PK1
Gold Member
- Jun 26, 2015
- 3,904
- 529
- 140
------Apparently, you don't know what hypocrisy is, and take your "critical thinking" black/white simpleton mantras from your groupthink's conservative handbook.
I'm well aware of what hypocrisy is and my critical thinking isn't from any groupthink tank like your progressive liberal responses. It's pure Eagle which is obvious from your inability to cope with the current argument.
Of course bigots like yourself want to deny your own bigotry because they think they're morally superior.
Oh wait! Isn't that what progressives like yourself accuse the Christians and other religions of? I do believe it is!
Morality is about rational judgments. You don't have any? If you do, who are you to judge others? (your criticism)
I see... So now I have no morals because I want you to get out of everyone else's bedrooms.
I do believe that makes you four for four on the hypocrite list.
Moral behaviors,as one/group may judge, is often not related to a culture's laws. The more extreme examples should be, however, such as "do not kill, unless it's self-defense". Laws against end-of-life personal decisions are unethical.
Why should I accept your definition of morality?
Regarding your 3 scenarios, my focus was/is on the welfare of innocent offspring, not only on the adults who make uneducated or irresponsible decisions. To help protect innocent children & society overall, assisting these young/naive adults or teens in PLANNING for PARENTHOOD is a wise investment.
Now, about your 3 "choices" ...
The welfare of the offspring was covered when you became a hypocrite for not demanding that know carriers of genetic defects not be allowed to marry and reproduce.
1) Obviously, as i repeatedly said, my socially-responsible Libertarian morality advocates FULL freedom for adults UNLESS they victimize others (e.g., children).
Then demand that the government not allow carriers of known genetic defects to marry and reproduce or quit being a bigot and get out of everyone else's bedroom.
If they are poor, uneducated, irresponsible, then i believe gov's assistance is a good investment for society as a whole.
I thought you posted that people who reproduce were supposed to be prepared and take full responsibility for their children... Yep! You sure did back in post #134.
2) Legally, gov should leave loving couples alone with their reproductive plans (legal perspective), but morally, in my opinion, couples not genetically suitable (probability-wise) should take precautions to NOT victimize their offspring, and Planned Parenthood is an excellent resource for poor/uneducated women.
If they're supposed to be prepared and take FULL responsibility like you stated in post #134 then they don't need government assistance. So all you're proving here is that you're a hypocritical bigot.
3) Obviously, Planned Parenthood is a valuable resource for ALL citizens to help them take FULL responsibility with future child care. There's no "or" here. Black/White thinking in this case reflects financial/religious selfishness, an icon of conservative ideology.
.
Then get out of other people's bedrooms and quit violating the 14th Amendment or accept the fact that you are a hypocritical bigot who thinks he has to mind what other people do in their bedrooms because of that bigotry.
*****CHUCKLE*****
I no longer believe you are misinterpreting my comments & opinions about my view of morality; you are ignoring them. Instead, you are playing a broken record from your conservative political handbook. And you cannot propose your own definition of "morality"? Incompetent? Afraid? No independent thoughts?
I was very clear about my definition:
Morality represents "Live & Let Live" lifestyles and involves "social responsibility", which reflects the Golden Rule.
Also as mentioned repeatedly, i believe mature adults should be left alone to make their own decisions, but they should take FULL responsibility to care for their offspring if they ignore precautions or fail to abort their deformed embryos.
To aid prospective parents in making informed, rational decisions, EDUCATION is a valuable tool gov has to benefit society. Or, do you think gov should not provide free PUBLIC education to immature citizens?
Children feel bad if they are born with deformities, or would YOU enjoy being a mutant?
My ideas are rational & fair toward ALL kids and prospective babies.
Please learn the common meanings of words you twist from your con's bigot handbook.
Bigot = "a person whose habitual state of mind includes an irrational or unfair intolerance of ideas, opinions, ethnicities, or beliefs that differ from their own".
If i disagree with you and your group of cons, i have rational reasons for doing so.
So, please explain how my moral OPINIONS violate the 14th Amendment, while your accusation doesn't violate my rights to the 1st Amendment?
Here's another word you don't understand:
Hypocrisy = "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform".
I practice exactly what i advocate. How about you?
Like Unk, you can't even propose a definition of "morality"?