/----/ Well thank you. That's all I asked for. And when you read the article you'll see this tidbit:Indictments always originate from the grand jury. Its standard operating procedure. Read the story. It says grand jury "lodged" the indictments, and Mueller "obtained" them./——/ There is no Grand Jury involved in the Muller indictment. Where did you get that from?The indictment comes from a grand jury."If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.
It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
Apparently, you need grand jury 101 lesson.
New York Times: WASHINGTON — The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers on Friday in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign. The indictment came only three days before President Trump was planning to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Helsinki, Finland.
If the special counsel were able to unilaterally issue indictments, we'd be in serious shit due to total breakdown of law & order.
The indictment does not accuse any American citizen of committing a crime, nor does it allege that that the conspiracy either "altered the vote count or changed any election result."