if he had been killed, a relative (“blood-avenger”) or someone appointed by the court. The accused could defend himself or ask another to plead for him. Evidence included documents and the testimony of witnesses. The consistent testimony of two male witnesses to the crime was necessary to convict the accused. The judges closely cross-examined witnesses in the presence of the accused. Circumstantial evidence alone was never enough to find someone guilty. Witnesses who broke the commandment forbidding one to “bear false witness” faced the same penalty that the accused would have suffered. The accused had an absolute right against self-incrimination and was not permitted to make statements harmful to himself. Likewise, confessions were not admissible evidence in court. There was no jury. The judges deliberated with the accused looking on. The youngest judge spoke his opinion first in order to avoid being influenced by the senior judges. The judges then decided the verdict by majority vote
BRIA 16 4 a The Hebrews and the Foundation of Western Law - Constitutional Rights Foundation
 
Soumi only Hoss although the Ruskies did harvest some of the Finns land after WW2

Finns are NOT fond of Russia,Soviet Union or CCCP.

Trust you are well Matey.....steve:cool:
I know it's Suomi. However the customs stickers on a car in Europe have E for Spain (Espania), D for Germany (Deutschland) and SF for Soumi/Finland. Therefore, Soviet Finland we called it.

For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".
 
I know it's Suomi. However the customs stickers on a car in Europe have E for Spain (Espania), D for Germany (Deutschland) and SF for Soumi/Finland. Therefore, Soviet Finland we called it.

For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter
 
For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

Islam is an amoral cult that advocates lying, called taqiyya. Trust the muhammadan to your peril
 
For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

But some have claimed this"DOG SHIT" rosie,I'm talking the Jewish lobby on here.so it's extremely encouraging to see you are ignoring them......steve
 
Last edited:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

Islam is an amoral cult that advocates lying, called taqiyya. Trust the muhammadan to your peril

IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU :eek:
 
Last edited:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

But some have claimed this"DOG SHIT" rosie,I'm talking the Jewish lobby on here.so it's extremely encouraging to see you are ignoring them......steve

You mean the Christian lobby, psycho :cuckoo:

Christians United For Israel...
Christians United for Israel has grown to become the largest pro-Israel organization in the United States and one of the leading Christian grassroots movements in the world. CUFI spans all fifty states and reaches millions with our message. Each year CUFI holds hundreds of pro-Israel events in cities around the country. And each July, thousands of pro-Israel Christians gather in Washington, D.C. to participate in the CUFI Washington Summit and make their voices heard in support of Israel and the Jewish people.
Our impact has been immediate. Our growth has been phenomenal. And we've only just begun.
Welcome - Christians United for Israel
 
I know it's Suomi. However the customs stickers on a car in Europe have E for Spain (Espania), D for Germany (Deutschland) and SF for Soumi/Finland. Therefore, Soviet Finland we called it.

For the more Studious of Israeli History may wish to know that Jewish football(soccer) teams entered THE PALESTINE LEAGUE as early as the 1931-1932 Season:D:D:D


So much for Palestine not existing prior to 1948.

His Magnificence....H.I.M.:cool:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

Some have Roudy...I shall remind you,next time I see it.steve(please don't expect me to trawl the past posts,to show you as it tends to tax my brain):lol::lol:
 
roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

But some have claimed this"DOG SHIT" rosie,I'm talking the Jewish lobby on here.so it's extremely encouraging to see you are ignoring them......steve

You mean the Christian lobby, psycho :cuckoo:

Christians United For Israel...
Christians United for Israel has grown to become the largest pro-Israel organization in the United States and one of the leading Christian grassroots movements in the world. CUFI spans all fifty states and reaches millions with our message. Each year CUFI holds hundreds of pro-Israel events in cities around the country. And each July, thousands of pro-Israel Christians gather in Washington, D.C. to participate in the CUFI Washington Summit and make their voices heard in support of Israel and the Jewish people.
Our impact has been immediate. Our growth has been phenomenal. And we've only just begun.
Welcome - Christians United for Israel

IS THERE SOMETHING MENTALLY WRONG WITH YOU:cuckoo::eek::eek: Christians for Israel.....SUCH A SHAME YOU HAVE SLAUGHTERED SO MANY JEWS....YOU ARE A JOKE'now take that silver spoon out of your wretched ASS and SHOVE it in your MOUTH
 
