Mueller report to be released Thursday

That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.
This is the actual last paragraph before the appendices.
View attachment 257300
In other words, Mueller had nothing to say about obstruction of Justice, but he did earlier say there were not grounds for concluding there was any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, effectively stating there were never any legitimate grounds for the investigation in the first place.
 
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.
You moron, he hasn't been officially accused of anything so he can't be declared innocent of something he hasn't been accused of.
He can't be accused of anything unless he's impeached.
An impeachment is a formal accusation (indictment), you moron.
 
Do you not remember Mueller's statement about recommending NO NEW INDICTMENTS?

1. Two people were indicted since that was said: Assange and Gregory Craig.

2. Mueller could not indict Trump untill the Congress convicts him.


You just cling to your fantasy Comrade.

Then on Thursday you go full hair on fire and say that the report would prove Trump guilty of something, because reasons, if not for the redaction....

lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.

Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.

Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.
 
Barr has already declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing

What would Trump have to fear about a 400 page report?
I’m sure it will be a glowing endorsement of his presidency


Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

There was evidence which could support both sides of the argument, which is why Mueller specifically did NOT make a prosecutorial recommendation either way.

And the last time I checked, communicating with people who aren't Americans isn't illegal.
 
Barr has already declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing

What would Trump have to fear about a 400 page report?
I’m sure it will be a glowing endorsement of his presidency


Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.


So, as suspected the hate sites have programmed the drones with this as the line of idiocy to spew.

First off, you are a liar - whether you have enough intelligence to formulate a lie or are just reciting a script from the hate sites is irrelevant.


The Office considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy, either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law, including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts
, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371's offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924)

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5955997-Muellerreport


(P. 189)


So comrade, what does this mean?

" traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution"

Did Torquemada initiate prosecution?

Do you gutter scum Communists REALLY think you can lie this into collusion, when it DIRECTLY states no such act occurred?
 
Barr has already declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing

What would Trump have to fear about a 400 page report?
I’m sure it will be a glowing endorsement of his presidency


Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.


The way you do?

What was that fucking lie you told {There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials}

That directly contradicts the Mueller report, but the hate sites put it in a talking point, so you mindlessly repeat it.
 
Barr has already declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing

What would Trump have to fear about a 400 page report?
I’m sure it will be a glowing endorsement of his presidency


Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.


He's flat out lying, but do you think the hive allows him enough thought that he even knows he is lying? :dunno:
 
Barr has already declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing

What would Trump have to fear about a 400 page report?
I’m sure it will be a glowing endorsement of his presidency


Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.

You'd be the expert on THAT.
 
Mueller declared Trump innocent of any wrong doing, asshole.
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.


You're a fucking liar.

The investigation did not, however, yield evidence sufficient to sustain any charge that any
individual affiliated with the Trump Campaign acted as an agent of a foreign principal within the
meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government
of Russia, or any official thereof. In particular, the Office did not and evidence likely to prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafott, George Papadopoulos,
and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian Government or at its direction, control, or
request during the relevant time period. - P. 191
 
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.
You moron, he hasn't been officially accused of anything so he can't be declared innocent of something he hasn't been accused of.
He can't be accused of anything unless he's impeached.

Um, by definition, he has to be accused of something to BE impeached.

I'm thinking you're not clear on the concept here.
 
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.
You moron, he hasn't been officially accused of anything so he can't be declared innocent of something he hasn't been accused of.
No liberals need God to declare “He did nothing wrong” even though he was never charged with doing any wrong. All this has been is a buzzing, distracting fly swarm that the libbies promised when he won.

Puhleeze. Even if God Almighty DID declare that Trump did nothing wrong, leftists would just scoff and say, "Well, I don't believe in God, so TTTTRRRRUMMMMPPPP IS GUILTY!!!!"
 
That's not what the Mueller report says, but it was within its scope.

As per Justice Dept. guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted, so the scope was to either:
1. Declare Trump completely innocent, or
2. Put forward evidence that Trump cannot be declared innocent.

There was evidence of obstruction of justice as well as detailed information of communication between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
Bullshit. The report cleared the Trump campaign of collusion and did not find grounds to claim obstruction of justice took place. The problem the Democrats have is that they have nothing at all to offer to the American people other than lies about the President, so these phony investigations will go on and on and on simploy because the Democrats have nothing else to do.
If you don't read it and go by stuff people make up.
Give it up, you are posting bullshit.
You are posting bs about the Mueller report, what you say is not in there. Its conclusion is that Trump cannot be declared innocent.
This is the actual last paragraph before the appendices.
View attachment 257300


Yes, the stink bomb in Vol. 2, which you got from the hate site,

But then Torquemada pointed out that HE is violating precedent and law.

