Muslim sets fire on Catholic university campus

[Baz Ares]

All Religions are about killing the other religions.
This all started before the then, original 1%ers Templar's
really ramped up the Whitey Wars of Murder of others
in this world. To take their lands and money.
For themselves, claiming they were doing the lords work on the poor.

Left wing fag, making excuses for Islam at every chance.

Keep it up. It’s folks like you that get people like President Trump elected.

And how did I make an excuse for just one religion, clearly here?
Facts, are just Facts.
They excuse nothang. But the older ones are more reasonable
for running ignorant hate training schools, first.

 

[MaryL]

Don't care. Muslims aren't too concerned about western christian backlash, so when and if Muslims ever are, I will urge the same in the West.

 

[Preacher]

Precisely why we should not be importing the savages!

We should deport our southern red states of religious whites. For public safety.

We tried to leave...we were FORCIBLY kept in the union at gun point...got no one to blame but the federal government its self.

They were never forced to stay here, ever.
They were offered pardons for their crimes after losing
to their betters, Real, always Patriotic, Americans.
Many took these pardons, admitting their treasonous
serious crimes again U.S.A. Now red states survive
on federal gobmint handouts and welfare.

I think their problems started long ago with inbreeding
among defective whitey family members learned from
their rewritten over 23 times at least, bibles.

Only reason "red states" need government handouts is because of the HIGH amount of negro's and mexicans that reside in them suckling off our system. Your anti white racism is noted though.

Yes, I'm fully anti-Whitey of all WN, Nazi, Alt-Righties, KKK and some RW'er types...etc.
Did I miss any in the pure whites only party of whitey GOP/DOPers Racist morons in their
sub-groups in their mostly white only collective? To win elections?

Rational White folks, are 98% okay. You do find some unworthy ones
from time to time among these white folks..

You do know, I'm 100% American Born White, always living in an inclusive
rational majority white states.
.

Nope, you hate anyone who say's or thinks its OK to be white. PERIOD.

 

[Baz Ares]

Don't care. Muslims aren't too concerned about western christian backlash, so when and if Muslims ever are, I will urge the same in the West.

From your view point alone, as a practicing devotee of a religion?
Judging other religions. Or a mix of practiced religions, as you
transferred through these others religions available, finding a better
loving lord'? Or did you make up your own personal religion?

 

[Baz Ares]

We should deport our southern red states of religious whites. For public safety.

We tried to leave...we were FORCIBLY kept in the union at gun point...got no one to blame but the federal government its self.

They were never forced to stay here, ever.
They were offered pardons for their crimes after losing
to their betters, Real, always Patriotic, Americans.
Many took these pardons, admitting their treasonous
serious crimes again U.S.A. Now red states survive
on federal gobmint handouts and welfare.

I think their problems started long ago with inbreeding
among defective whitey family members learned from
their rewritten over 23 times at least, bibles.

Only reason "red states" need government handouts is because of the HIGH amount of negro's and mexicans that reside in them suckling off our system. Your anti white racism is noted though.

Yes, I'm fully anti-Whitey of all WN, Nazi, Alt-Righties, KKK and some RW'er types...etc.
Did I miss any in the pure whites only party of whitey GOP/DOPers Racist morons in their
sub-groups in their mostly white only collective? To win elections?

Rational White folks, are 98% okay. You do find some unworthy ones
from time to time among these white folks..

You do know, I'm 100% American Born White, always living in an inclusive
rational majority white states.
.

Nope, you hate anyone who say's or thinks its OK to be white. PERIOD.

We should deport our southern red states of religious whites. For public safety.

We tried to leave...we were FORCIBLY kept in the union at gun point...got no one to blame but the federal government its self.

They were never forced to stay here, ever.
They were offered pardons for their crimes after losing
to their betters, Real, always Patriotic, Americans.
Many took these pardons, admitting their treasonous
serious crimes again U.S.A. Now red states survive
on federal gobmint handouts and welfare.

I think their problems started long ago with inbreeding
among defective whitey family members learned from
their rewritten over 23 times at least, bibles.

Only reason "red states" need government handouts is because of the HIGH amount of negro's and mexicans that reside in them suckling off our system. Your anti white racism is noted though.

Yes, I'm fully anti-Whitey of all WN, Nazi, Alt-Righties, KKK and some RW'er types...etc.
Did I miss any in the pure whites only party of whitey GOP/DOPers Racist morons in their
sub-groups in their mostly white only collective? To win elections?

Rational White folks, are 98% okay. You do find some unworthy ones
from time to time among these white folks..

You do know, I'm 100% American Born White, always living in an inclusive
rational majority white states.
.

