LuvRPgrl
Senior Member
- Aug 11, 2005
- 3,163
- 206
- 48
Mariner said:seem to have upset you.
Would you trust a country that covertly propped up a dictator, then sided with your enemy in a recent war? If so, why?
Iran and North Korea have been busy going nuclear while we've been busy defending ourselves against Al Qaeda by attacking Saddam Hussein. If I feel negative about that particular bit of cognitive dissonance, then it's my right.
Don't call me spoiled--I worked very hard for what I have in life. Ungrateful? I'm supremely grateful for what the U.S. offers me. That's why I argue to preserve it--personal freedom, a non-religious state, a positive moral value in the world. If I see policies or decisions made--by anyone, of any party--that contradict these values, I'm going to object.
Bush himself (finally) invited real debate over U.S. policy recently, signalling an end, I guess, to his "if you don't agree with me you must be a traitor" line so far.
Mariner.
Uh, no. The reason the liberals supported the Afghanastan campaign, was because they knew it would be virtually impossible not to. We had just had our twin towers taken down, OBL was there, they were harboring the perps of it. Its not much different than Pearl Harbor. They really had no choice but to support it.
Why do you guys LIE? Bush and the administration werent just sitting on their asses while NK and Iran was developing nukes. What did Clinton do to stop NK? You know, we are quite capable of multi tasking. I mean, we fought a world war not too long ago, pacific , atlantic, european, asian and african theatre all at once.
If you want to feel negative about your own delusional hallucinations that we cant multitask and Iraq prevented us from handling Iran and NK at the same time, thats your problem. By the way, Condalisa Rice is an absolutely BRILLIANT woman, and she could handle all of those situation in between her breakfast and lunch breaks.