what I do know is that I wont be drawn into the world of the PC zombies like the left in here.
Guys like Rolling Thunder? Thinks there is a solution to anything and everything if the passion and effort is concerted enough..............
They were pressing for the state to widen the I-95 highway due to a terrible accident.
Asshats like Rolling Thunder and Old Rocks are all over that kind of shit. Its a neurological fcukk-up thing, but to them, the dynamic is, "Of course this is the right thing and the only thing to do. If it costs 1 billion and is over cost.............so be it!!"
......its called understanding the necessary tradeoffs in life. Something the liberal mind is incapable of doing. k00ks like Rolling Thunder, Chris and Old Rocks would be beyond appalled.
Rolling would happily buy a bag of dog doo for $1,000.00 a pop if it was packaged up just right!!!! ( since you're a homophobe s0n, I threw in the BOOBIES just for you!!!)
Man makes rules, mother nature has laws which we can`t change. Nature doesn`t give a rat`s ass what we want and that she does on occasion dish out the death penalty for being so stupid like parking on the shoulder of I-95 should not surprise anyone. Shit there are nice pullouts with all the facilities from one end of I-95 to the other one.
But that example nails the very pudding liberal mind are made off on the wall.
Wall...yes Westwall had asked every one of them to post a link to any one computer model, not just graphs or statements what these models supposedly calculated, ...
and now we have silence...
I had a lot of good laughs how "OldRocks" was trying to piece the "math" together quoting bits and pieces from "Wikipedia references" these glow ball models claim to incorporate, but in reality don`t....aside from quoting an equation from wiki to dazzle the reader there is never anything else behind it...
When real science publishes something on the net they do it in html format, (Hyper Text Markup Language) and the Hyper Text is simply a text superstructure which can link to a referenced base text with a quick mouse click...
But the stuff they read is not Hyper Text it is strictly Hyped up Text, and in that realm ASCII has nothing to do with "American Standard Code for Information Interchange" but has been degraded from Information Interchange to Information Intercourse and it sure worked on them...they have become totally "Intercoursed" in the head by this Hyped Text Markup Liberal Information Intercourse.
Anyways, I can tell You all what very definitely is not in these "climate fore cast models" as far as the math is concerned.
Math was always my favorite subject, naah even an obsession for my entire life.
And computers, well...for someone who is a math addict it`s like giving "Dirty Harry" an A 10 Warthog with a gatling gun...
So then let`s get the ammo belt and start a turkey shoot..
Radiative forcing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glow Ball "Climate math"...officially announced...For the case of a change in solar irradiance, the radiative forcing is the change in the solar constant divided by 4 and multiplied by 0.7 to take into account the geometry of the sphere and the amount of reflected sunlight.
multiply a "constant" by 2.8 and that "took care of the geometry of the earth"...
Just as a joke I`ll start out with the smaller mistakes first...
I like "knee capping" my victims before they finally get the mercy shot..:
Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To calculate the amount of sunlight reaching the ground, both the elliptical orbit of the Earth and the attenuation by the Earth's atmosphere have to be taken into account.
The extraterrestrial solar illuminance (Eext), corrected for the elliptical orbit by using the day number of the year (dn), is given by
Humor me please and click on the "Start" button lower left on Your display
On the popup click on "run"....then type in calc.exe , then on the OK button.
On the calculator which popped up click on "view" and then select Scientific
then set the little radio buttons so the ones for "Dec" and "Degrees" are black
let`s just run 2 sets, one for day #365 of the year and the second one for day# 4
Then click on the top right red C button to clear the calculator read window.
365 as the day number...
type in 362 click / then 365 then * 2* pi +1.033412
So before you proceed click on the red M+ button and store this number.
It should be 1.033211528
Then click on the top right red C button to clear the calculator read window.
Now we do day #4,...
so 4-3 only OldRocks would type that in, we just put in a 1 then *2 * the blue "pi" button then / 365 then on the left side click on the cosine button, after that + 1.033412 then click on =
You should have 1.033408658 ...don`t worry about more digits or the "E" factor on the left..after the cosine function was done the rest is linearly proportional and we are going to differentiate between day 4 and day 365...