Nope, you hate anyone who say's or thinks its OK to be white. PERIOD.

Please..... Clearly, I've never said such a thang! Please show where I said so in your
assumed and false claim. I know it's hard for you as a DOPer. But try, with some self-
respect, you are an embarrassment to our/the white race.

 

[harmonica]

Leave it to BA to try and deflect instead of saying anything worthwhile.

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

 

[Baz Ares]

Leave it to BA to try and deflect instead of saying anything worthwhile.

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

 

[harmonica]

Leave it to BA to try and deflect instead of saying anything worthwhile.

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

 

[MaryL]

Muslims are always beheading, crashing planes into buildings, pretty much anti-western freedom horrifying acts. I am agnostic, Islam creeps me out far more than anything Christians have done lately. We question stuff, Islam taxes and actually kills people in the here and now .

 

[Baz Ares]

Leave it to BA to try and deflect instead of saying anything worthwhile.

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

 

[Baron]

Muslims are enemies within.Plain and simple. Any mosques is a military staff in the war against white christian man.

 

[Baron]

Muslims are always beheading, crashing planes into buildings, pretty much anti-western freedom horrifying acts. I am agnostic, Islam creeps me out far more than anything Christians have done lately. We question stuff, Islam taxes and actually kills people in the here and now .

Question: why liberals import this rubbish?

 

[harmonica]

Leave it to BA to try and deflect instead of saying anything worthwhile.

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

 

[Baz Ares]

Did I say somthang untrue? As to why she has her right' to fight whomever she chooses.
I was just pointing out what religion is to blame for all this today.

As a taxpayer, the usa drops bombs all over the world on my behalf.
Mostly on children and mothers.

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

btw: There are so many to choose from.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

 

[harmonica]

ok --right there you are full of crap--the US does not directly target civilians like the muslims/islamics/etc do
so we can't take you seriously when you post obvious crap
if you keep that up--we just laugh at your posts
if you want to discuss seriously, stop the crap

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

 

[Baz Ares]

Hmm? So you mean during WWII and Vietnam.
The US armed forces did not Carpet Bomb Vast
areas of civilians? Some put the counts at
over 2 million killed and/or wounded. I recall we drop
nukes on two cities in japan, mostly Women and Children.
WOW! What a score.


As you were saying? Please explain our purity polices on who
we don't attack and kill again.

btw: We have attacked killed/wounded some 135K in civilians
in both Iraq and Afghan areas. Just from 1994 on. DANG!

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense

the usa drops bombs

however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base

attack against an oil tank

railroad switching yards

etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

The targets of the first wave of bombers were the North Vietnamese airfields

warehouse complex

. Their targets included the Kinh No Railroad and storage area, the Thái Nguyên thermal power plant, and the Yên Viên complex

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc

Through much of World War II, Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of impending bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender.

Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

During our attacks on Japan. Which were approved by Congress as Legal WAR.
The USA did commit Wars Crimes on Japan, as they did on us.

We have no current war declarations now. Just Terror programs.
We drone strike whoever we feel in some areas
with some nations approval, or not. But ALL are still, US Terrorism done
by the US. Labeling all attacks as Muslim/Islam is mostly
inaccurate. To be fair, These are not nations attacking us, just
small groups, of morons hating there betters. Like our American
WN, KKK, types. At this time our American Crazy insane Terrorist
groups are not as active as the so-called fake claiming being Muslin
one are. Some are, doing it for Islam, in the scale of attacks and why..
Most are not.

btw: Again. People must die, to have goodly done terrorism.
The winners get to cover up their Crimes later.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

 

[harmonica]

as a general policy, the US does not target civilians


we are talking post WW2
your quote is present tense however:
Vietnam they were not targeting civilians
etc
Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia

etc etc
Operation Linebacker II - Wikipedia


WW2 is entirely different
the Atomic bombs were necessary and actually saved more lives than if the US had to invade
etc etc


Warning Leaflets
the Japanese/Germans bombed cities/killed civilians FIRST!!
...we were totally justified in bombing cities in WW2

big freakin difference--the muslims/islamics do NOT send out leaflets before a bombing !!!!!!!!!!

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

During our attacks on Japan. Which were approved by Congress as Legal WAR.
The USA did commit Wars Crimes on Japan, as they did on us.

We have no current war declarations now. Just Terror programs.
We drone strike whoever we feel in some areas
with some nations approval, or not. But ALL are still, US Terrorism done
by the US. Labeling all attacks as Muslim/Islam is mostly
inaccurate. To be fair, These are not nations attacking us, just
small groups, of morons hating there betters. Like our American
WN, KKK, types. At this time our American Crazy insane Terrorist
groups are not as active as the so-called fake claiming being Muslin
one are. Some are, doing it for Islam, in the scale of attacks and why..
Most are not.

btw: Again. People must die, to have goodly done terrorism.
The winners get to cover up their Crimes later.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

what were the war crimes the US committed on Japan??

