Muslims Defend Christians During Attack in Kenya

[Two Thumbs]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

 

[Roudy]

yeah , yeah , yeah !! Course I grew up right after IKES operation 'wetback' . I was born into this country in 1949 and the country was fine until the diversity started , probably in the 80s when I took note . I grew up making good money in good jobs and the country was less crowded and my Moms inauthentic chili , spaghetti and Chinese food was fine and dandy . Things were the same or better for my parents that raised 5 kids in good style with 'perks' and with private doctors and only my Dad worked for money . ---------- anyway Go Trump or Cruz 'Progressive !!

Perhaps we have some things in common. I was born in 1947 in New York City to a mother whose family had recently immigrated from Italy and a father who was first generation Irish/ Hungarian. My community was somewhat diverse-at least religiously- I had Jewish and Christian friends- but was not exposed to other cultures until later. The difference between us is that you seem to be hostile towards and even frightened by diversity. I am not afraid and in fact I embrace it, and quite frankly, I don’t understand what your problem is.

My attitude towards minorities emanates largely from my father’s acceptance of them. One Christmas season, while I was still young, he invited a group of black and Latino coworkers to the house. My mother and others on her Italian side were mortified. They were the racists and the xenophobes but I loved the music and the exposure to this foreign culture. I’m a better person for it.

Every ethnic, racial and religious group to come to this country that has been built on immigration has been met with bigotry and fear. My mother-who was from Sicily and a little on the dark side- was called the N word. Unfortunately, that did not inspire her to be empathetic towards others .but rather hardened to against them

Arabs/Muslims are experiencing that now but will one day be accepted as well. The main difference, as I see it, is the terrorist factor that is being used to demonize them, but let’s not forget that the Italians and to a lesser extent the Irish were derided to their criminal enterprises.

Now, I have a brother-in-law who is Guatemalan, earned his citizenship after coming in undocumented and is a responsible family man and productive member of the community. We are better for the diversity and contributions of people from other countries, cultures and religions. You really need to think more deeply about what it is that you believe in and the implications of what you advocate.

False example. You can't compare Muslims to the previous groups of immigrants. When there are potential terrorist threats among these Muslims, the US just does not have to expose it's people to this risk at this time. Set aside the fact that a big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer shariah law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate. Only a country willing to commit national suicide would let more in without figuring it out first. There needs to be a full and comprehensive discussion as to who we should let in and why. The Obama administration cannot be trusted to carry out what is in the best interest of our nation.

It is a valid example. Other immigrant groups have had their violent traits among some of them. For instance, the Italians brought us the Mafia.

It is you who are relying on a logical fallacy, specifically the red herring of focusing exclusively on the issue of terrorism while ignoring my argument that millions of peaceful Muslims are being treated badly and being blamed for the actions of a few.

You are also guilty of an appeal to ignorance by saying that "big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer sharia law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate." I'm going to call bullshit because you don't know that, you can't know that and you do not specify what those "large numbers" are.

Wow you just hop from one false example to another. None of the immigrant groups i.e. Italians, Chinese, Irish, etc. displayed an intention to slaughter Americans simply because they were Americans, dufus.

And yes, 25% of AMERICAN MUSLIMS support violent jihad against the infidels and 56% support shariah law over the constitution. Want more if this shit in our country? Go right ahead and commit national suicide. By the time you realize what you've done it will be too late, same thing that happened to the Europeans.

Another appeal to ignorance by putting out figures without documentation, but expect people to accept. How many Evangelical Christians want biblical law over the Constitution? My guess is a whole lot mare than the number of Muslims who want Sharia law. You are only concerned about theocracy when it's Islamic Theocracy. You don't give a rats hind parts about the Constitution

Stop guessing and using one false example after another. Evangelicals are part of the fabric of this nation and have proven they can coexist in a democracy. Muslims are immigrants unlike any immigrant clas, who want to establish a shariah shithole, cannot coexist or accept Western values, some of which want to kill Americans just for being Americans. And a vast majority of them are bigots. Why would an sane country want to let more of this shit in?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

Lock the doors, pull the shades, turn out the lights, compromise our values.......message to terrorists: you have won!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Perhaps we have some things in common. I was born in 1947 in New York City to a mother whose family had recently immigrated from Italy and a father who was first generation Irish/ Hungarian. My community was somewhat diverse-at least religiously- I had Jewish and Christian friends- but was not exposed to other cultures until later. The difference between us is that you seem to be hostile towards and even frightened by diversity. I am not afraid and in fact I embrace it, and quite frankly, I don’t understand what your problem is.