Last edited:
Nobody claimed that Palestine "didn't exist before 1948".

roudy---islamo nazis lie. They have stated several times in the
past two days that "jews claim palestine did not exist" ----it is a
technique of their characteristic mendacity ---and a kind of route
for them to CLAIM TRIUMPH when they "prove" the alleged state-
ment wrong. To this point when the sluts and dogs make the
claim that "jews say palestine never existed ---I tend to ignore them
in the same way I ignore a pile of dog shit in the gutter

Islam is an amoral cult that advocates lying, called taqiyya. Trust the muhammadan to your peril

Coming from a FUNDIMENTALIST CHRISTIAN LIKE YOU.....I CAN ONLY ASSUME YOU ARE A BULLSHIT ARTIST..........FUNDIMENTALISTS(IN GENERAL) ARE EVIL BASTARDS....take that to your next RACIST TEA PARTY :cuckoo:ASSEMBLY


theliq:eusa_angel:
 
Ever hear of the 10 Commandments, inbred? Leviticus is inscribed on the Liberty Bell: "Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land" "Love Thy Neighbor As Thyself" is the model for the Golden Rule.

Take your meds, psycho.

Such an Idiot,I repeat,the Bible may Say IT...but NO ONE ADHERES TO IT.....So your abuse is INFANTILE.JERK


Constitutional Rights Foundation: The Hebrews and the Foundation of Western Law
The Ten Commandments and many other elements of Hebrew law provided a major source for the development of western legal systems and democracy.

Three thousand years ago, the ancient Hebrew people lived in the Near East in an area called Canaan. This ancient people developed the idea of monotheism, the belief in one god. They believed that their god gave them laws to regulate their society, their religious practices, and their relationships with other people.

Conquered by the neo-Babylonians and later by the Romans, the Hebrews eventually became a scattered people, living in many countries under different legal systems. But they continued to develop their own law and tried to follow it even in foreign lands. Their law was based on the Ten Commandments and other sacred writings, which today we find in the Hebrew Bible. In developing their law, they sometimes borrowed legal concepts from other civilizations as well as passing on their own ideas. The Jewish law that developed influenced Roman law, English law, and our own Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Equality
The Torah teaches that God created Adam, the first human, as the father of all peoples. Thus, all humans are born equal and should be treated equally by the law. This is today recognized as a major principle of law.

The Rule of Law
The Torah does not recognize the idea of kings ruling by divine right. According to tradition, the Hebrew people made Saul their first king in 1030 B.C., when enemy nations threatened their survival. But Saul and the other Hebrew kings that followed him were never considered to be gods or high priests with the power to interpret God’s will.

Hebrew kings, like everyone else, had to obey the Ten Commandments and the other laws of the Torah. The written Torah, not the whims of kings, was considered the law of the land.

Majority Rule and Democracy
The Hebrew concept of majority rule comes from the Torah’s command to “follow the multitude.” The majority decided disputes among scholars on the meaning of God’s laws, the court decisions of judges, and the local acts of Jewish communities.

Since Jews lived under the rule of foreign nations after A.D. 70, they practiced only limited forms of self-government. By the 12th century, however, many countries permitted Jewish communities to elect local town councils, the “Seven Good Men of the City.” These councils, chosen by the majority of adult males, supervised religious, economic, educational, and charity activities. The entire community often decided important questions at a town meeting.

Freedom of Religion and Speech
Being born a Jew makes one obligated to follow the Torah. But Jews must do this freely. Non-Jews have the freedom to practice their own religions. Moreover, unlike most other religions, Judaism does not actively seek converts.

A tradition of free speech existed among the Hebrews. Hebrew prophets openly spoke out against their kings and the people for failing to follow the Torah. During the long history of disputes over the meaning of the Torah, no one was tried for heresy (going against religious doctrine). Also, while the majority decided matters of law, the minority had a chance to be heard and their opinions were often recorded.

Fair Trial
In Judea, the court system had three levels. The highest court was the Great Sandedrin, which had 71 judges. Lesser courts with 23 judges dealt with death penalty cases. Lower courts with three judges handled most civil and criminal matters. Most of these courts stopped functioning after the Romans destroyed the temple in Jerusalem. In countries where they were permitted to operate, however, three-judge courts continued to hand out justice in Jewish communities.