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to
initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial
judgment.

Really? The sleazy Scofflaw determined NOT to follow the law?

What a scumbag.

Of course he has NO POWER to violate the law, so he throws stink bombs, as it is ALL he can do. IF he had any ability to levy charges, so would he have.
 
1. Two people were indicted since that was said: Assange and Gregory Craig.

2. Mueller could not indict Trump untill the Congress convicts him.


You just cling to your fantasy Comrade.

Then on Thursday you go full hair on fire and say that the report would prove Trump guilty of something, because reasons, if not for the redaction....

lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.

Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.

Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.

lol i love how indignantly you are talking out of your ass.

Ignoramus, impeachment is not a criminal prosecution, it's a process of removing a president out of office. As per DOJ guidelines a sitting president CAN'T be indicted.
 
You just cling to your fantasy Comrade.

Then on Thursday you go full hair on fire and say that the report would prove Trump guilty of something, because reasons, if not for the redaction....

lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.

Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.

Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.

lol i love how indignantly you are talking out of your ass.

Ignoramus, impeachment process is not a criminal prosecution, it's a process of removing a president out office. As per DOJ guidelines a sitting president CAN'T be indicted.


Well good luck with that Comrade.

It's better than the outright treason of the attempted coup you filthy fucks pulled....
 
lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.

Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.

Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.

lol i love how indignantly you are talking out of your ass.

Ignoramus, impeachment process is not a criminal prosecution, it's a process of removing a president out office. As per DOJ guidelines a sitting president CAN'T be indicted.


Well good luck with that Comrade.

It's better than the outright treason of the attempted coup you filthy fucks pulled....

Nothing to do with luck, these are the facts whether or not congress will actually elect to impeach.
 
Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.

lol i love how indignantly you are talking out of your ass.

Ignoramus, impeachment process is not a criminal prosecution, it's a process of removing a president out office. As per DOJ guidelines a sitting president CAN'T be indicted.


Well good luck with that Comrade.

It's better than the outright treason of the attempted coup you filthy fucks pulled....

Nothing to do with luck, these are the facts whether or not congress will actually elect to impeach.


So, you are PUBLICLY stating that the fascists in congress will past an impeachment of the President? I don't mean spew slander and libel, I mean actually PASS an impeachment bill?

Want to place a wager on it? Come on comrade, a traitor like you must be confident in the bullshit from the hate sites that control you....
 
You just cling to your fantasy Comrade.

Then on Thursday you go full hair on fire and say that the report would prove Trump guilty of something, because reasons, if not for the redaction....

lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.

Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.

Yep, facts and truth don't matter to you Stalinist piles of shit. Party is all that matters/

So fuckwad, Trump is exonerated. Will you be apologizing to the forum for your filthy lies? Will you apologize to the president?

Nah, you're too much of a fucking piece of shit for that.

Wow you seriously wouldn't know reality if it hit you upside the head.

Report VERY SPECIFICALLY talks about Trump NOT being exonorated on obstruction and leaves that determination to congress. Barr's memo also explicitly states that the report does not exonorate Trump.

t_33407072b85e4d449f4420a8f23007e9_name_file_1280x720_2000_v3_1_.jpg


Please get a clue before opening your mouth.

The report does NOT leave it to Congress, because Congress does NOT decide about criminal prosecutions. How many fucking times do you screwheads have to have this explained to you?

And however much you fap nightly to the phrase "does not exonerate", you need to face sad reality that it does not INDICT, either. In a country where one is presumed innocent, "do not have enough evidence to prosecute" works just fine.

lol i love how indignantly you are talking out of your ass.

Ignoramus, impeachment is not a criminal prosecution, it's a process of removing a president out of office. As per DOJ guidelines a sitting president CAN'T be indicted.

"LOL" I love how ignorantly you are talking out of YOUR ass. Oh, wait, I don't, because it annoys me that fools like you are allowed to vote just as if you were real people.

Who said impeachment WAS a criminal prosecution? That was actually my point, moron. Congress can decide to impeach; they DON'T decide whether or not crimes are prosecuted, and Mueller was investigating possible crimes. Whether or not the DOJ prefers to wait on prosecuting them until after the President leaves office is irrelevant to what Mueller was investigating, who he worked for, and who he was obligated to report his findings to.

Thanks for arrogantly explaining "the facts", and thus demonstrating just how little you know about what's going on, imbecile.
 

Forum List

Back
Top