My attitude towards minorities emanates largely from my father’s acceptance of them. One Christmas season, while I was still young, he invited a group of black and Latino coworkers to the house. My mother and others on her Italian side were mortified. They were the racists and the xenophobes but I loved the music and the exposure to this foreign culture. I’m a better person for it.

Every ethnic, racial and religious group to come to this country that has been built on immigration has been met with bigotry and fear. My mother-who was from Sicily and a little on the dark side- was called the N word. Unfortunately, that did not inspire her to be empathetic towards others .but rather hardened to against them

Arabs/Muslims are experiencing that now but will one day be accepted as well. The main difference, as I see it, is the terrorist factor that is being used to demonize them, but let’s not forget that the Italians and to a lesser extent the Irish were derided to their criminal enterprises.

Now, I have a brother-in-law who is Guatemalan, earned his citizenship after coming in undocumented and is a responsible family man and productive member of the community. We are better for the diversity and contributions of people from other countries, cultures and religions. You really need to think more deeply about what it is that you believe in and the implications of what you advocate.

False example. You can't compare Muslims to the previous groups of immigrants. When there are potential terrorist threats among these Muslims, the US just does not have to expose it's people to this risk at this time. Set aside the fact that a big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer shariah law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate. Only a country willing to commit national suicide would let more in without figuring it out first. There needs to be a full and comprehensive discussion as to who we should let in and why. The Obama administration cannot be trusted to carry out what is in the best interest of our nation.

It is a valid example. Other immigrant groups have had their violent traits among some of them. For instance, the Italians brought us the Mafia.

It is you who are relying on a logical fallacy, specifically the red herring of focusing exclusively on the issue of terrorism while ignoring my argument that millions of peaceful Muslims are being treated badly and being blamed for the actions of a few.

You are also guilty of an appeal to ignorance by saying that "big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer sharia law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate." I'm going to call bullshit because you don't know that, you can't know that and you do not specify what those "large numbers" are.

Wow you just hop from one false example to another. None of the immigrant groups i.e. Italians, Chinese, Irish, etc. displayed an intention to slaughter Americans simply because they were Americans, dufus.

And yes, 25% of AMERICAN MUSLIMS support violent jihad against the infidels and 56% support shariah law over the constitution. Want more if this shit in our country? Go right ahead and commit national suicide. By the time you realize what you've done it will be too late, same thing that happened to the Europeans.

Another appeal to ignorance by putting out figures without documentation, but expect people to accept. How many Evangelical Christians want biblical law over the Constitution? My guess is a whole lot mare than the number of Muslims who want Sharia law. You are only concerned about theocracy when it's Islamic Theocracy. You don't give a rats hind parts about the Constitution

Stop guessing and using one false example after another. Evangelicals are part of the fabric of this nation and have proven they can coexist in a democracy. Muslims are immigrants unlike any immigrant clas, who want to establish a shariah shithole, cannot coexist or accept Western values, some of which want to kill Americans just for being Americans. And a vast majority of them are bigots. Why would an sane country want to let more of this shit in?

Delusional horseshit! Evangelicals hate what America has become. They have no respect or appreciation for our system of laws and government. There are many more of them who want a theocracy than there are Muslims who want Sharia law, and they are in government and positions of power and influence NOW. A vast majority of THEM are bigots.

 

[Roudy]

False example. You can't compare Muslims to the previous groups of immigrants. When there are potential terrorist threats among these Muslims, the US just does not have to expose it's people to this risk at this time. Set aside the fact that a big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer shariah law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate. Only a country willing to commit national suicide would let more in without figuring it out first. There needs to be a full and comprehensive discussion as to who we should let in and why. The Obama administration cannot be trusted to carry out what is in the best interest of our nation.