Now click on this tiny red - sign which almost looks like a dot, after that click on the red RM button (recall memory) then click on =
and You should have 0.00019713 ....the rest of the digits we won`t care about, but just leave them where they are..
now click in *100/ then the red RM button
You should see 0.019713 ......expressed as percent difference of the Energy ...which we shall address just below here
So the difference in sunlight hitting the entire half of our planet is 0.019713 % absolute delta units of the E factor as we make one orbit around the sun...taking this equation to correct for the fact that we are not in a circular orbit..
Seem like sweet fuck all 0.01907 %......????
But You could say whenever you like to "OldRocks"
0.00019713 + 1 000 000/100 that`s a difference of 190.7 ppm
Like they are doing it with the ppm CO2 on the Mauna Lua Web site...
Trends in Carbon Dioxide
and that only changes by a few ppm not hundreds in one year as this does..
But before You get too generous with the figures You just calculated here consider that:
~ 191 ppm of 173 peta watts isn`t exactly "small change"
173* 191/1000000 * 1.0E+15 watt = 33389 *1.0*E+9 = 33 389 000 000 000 totally natural Watts so far that their Glow Ball "math" credits us CO2 sinners so far
and in terms of heat that`s 7 974 825 642 479 calories per second (cal/sec)
which can bring bring a river that has a flow rate of 8 860 917 cubic meters per second from a cold 10 C to the boiling point all day long without even breathing hard...
Now take a look how the "climatologists" trumpet when Manitoba Hydro dumps The Nelson river reservoirs into the Hudson Bay and the ice is gone for ~ 24 hours..as a comparison of these 191 ppm of 173 Peta watts..:
Nelson River - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It`s got a flow rate of 2370 cu. meters/second and is ~ +10...The Nelson River is a river of north-central North America, in the Canadian province of Manitoba. Its full length is 2,575 kilometres (1,600 mi), it has mean discharge of 2,370 cubic metres per second
so imagine what would happen to the Hudson Bay Ice if 3739 Rivers the size of the Nelson River would discharge scalding hot 100 deg C (=212 F) water EACH SECOND
before You let OldRocks or the likes have the figures you just calculated as if that`s just small change..!
And the 173 Peta Watt figure You got it from here if they ask You to back up your claim..:
Earth's energy budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But the global warmers simply used :
Radiative forcing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the case of a change in solar irradiance, the radiative forcing is the change in the solar constant divided by 4 and multiplied by 0.7 to take into account the geometry of the sphere and the amount of reflected sunlight.
Enough knee capping pot shots, lets go for the kill and pop one right into their water melon brains:
Because so far we have not even considered how much the received solar radiation energy decreases as we go up north from the equator...where the previous calculations have applied
And the math You just did gave so far You the numbers behind this "harmless little sentence" posted at Wikipedia:
But the seasonal and latitudinal distribution and intensity of solar radiation received at the Earth's surface also varies.[11] For example, at latitudes of 65 degrees the change in solar energy in summer & winter can vary by more than 25% as a result of the Earth's orbital variation. Because changes in winter and summer tend to offset, the change in the annual average insolation at any given location is near zero, but the redistribution of energy between summer and winter does strongly affect the intensity of seasonal cycles. Such changes associated with the redistribution of solar energy are considered a likely cause for the coming and going of recent ice ages (see: Milankovitch cycles).
And that`s what Glow Ball warming continues to downplay on every web page they have on the internet...so that other water melon brains start ridiculing everyone who mentions the Milankovitch cycles or natural seasonal solar energy variations...a whooping 25 % variation over and above the numbers we just cranked out
But now it gets way way more serious
All math and no pretty pictures might not turn everyone on the same it turns me on, so this picture should stimulate the desire to go for the kill shot with the math that follows..:
Picture description:
Two images showing the amount of reflected sunlight at southern and northern summer solstices respectively (watts / m²).