 

[Baz Ares]

So, you've gone from "the US does not directly target civilians"
To "Generally" we will, when required. CHECK!

I hope our USA Drone Strike Murders are not so picky on killing civilians.
We know they are playing a video game. And don't realize the different.
As they freely bomb mom and the kids. On their next cowardly flyover.
On areas of the world where we have no declarations of war on them,
from/by our congress.

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

During our attacks on Japan. Which were approved by Congress as Legal WAR.
The USA did commit Wars Crimes on Japan, as they did on us.

We have no current war declarations now. Just Terror programs.
We drone strike whoever we feel in some areas
with some nations approval, or not. But ALL are still, US Terrorism done
by the US. Labeling all attacks as Muslim/Islam is mostly
inaccurate. To be fair, These are not nations attacking us, just
small groups, of morons hating there betters. Like our American
WN, KKK, types. At this time our American Crazy insane Terrorist
groups are not as active as the so-called fake claiming being Muslin
one are. Some are, doing it for Islam, in the scale of attacks and why..
Most are not.

btw: Again. People must die, to have goodly done terrorism.
The winners get to cover up their Crimes later.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

what were the war crimes the US committed on Japan??

Airstrikes from China on Japanese soldiers and civilians before Dec 45.
And the big ones,.using Nukes. Claiming it saved American lives, when
we had the island block from almost all imports by sea.

 

[harmonica]

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

During our attacks on Japan. Which were approved by Congress as Legal WAR.
The USA did commit Wars Crimes on Japan, as they did on us.

We have no current war declarations now. Just Terror programs.
We drone strike whoever we feel in some areas
with some nations approval, or not. But ALL are still, US Terrorism done
by the US. Labeling all attacks as Muslim/Islam is mostly
inaccurate. To be fair, These are not nations attacking us, just
small groups, of morons hating there betters. Like our American
WN, KKK, types. At this time our American Crazy insane Terrorist
groups are not as active as the so-called fake claiming being Muslin
one are. Some are, doing it for Islam, in the scale of attacks and why..
Most are not.

btw: Again. People must die, to have goodly done terrorism.
The winners get to cover up their Crimes later.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

what were the war crimes the US committed on Japan??

Airstrikes from China on Japanese soldiers and civilians before Dec 45.
And the big ones,.using Nukes. Claiming it saved American lives, when
we had the island block from almost all imports by sea.

the Japanese forced us is the bombs--they were not surrendering

 

[harmonica]

you cannot deny the US military do not target civilians like terrorists do
you are wrong--I'll state it again--the US does not directly target civilians--please prove otherwise

in WW2 the Japanese were given many chances to surrender--and they didn't
there were still some that didn't want to surrender AFTER the A-bombs!!! !
it was totally necessary, legal, correct to use the Abombs
this is totally different than the terrorists actions

again, the US does not directly target civilians--present tense [ even going back to Vietnam ] as a general policy
there will always be rogue serviceman that will kill civilians and ALWAYS mistakes/friendly fire/etc

but it is not US policy to kill civilians--as it IS the terrorists policy--there is a huge difference...you can't deny this

All wars are crimes.
All attacks done to kill peoples, is Terrorism.
You seem to require the game is played Tastefully? With Rules?

so it was a crime for the US to go to war with Japan?? !!??

there have always been and always will be wars

During our attacks on Japan. Which were approved by Congress as Legal WAR.
The USA did commit Wars Crimes on Japan, as they did on us.

We have no current war declarations now. Just Terror programs.
We drone strike whoever we feel in some areas
with some nations approval, or not. But ALL are still, US Terrorism done
by the US. Labeling all attacks as Muslim/Islam is mostly
inaccurate. To be fair, These are not nations attacking us, just
small groups, of morons hating there betters. Like our American
WN, KKK, types. At this time our American Crazy insane Terrorist
groups are not as active as the so-called fake claiming being Muslin
one are. Some are, doing it for Islam, in the scale of attacks and why..
Most are not.

btw: Again. People must die, to have goodly done terrorism.
The winners get to cover up their Crimes later.

No Gun Ri massacre - Wikipedia

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship

what were the war crimes the US committed on Japan??

Airstrikes from China on Japanese soldiers and civilians before Dec 45.
And the big ones,.using Nukes. Claiming it saved American lives, when
we had the island block from almost all imports by sea.

blocking--you mean blockading -- you must not know much--they were NOT surrendering
the blockade was not making them surrender