It is a valid example. Other immigrant groups have had their violent traits among some of them. For instance, the Italians brought us the Mafia.

It is you who are relying on a logical fallacy, specifically the red herring of focusing exclusively on the issue of terrorism while ignoring my argument that millions of peaceful Muslims are being treated badly and being blamed for the actions of a few.

You are also guilty of an appeal to ignorance by saying that "big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer sharia law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate." I'm going to call bullshit because you don't know that, you can't know that and you do not specify what those "large numbers" are.

Wow you just hop from one false example to another. None of the immigrant groups i.e. Italians, Chinese, Irish, etc. displayed an intention to slaughter Americans simply because they were Americans, dufus.

And yes, 25% of AMERICAN MUSLIMS support violent jihad against the infidels and 56% support shariah law over the constitution. Want more if this shit in our country? Go right ahead and commit national suicide. By the time you realize what you've done it will be too late, same thing that happened to the Europeans.

Another appeal to ignorance by putting out figures without documentation, but expect people to accept. How many Evangelical Christians want biblical law over the Constitution? My guess is a whole lot mare than the number of Muslims who want Sharia law. You are only concerned about theocracy when it's Islamic Theocracy. You don't give a rats hind parts about the Constitution

Stop guessing and using one false example after another. Evangelicals are part of the fabric of this nation and have proven they can coexist in a democracy. Muslims are immigrants unlike any immigrant clas, who want to establish a shariah shithole, cannot coexist or accept Western values, some of which want to kill Americans just for being Americans. And a vast majority of them are bigots. Why would an sane country want to let more of this shit in?

Delusional horseshit! Evangelicals hate what America has become. They have no respect or appreciation for our system of laws and government. There are many more of them who want a theocracy than there are Muslims who want Sharia law, and they are in government and positions of power and influence NOW. A vast majority of THEM are bigots.

I would say that it's the commie leftist whackjobs who have no respect for the values of this country and the constitution, and are constantly trying to "transform" it into a socialist state.

Wow, so now you're comparing evangelicals to Muslim immigrants. Since when was the entire Western world on high alert from evangelical terrorists? Talk about delusional horseshit!

You still have not made the case as to why our country should take this unnecessary risk and let more Muslims in, other than the usual butt butt butt.....

 

[pismoe]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

Lock the doors, pull the shades, turn out the lights, compromise our values.......message to terrorists: you have won!

compromise 'OUR' values , wot , you must have a mouse in your pocket . Point is that there is no way that You and I share any values . Besides that muslims IN the USA can do as they have always done but no new imports of muslims if I and the Trump get our way . And the issue is being discussed and a coupla law professors say that exclusion of muslims can be done. Do I have to repost my law professors opinion again Progressive ??

 

[pismoe]

mrobama does the same thing when he assumes that he shares any values at all with the majority of American people . Heck , no way that we share any values at all Progressive !!

 

[pismoe]

law professors opinion on legality on importing more muslims into the USA . --- Law Professors Drop MASSIVE BOMBSHELL About Trump’s 'Muslim Ban'… This is HUGE --- I repost it again so that any that have not seen it can see it Progressive !!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It is a valid example. Other immigrant groups have had their violent traits among some of them. For instance, the Italians brought us the Mafia.

It is you who are relying on a logical fallacy, specifically the red herring of focusing exclusively on the issue of terrorism while ignoring my argument that millions of peaceful Muslims are being treated badly and being blamed for the actions of a few.

You are also guilty of an appeal to ignorance by saying that "big number of Muslims harbor anti American sentiments and prefer sharia law over the constitution, and are unable to accept the culture and values of this country and coexist or assimilate." I'm going to call bullshit because you don't know that, you can't know that and you do not specify what those "large numbers" are.

Wow you just hop from one false example to another. None of the immigrant groups i.e. Italians, Chinese, Irish, etc. displayed an intention to slaughter Americans simply because they were Americans, dufus.

And yes, 25% of AMERICAN MUSLIMS support violent jihad against the infidels and 56% support shariah law over the constitution. Want more if this shit in our country? Go right ahead and commit national suicide. By the time you realize what you've done it will be too late, same thing that happened to the Europeans.

Another appeal to ignorance by putting out figures without documentation, but expect people to accept. How many Evangelical Christians want biblical law over the Constitution? My guess is a whole lot mare than the number of Muslims who want Sharia law. You are only concerned about theocracy when it's Islamic Theocracy. You don't give a rats hind parts about the Constitution

Stop guessing and using one false example after another. Evangelicals are part of the fabric of this nation and have proven they can coexist in a democracy. Muslims are immigrants unlike any immigrant clas, who want to establish a shariah shithole, cannot coexist or accept Western values, some of which want to kill Americans just for being Americans. And a vast majority of them are bigots. Why would an sane country want to let more of this shit in?

Delusional horseshit! Evangelicals hate what America has become. They have no respect or appreciation for our system of laws and government. There are many more of them who want a theocracy than there are Muslims who want Sharia law, and they are in government and positions of power and influence NOW. A vast majority of THEM are bigots.

I would say that it's the commie leftist whackjobs who have no respect for the values of this country and the constitution, and are constantly trying to "transform" it into a socialist state.

Wow, so now you're comparing evangelicals to Muslim immigrants. Since when was the entire Western world on high alert from evangelical terrorists? Talk about delusional horseshit!

You still have not made the case as to why our country should take this unnecessary risk and let more Muslims in, other than the usual butt butt butt.....

You are clearly spiraling downward into a pit of incoherent inanity. Commies? Socialist? Just keep throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. Evangelicals post a real and present danger our democracy and to the Constitution. Muslims and Islam is not the problem... extremist jihadists are. We are a nation of immigrants and have a tradition of inclusion .

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

Lock the doors, pull the shades, turn out the lights, compromise our values.......message to terrorists: you have won!

compromise 'OUR' values , wot , you must have a mouse in your pocket . Point is that there is no way that You and I share any values . Besides that muslims IN the USA can do as they have always done but no new imports of muslims if I and the Trump get our way . And the issue is being discussed and a coupla law professors say that exclusion of muslims can be done. Do I have to repost my law professors opinion again Progressive ??

I suppose that you right about that much...there is no way that You and I share any values . Nor do you share the values of the vast majority of decent Americans. Screw your couple of outlier law professors . TWO right wing law professors. Why are they right and everyone one else wrong?

 

[pismoe]

Progressive has ALL the liberal , progressive talking point and that's for sure !!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Progressive has ALL the liberal , progressive talking point and that's for sure !!

Why Donald Trump Can’t Ban Muslims
Posted on December 8, 2015December 8, 2015 by rahmannoodlesoup
Donald Trump’s most recent political statement has, once again, fired up the entire nation. He is calling for a “total and complete” shutdown of Muslims entering the country. He thinks that America shouldn’t let in any Muslims—not even tourists.

Okay, now let me tell you all about why this is unrealistic and unintelligent. Why Donald Trump Can't Ban Muslims

 

[Roudy]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

Lock the doors, pull the shades, turn out the lights, compromise our values.......message to terrorists: you have won!

compromise 'OUR' values , wot , you must have a mouse in your pocket . Point is that there is no way that You and I share any values . Besides that muslims IN the USA can do as they have always done but no new imports of muslims if I and the Trump get our way . And the issue is being discussed and a coupla law professors say that exclusion of muslims can be done. Do I have to repost my law professors opinion again Progressive ??

I suppose that you right about that much...there is no way that You and I share any values . Nor do you share the values of the vast majority of decent Americans. Screw your couple of outlier law professors . TWO right wing law professors. Why are they right and everyone one else wrong?

Well, here is a left wing paper saying that Donald Trump is right.

Donald Trump's proposed ban on Muslim immigrants could be legal, scholars say

You lose.

 

[Roudy]

Donald Trump's proposed ban on Muslim immigrants could be legal, scholars say

Donald Trump's attention-getting proposal for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” struck many as blatantly unconstitutional because it discriminates against a class of people based on religion and punishes even those who have done nothing wrong.

When applied to Americans, such a policy would almost certainly violate constitutional guarantees of “due process of law” and “equal protection.”

But legal scholars note that immigration law is different, and Trump’s ban, however controversial, could actually pass legal muster.