So You could just eyeball it from the color scale and walk away, or You could stay and y see how "Glow Ball scientists" water melon brains splatter with a 50 cal head shot..:
Here is another hint where this is going...:
Day length as a function of latitude and the day of the year
Don`t worry it`s not nearly as complicated as it looks at first glance...
If You are not familiar with Trig functions, don`t sweat it, they are easy to learn..:
Every carpenter is familiar with these and they are easy to understand..
If You start heading up north as You can see from the pictures above the angle at which the # or watts is distributed changes the # of watts per 1 squ meter by diluting it way down as the number of square meters You have to divide these watts by gos WAY UP
If You study this Trig Function picture just a few minutes and/or make a few pencil drawings along the math You will notice that it works like this..:
We know that at mid summer the maximum sun elevation angle at the North Pole is 23.5 degrees altitude, and we also know that the North Pole is 90 degrees Latitude...so...:
The number of square meters 1 original watts were when they were concentrated on 1 square meter have to be stretched out over...:
(sin (23.5+(90-latitude))^2 square meters...
so already before You step over the arctic circle which is at 66° 33′ 44″ (we just use 66.5 degrees) ...
the 1/(m^2) value changes to ...
clear your calculator...
then punch in 90-66.5+23.5 then hit the purple sin button, next hit the red MC button (clear memory) then hit the red M+ button then hit the * button, then hit the red MR (memory recall) button, then hit the = sign...and there You have it
at the edge of the arctic circle You only have 0.561 of the number of watts per 1 square meter you would have had at the equator
And I do know that this what follows here in fact so, because I have been in Iqaluit, Thule and CFS Alert for the better part of my professional life...
I have posted pictures here in this forum showing how we have to wear thick parkas in July on Ellesmere Island and on Greenland...
So now You can compare
New York 23.5+(90-40.75)=72.75 hit the "sin" function button then square that number and you have a reduction factor for New York as 0.912 at the very height of summer...NewYork is latitude ~40.75 degrees North...
Churchill= 23.5+(90-58.75)=54.75 solar factor= (sin (54.7))^2= 0.666 (all are summer)
Iqauluit ( 63 45)......................................................................... 0.586
Thule Greenland (77 30)..............................................................0.345
CFS Alert (82 deg 30 min North).................................................. 0.265
See how fast that energy drops...just to put it in a word perspective how little heat is
in the sun when you face it at a mid polar "summer day" while you "bask in the sun" in Iqaluit it "warms" you about the same as it does in New York on January first
And so far we only pitched only "calc.exe" which in turn resides as a microscopic spec on this "pea brain".....;
against the WATER MELON BRAIN ...
Just using single shot calc.exe it went way beyond a Turkey shoot...was the same as a 7 cm canon point blank Water Melon head shot..
imagine what happens if you set the trigger to full auto firing mode and the other little specs on "pea brain" start ripping with the other 2.5 giga bits per second WATER MELON BRAINS into bits
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoPq8QceeZA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoPq8QceeZA[/ame]
There are shit loads water melon brains, that have in their pity full little existence ever even been in Canada, never mind the high arctic where the flat earth "math" has the sun glaciers "melting at an alarming rate"...You do need to set Intel Extreme into full auto firing mode to take care of them...and I do have the programs, it was my job to write programs which "household" and power up stuff like that in the arctic..:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6NUk4UIw8M"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6NUk4UIw8M[/ame]
As if I`d be intimidated by some simpleton Glow Goofball "Wikipedia" equations, even using just an old fashioned slide rule would already be "overkill"
I noticed the Melon Heads have fled this thread and are now rolling around in a new one they spawned...like the fucking back shooting communist Partisan Schweinehunde which they are
But as I can see Waffen SS Oberscharf Fűhrer Skookerasbil is already on a Blitz Krieg offensive taking good care at the eastern front chasing the same old communist swines right back to Moose Cow while Feld Marschall Erwin Westwall Rommel is very capably handling the West.
Sieg Heil Kameraden
Last edited: