- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
Liberals have made it a consistent practice to align themselves with minority groups of all sorts. In so doing, they add on voting blocs to empower themselves politically.
What we as conservatives should do is be aware of everything we must do to defend ourselves from harm. If this includes entire ethnic groups, then we should denounce those groups as harmful, and cite specifically how this is the case.
During World War II, we would not have allowed Japanese or Germans to immigrate to America. Likewise, we now must at least define and determine whatever is a danger to us, and if that includes an ethnic group, then so be it. Out top priority is national security, and the protection of the American people is out govt's # 1 responsibility, not extending welcomes to anyone from anywhere, however threatening they may be.
Although many people who describe themselves as Muslims are truly loyal Americans, it cannot be denied that the doctrine (the Koran) that Islam is defined by is supremacist (and thus unconstitutional), seditious Ian thus illegal), and contains scores of violations of US laws, including many advocating (if not commanding) Muslims to kill all of us who are not Muslims.
Thus, it is conclusive that by allowing Islam to exist in our country, and to allow Muslims to immigrate here is nothing less than self-destruction, and a dereliction of duty of government to protect its people. This has already been shown to be the case with a list of terrorist attacks from the 1993 World Trade Center, to attacks occuring here in 2017.
In their zeal to accumulate votes, liberals cast aside even the all-important matter of national security. Religion is the weapon liberals use, and it's notation in the Constitution's 1st amendment, as in the recent attack on President Trump's immigration/travel ban, by liberal, west coast judges. Those judgements however, were the obvious case of judicial activism, with reckless disregard for public safety. Not one did these rogue judges even mention the 1952 law that gives the POTUS complete jurisdiction over matters of immigration.
And if these phony judges really were so concerned about religion or the Constitution, they could/should/would have referred to Article 6, Section 2, part 1, the Supremacy Clause, which declares Islam, with its supremacist Islamic law, illegal in America. This would be grounds for not only the exclusion of Muslim immigration, it would be grounds for the abolition of Islam in America, entirely. No mosques, no Korans, no footwashing basins, etc, etc.
As for the liberals' religious angle, the Constitution's 1st amendment (loaded with exceptions) cannot trump the Constitution's Supremacy Clause (which has never had a single exception in 225 years). The fact is, nothing can trump the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, including religion (if Islam is even to be defined as a religion - which some nations do not recognize it to be one - Ex. Italy).
What we as conservatives should do is be aware of everything we must do to defend ourselves from harm. If this includes entire ethnic groups, then we should denounce those groups as harmful, and cite specifically how this is the case.
During World War II, we would not have allowed Japanese or Germans to immigrate to America. Likewise, we now must at least define and determine whatever is a danger to us, and if that includes an ethnic group, then so be it. Out top priority is national security, and the protection of the American people is out govt's # 1 responsibility, not extending welcomes to anyone from anywhere, however threatening they may be.
Although many people who describe themselves as Muslims are truly loyal Americans, it cannot be denied that the doctrine (the Koran) that Islam is defined by is supremacist (and thus unconstitutional), seditious Ian thus illegal), and contains scores of violations of US laws, including many advocating (if not commanding) Muslims to kill all of us who are not Muslims.
Thus, it is conclusive that by allowing Islam to exist in our country, and to allow Muslims to immigrate here is nothing less than self-destruction, and a dereliction of duty of government to protect its people. This has already been shown to be the case with a list of terrorist attacks from the 1993 World Trade Center, to attacks occuring here in 2017.
In their zeal to accumulate votes, liberals cast aside even the all-important matter of national security. Religion is the weapon liberals use, and it's notation in the Constitution's 1st amendment, as in the recent attack on President Trump's immigration/travel ban, by liberal, west coast judges. Those judgements however, were the obvious case of judicial activism, with reckless disregard for public safety. Not one did these rogue judges even mention the 1952 law that gives the POTUS complete jurisdiction over matters of immigration.
And if these phony judges really were so concerned about religion or the Constitution, they could/should/would have referred to Article 6, Section 2, part 1, the Supremacy Clause, which declares Islam, with its supremacist Islamic law, illegal in America. This would be grounds for not only the exclusion of Muslim immigration, it would be grounds for the abolition of Islam in America, entirely. No mosques, no Korans, no footwashing basins, etc, etc.
As for the liberals' religious angle, the Constitution's 1st amendment (loaded with exceptions) cannot trump the Constitution's Supremacy Clause (which has never had a single exception in 225 years). The fact is, nothing can trump the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, including religion (if Islam is even to be defined as a religion - which some nations do not recognize it to be one - Ex. Italy).