Federal law and the courts have long given Congress and the president nearly unchecked power to bar foreigners from entering the country.


“Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he deems necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens,” according to the federal Immigration and Nationality Act.

Moreover, non-citizens who live outside the U.S. usually cannot invoke rights protected by the Constitution.

After the initial public uproar, Trump quickly clarified that he did not mean to include U.S. citizens in the ban and was referring only to foreigners.

For its part, the Supreme Court throughout history has steadily upheld the federal government's so-called “plenary power” over immigration.

In 1889, for example, the justices upheld the Chinese Exclusion Act, which kept out Chinese laborers and declared that the “power of exclusion of foreigners” was a “part of the sovereign powers delegated to” the federal government. That decision remains on the books.

In June of this year, the high court upheld the State Department's decision to deny a visa to the Afghan husband of a California woman. Fauzia Din, a U.S. citizen living in Fremont, was asking the court to require immigration officials to give a better explanation for why her husband’s visa was denied, but Justice Anthony Kennedy in a concurring opinion cited the government's plenary or complete power to exclude immigrants and said the government’s reference to an anti-terrorism statue was sufficient.

University of Chicago Law Professor Eric Posner said the “plenary power” doctrine is viewed with contempt by many lawyers, but because of legal precedents it has set, civil libertarians would face an uphill fight if they challenged a broad immigration ban in the Supreme Court.

“If you take seriously the cases that have been decided in the past, they would find it constitutional,” he said of a Trump-like ban on Muslims. Though past restrictions have been based on race, nationality or political beliefs — not religion — Posner said he did not see that distinction as crucial.

“As a matter of law, I don't see why it should matter,” he said. “If someone can be excluded from this country merely for having the wrong political beliefs, he could be excluded for having the wrong religious beliefs.”

 

[pismoe]

didn't read your propaganda but 'unintelligent' and 'unrealistic' does not mean ILLEGAL !! Both unintelligent and unrealistic are simply a matter of opinion Progressive .

 

[Roudy]

And here's the leader of left wing whackjob news, non other than PMSNBC saying that Trump's ban could be legal.

Legal scholar: Trump's Muslim ban is probably legal

 

[Two Thumbs]

What the hell were those those Muslims thinking? Protecting Christians from al-Shabab? Don't they know that they were supposed to join al-Shabab in it's quest to kill Christians? I bet they did it, just so they could come to the US and become citizens.
==============================================================================
Muslim passengers defended Christian passengers during an extremist attack on a bus in Kenya on Monday.
Members of the al-Shabab militant organization shot at a bus in Mandera, Kenya, forcing it to stop. Once the militants boarded the bus, they attempted to separate Muslim and Christian passengers, intending to kill the Christians on board, the BBC reported.
“We even gave some non-Muslims our religious attire to wear in the bus so that they would not be identified easily. We stuck together tightly," Abdi Mohamud Abdi, a Muslim passenger, told Reuters . "The militants threatened to shoot us but we still refused and protected our brothers and sisters. Finally they gave up and left but warned that they would be back.”
http://www.newsweek.com/muslims-defend-christians-during-al-shabab-militant-attack-kenya-407859

So one time, once, in generations, muslims stick with their christian neighbors.

damn, we should let them all in, then everything will be great

or not


well, mostly not

Lock the doors, pull the shades, turn out the lights, compromise our values.......message to terrorists: you have won!

the irony of your post is some of the best irony ever.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Any leftist saying we can't stop anyone from coming in is a hypocrite, b/c they ALL LOVE fdr and that evil fuck put innocent men, women and children BABIES, in prison camps

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

And here's the leader of left wing whackjob news, non other than PMSNBC saying that Trump's ban could be legal.

Legal scholar: Trump's Muslim ban is probably legal

Ill you what. I will concede that there may be a legal basis for it. However, it still makes no sense, is morally repugnant, keep us safe and in fact will be counter productive. The Muslim bashing has got to stop! Allah Akbar

 

[pismoe]

I'm not worried about safety at all , I'll take care of myself . I just want to see exclusion of muslims due to the fact that everything about 'islam' is incompatible with America and the WESTERN way of life .