Many parts of the Torah, Talmud, and the codes of law that followed described due process procedures to ensure fair trials. Anyone accused of a crime had the right of bail except in death-penalty cases. Traditional Jewish courts had no trained lawyers arguing cases. The prosecutor was either the victim himself or, if he had been killed, a relative (“blood-avenger”) or someone appointed by the court. The accused could defend himself or ask another to plead for him. Evidence included documents and the testimony of witnesses. The consistent testimony of two male witnesses to the crime was necessary to convict the accused. The judges closely cross-examined witnesses in the presence of the accused. Circumstantial evidence alone was never enough to find someone guilty. Witnesses who broke the commandment forbidding one to “bear false witness” faced the same penalty that the accused would have suffered. The accused had an absolute right against self-incrimination and was not permitted to make statements harmful to himself. Likewise, confessions were not admissible evidence in court. There was no jury. The judges deliberated with the accused looking on. The youngest judge spoke his opinion first in order to avoid being influenced by the senior judges. The judges then decided the verdict by majority vote
BRIA 16 4 a The Hebrews and the Foundation of Western Law - Constitutional Rights Foundation

Roudy STOP encouraging this Fool.:cool:
 
You have no idea WTF you're talking about so I'll instruct you: Dr. Lewis does not deny the deaths of Armenians under Turkish rule. His view is that the Turks did not intentionally commit genocide.

I do have a fairly good idea what I am talking about, bauble - enough that I have been to Armenia and read all of the major books about the genocide - from 'Musa Dagh' onwards. Have you?

Lewis's position on the genocide is appalling and unforgivable. It disgraced him as a historian, and tarnished his legacy as much as Chomsky's comments on Cambodia tarnished his.

It's also notable that he indirectly received money from a Turkish organisation for his comments, and was caught ghost writing comments for a Turkish ambassador.

Obviously you know all of this since you are such an expert on the man - even more surprising that you continue to quote him as a historian and not as a kind of source-for-hire.

Here's the Wiki overview of the scandal:

On May 19, 1985, The New York Times and The Washington Post ran an advertisement in which a group of 69 American historians called on Congress not to adopt the resolution on the Armenian Genocide. Bernard Lewis, a prominent historian of Islam at Princeton, was among them and so the case was named after him. The advertisement was paid for by the Committee of the Turkish Associations. Another important signee was Heath Lowry, the director of the Institute of Turkish Studies at Georgetown. Lewis and Lowry have been included among the key deniers of the Armenian Genocide and according to Roger W. Smith, Eric Markusen and Robert Jay Lifton, he was also advising on how to prevent mention of the Armenian Genocide in scholarly works, to and was "caught ghosting" for the Turkish ambassador in Washington regarding the denial of the Armenian Genocide. The Armenian Assembly of America and found that many or most of the 69 academics apparently benefited directly or indirectly from Turkish government research grants . According to Yair Auron, an Israeli historian, scholar and expert specializing in Genocide studies and racism, this advertisement is a good example of one of many Turkish attempts to influence academia, a project on which Turkey spends enormous funds

Armenian Genocide denial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone interested in the genocide should start with the stunning "Forty Days at Musa Dagh", it's the "Schindler's List" of the Armenian genocide.
 
You have no idea WTF you're talking about so I'll instruct you: Dr. Lewis does not deny the deaths of Armenians under Turkish rule. His view is that the Turks did not intentionally commit genocide.

I do have a fairly good idea what I am talking about, bauble - enough that I have been to Armenia and read all of the major books about the genocide - from 'Musa Dagh' onwards. Have you?

Lewis's position on the genocide is appalling and unforgivable. It disgraced him as a historian, and tarnished his legacy as much as Chomsky's comments on Cambodia tarnished his.

You're allowed to be an idiot. :clap2:


Bernard Lewis, National Endowment For The Humanities National Humanities Medalist
Bernard Lewis is considered by many to be the greatest living historian of the Muslim world. He has pursued his primary interest, the history of the Ottoman Empire, producing groundbreaking works including The Emergence of Modern Turkey, The Political Language of Islam, The Muslim Discovery of Europe, The Jews of Islam, and Islam and the West. His most recent publication is From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting the Middle East. Other titles by Lewis: The Crisis of Islam: Holy War & Unholy Terror; What Went Wrong: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East; Western Impact and the Middle Eastern Response; A Middle East Mosaic: Fragments of Life, Letters and History; The Multiple Identities of the Middle East; and The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years.

