daveman
Diamond Member
It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
Yea i guess so. Funny but also pretty pathetic.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
Yea i guess so. Funny but also pretty pathetic.
It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
im pretty you wont find this anywhere on this threat except your post. but anyways, then by your logic, does that mean if Bush did it it was good? starting 2 wars wasnt the best idea, turing a surplus in a deficit probably wasnt a good idea, deregulating wall street wasnt a good idea, torture definitely wasnt a good idea. but then again, he created the department of homeland security which was a good move, his policies also aliented us from many of our allies across the world.
Bush had his accomplishment and his failures as does Obama.
if you wanna want to make changs, offer up solutions instead of complaining.
Swing and a miss.It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
im pretty you wont find this anywhere on this threat except your post. but anyways, then by your logic, does that mean if Bush did it it was good? starting 2 wars wasnt the best idea, turing a surplus in a deficit probably wasnt a good idea, deregulating wall street wasnt a good idea, torture definitely wasnt a good idea. but then again, he created the department of homeland security which was a good move, his policies also aliented us from many of our allies across the world.
Bush had his accomplishment and his failures as does Obama.
if you wanna want to make changs, offer up solutions instead of complaining.
Swing and a miss.It's really quite simple:
If Bush did it, it's bad.
If Obama does the same thing, it's good.
im pretty you wont find this anywhere on this threat except your post. but anyways, then by your logic, does that mean if Bush did it it was good? starting 2 wars wasnt the best idea, turing a surplus in a deficit probably wasnt a good idea, deregulating wall street wasnt a good idea, torture definitely wasnt a good idea. but then again, he created the department of homeland security which was a good move, his policies also aliented us from many of our allies across the world.
Bush had his accomplishment and his failures as does Obama.
if you wanna want to make changs, offer up solutions instead of complaining.
Of course Obamabots will excuse him anything...including things they condemned Bush for.
Bush raising the deficit? Horrible. Obama raising the deficit? Had to be done.
Bush surging in Iraq? War crime. Obama surging in Afghanistan? Had to be done.
Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Ahh the good ole days for the Hopey Changey nuts. Remember when their Hopey Changey One used to pretend he was against Signing Statements,Recess Appointments,and Raising Debt. Limits? Yikes! Hope & Change = Empty Slogans for Empty Heads.
Can you offer an solutions to these problems other than just partisan rhetoric?
No recess appointments -
effect - no leadership in certain departments
cause - GOP not wanting to confirm
solutions - GOP has hearings and either confirms or rejects
current state - GOP is not having hearings on this matter and thus Obama does a temporary recess appointment so a department has leadership to help it operate
can you offer up any real solutions to this?
Raising the Debt Ceiling -
responsibility - congress, not the president
why it is necessary - to keep government running, to not default in the US debt to creditors
effect if ceiling is not raised - we default to creditors and the US government loses it bond rating and thus the dollar loses value
can you offer up any real solutions to this? if your solution is simply to cut spending, please name where these cuts will come from exactly and any affect positive or negative that this will have on both the economy and the american people.
Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Yea blame the Republicans for your guy being a dishonest hypocrite. That works for you sheep i guess. The rest of us just laugh though.
Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Obviously, the Republicans didn't think what he wanted would be a positive accomplishment. Duh.Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Yea blame the Republicans for your guy being a dishonest hypocrite. That works for you sheep i guess. The rest of us just laugh though.
I am not blaming Republicans..
I am blaming Obama for not recognizing what he had to deal with
Obama is not a hypocrite anymore than any other politician is a hypocrite.
I believe he truly wanted to make changes. He was niaive to the way things happen in wshington and thus why I saw him as too inexperienced to be President....and such niaivity was evident when he made such promises.
However, he entered the post and found that the only way he can govern properly is to play the game.
I commend him for putting aside his rosy glasses and doing what he needs to do to move this country forward.
I dont agree with what he believes will move this country forward, but at least he is putting aside his convictions to implement what he beleives is best.
Obama was naive to believe that once he became president that the Republicans would put aside their petty politics and work for what was best for the country.
What he found was an organized front to block anything that might be considered a positive accomplishment. He also found he had to deal with Republicans who are only interested in his defeat rather than helping the nation out of an economic crisis.
Wrong again Rabbi
Dems had a supermajority for only six months
Wrong again Rabbi
Dems had a supermajority for only six months
I'll repeat this:
Democrats pushed to eliminate funding for transferrig Gitmo prisoners to the mainland for trial. This is what Obama's signing statement was about.
What part did Republicans have in any of that?
Wrong again Rabbi
Dems had a supermajority for only six months
I'll repeat this:
Democrats pushed to eliminate funding for transferrig Gitmo prisoners to the mainland for trial. This is what Obama's signing statement was about.
What part did Republicans have in any of that?
The fearmongering part where they drove their faithful into a frenzy screaming "Obama is going to let terrorists loose in your neighborhood"