Born in London, England, in 1916, Lewis became attracted to languages and history at an early age. Lewis's interest in history was stirred thanks to his bar mitzvah ceremony, during which he received as a gift a book on Jewish history. He graduated in 1936 from the then School of Oriental Studies (SOAS, now School of Oriental and African Studies) at the University of London with a B.A. in history with special reference to the Near and Middle East, and obtaining his Ph.D. three years later, also from SOAS, specializing in the history of Islam. During the Second World War, Lewis served in the British Army in the Royal Armoured Corps and Intelligence Corps in 1940-41, and was then attached to a department of the Foreign Office. After the war he returned to SOAS, and in 1949 he was appointed to the new chair in Near and Middle Eastern history at the age of 33.

In 1974 Lewis accepted a joint position at Princeton University and the Institute for Advanced Study, marking the beginning of the most prolific period in his research career. In addition, it was in the United States that Lewis became a public intellectual. After his retirement from Princeton in 1986 as the Cleveland E. Dodge Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Lewis held many visiting appointments. Lewis has been a naturalized citizen of the United States since 1982.
President Bush Awards the 2006 National Humanities Medals | National Endowment for the Humanities


The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is an independent federal agency created in 1965. It is one of the largest funders of humanities programs in the United States.

Because democracy demands wisdom, NEH serves and strengthens our republic by promoting excellence in the humanities and conveying the lessons of history to all Americans. The Endowment accomplishes this mission by awarding grants for top-rated proposals examined by panels of independent, external reviewers.

NEH grants typically go to cultural institutions, such as museums, archives, libraries, colleges, universities, public television, and radio stations, and to individual scholars

The National Humanities Medal, inaugurated in 1997, honors individuals or groups whose work has deepened the nation's understanding of the humanities, broadened our citizens' engagement with the humanities, or helped preserve and expand Americans' access to important resources in the humanities. Up to 12 medals can be awarded each year.
About the National Endowment for the Humanities | National Endowment for the Humanities
 
Last edited:
Maryland -

I would never have expected an adult or honest response from you.

You are a child, and you clearly don't even know who your own sources are.
 
Maryland -

I would never have expected an adult or honest response from you.

You are a child, and you clearly don't even know who your own sources are.
whiner-dude.jpg
 
You have no idea WTF you're talking about so I'll instruct you: Dr. Lewis does not deny the deaths of Armenians under Turkish rule. His view is that the Turks did not intentionally commit genocide.

I do have a fairly good idea what I am talking about, bauble - enough that I have been to Armenia and read all of the major books about the genocide - from 'Musa Dagh' onwards. Have you?

Lewis's position on the genocide is appalling and unforgivable. It disgraced him as a historian, and tarnished his legacy as much as Chomsky's comments on Cambodia tarnished his.

It's also notable that he indirectly received money from a Turkish organisation for his comments, and was caught ghost writing comments for a Turkish ambassador.

Obviously you know all of this since you are such an expert on the man - even more surprising that you continue to quote him as a historian and not as a kind of source-for-hire.

Here's the Wiki overview of the scandal:

On May 19, 1985, The New York Times and The Washington Post ran an advertisement in which a group of 69 American historians called on Congress not to adopt the resolution on the Armenian Genocide. Bernard Lewis, a prominent historian of Islam at Princeton, was among them and so the case was named after him. The advertisement was paid for by the Committee of the Turkish Associations. Another important signee was Heath Lowry, the director of the Institute of Turkish Studies at Georgetown. Lewis and Lowry have been included among the key deniers of the Armenian Genocide and according to Roger W. Smith, Eric Markusen and Robert Jay Lifton, he was also advising on how to prevent mention of the Armenian Genocide in scholarly works, to and was "caught ghosting" for the Turkish ambassador in Washington regarding the denial of the Armenian Genocide. The Armenian Assembly of America and found that many or most of the 69 academics apparently benefited directly or indirectly from Turkish government research grants . According to Yair Auron, an Israeli historian, scholar and expert specializing in Genocide studies and racism, this advertisement is a good example of one of many Turkish attempts to influence academia, a project on which Turkey spends enormous funds

Armenian Genocide denial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone interested in the genocide should start with the stunning "Forty Days at Musa Dagh", it's the "Schindler's List" of the Armenian genocide.

The Turks did THE CRIME, now they are good mates with the US,if you go back,America are and have been MATES with so many FERAL REGIMES.

But the TURKS DID THE CRIME.......steve
 

Forum List

Back
Top