Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Banned
- #41
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's a flame thread. We get that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's a flame thread. We get that.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's wrong for people who are morally bankrupt to preach morals to those who actually have morals. Republicans need to look inward before they judge people from other countries, no matter how bad those people are. Look at what they did in Iraq. It was never about freedom. Never about the people. It was greed, pure and simple.
Republicans can't face their own leadership. Can't face what their party stands for. Point anything out to them and they deflect.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's wrong for people who are morally bankrupt to preach morals to those who actually have morals. Republicans need to look inward before they judge people from other countries, no matter how bad those people are. Look at what they did in Iraq. It was never about freedom. Never about the people. It was greed, pure and simple.
Republicans can't face their own leadership. Can't face what their party stands for. Point anything out to them and they deflect.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's a flame thread. We get that.
Yes, you and your little buddies have turned it into that...
Like I said, over your head.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's wrong for people who are morally bankrupt to preach morals to those who actually have morals. Republicans need to look inward before they judge people from other countries, no matter how bad those people are. Look at what they did in Iraq. It was never about freedom. Never about the people. It was greed, pure and simple.
Republicans can't face their own leadership. Can't face what their party stands for. Point anything out to them and they deflect.
We supported Saddam Hussein. We set the guy up in power. When it was convenient to have Iraq back us against Iran, Saddam was our friend.
The US has a history of supporting dictators when it serves our strategic interest, or the country has some resource we'd like to exploit.
How come we don't question the morality of that?
It's a flame thread. We get that.
Yes, you and your little buddies have turned it into that...
Like I said, over your head.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Yes, you and your little buddies have turned it into that...
Like I said, over your head.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Actually, it is based on reality.
Liberalism is destructive, and a large part of it's anomalous nature is the inability to provide a consistent moral code.
Consider this aspect: Liberal elites without said moral code.
Leftism is more than well-represented in the arts; it is dominated by same.
Leonard Bernstein, foremost musician of his time, witty and charming, but an prime example of the broken moral compass of the Leftist.
On January 14, 1970, Bernstein threw a fund-raising party for the violent, racist, America-hating Black Panther Party. Here is how Panther leader, “Field Marshall” Don Cox began the evening: “We call the [police] pigs… recognize that this country is the most oppressive country in the world, maybe in the history of the world. The pigs have the weapons and are ready to use them on the people…They are ready to commit genocide against those who stand up against them…” New York Magazine, June 8, 1970
Charles Murray's "Coming Apart" focuses on Liberal upper class folks who provide poor moral examples to the lower classes. They have children without benefit of marriage...and can get away with same because they have the wealth to provide a structure that paves over some of the rough spots that this behavior creates.
Lower class folks follow the example...but suffer the poverty and crime that the behavior engenders.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Actually, it is based on reality.
Liberalism is destructive, and a large part of it's anomalous nature is the inability to provide a consistent moral code.
Consider this aspect: Liberal elites without said moral code.
Leftism is more than well-represented in the arts; it is dominated by same.
Leonard Bernstein, foremost musician of his time, witty and charming, but an prime example of the broken moral compass of the Leftist.
On January 14, 1970, Bernstein threw a fund-raising party for the violent, racist, America-hating Black Panther Party. Here is how Panther leader, Field Marshall Don Cox began the evening: We call the [police] pigs recognize that this country is the most oppressive country in the world, maybe in the history of the world. The pigs have the weapons and are ready to use them on the people They are ready to commit genocide against those who stand up against them New York Magazine, June 8, 1970
Charles Murray's "Coming Apart" focuses on Liberal upper class folks who provide poor moral examples to the lower classes. They have children without benefit of marriage...and can get away with same because they have the wealth to provide a structure that paves over some of the rough spots that this behavior creates.
Lower class folks follow the example...but suffer the poverty and crime that the behavior engenders.
You make "liberalism" into something solid, which it isn't. All it means is someone's politics lean left. It's not a religion. That's so Ann Coulter to think so.
As for a moral code. Whether your politics lean left, right or center a moral code is personal.
Your entire argument is inflammatory, divisive and flawed. You've got a couple of anecdotes and you make a broad, sweeping generalization on an entire amorphous group of people with it.
Really, PC. I've seen you do much better debate than this. The one who sounds the most confused about what makes a "moral code" is you.
It's wrong for people who are morally bankrupt to preach morals to those who actually have morals. Republicans need to look inward before they judge people from other countries, no matter how bad those people are. Look at what they did in Iraq. It was never about freedom. Never about the people. It was greed, pure and simple.
Republicans can't face their own leadership. Can't face what their party stands for. Point anything out to them and they deflect.
We supported Saddam Hussein. We set the guy up in power. When it was convenient to have Iraq back us against Iran, Saddam was our friend.
The US has a history of supporting dictators when it serves our strategic interest, or the country has some resource we'd like to exploit.
How come we don't question the morality of that?
It is a bald-faced lie to say the US set up Saddam Hussein in power.
Too bad this thread was hijacked by trolls, it was a good op, PC, as usual.
And, as usual, went right over their heads.
It's a flame thread. We get that.
Yes, you and your little buddies have turned it into that...
Like I said, over your head.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Actually, it is based on reality.
Liberalism is destructive, and a large part of it's anomalous nature is the inability to provide a consistent moral code.
Consider this aspect: Liberal elites without said moral code.
.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Actually, it is based on reality.
Liberalism is destructive, and a large part of it's anomalous nature is the inability to provide a consistent moral code.
Consider this aspect: Liberal elites without said moral code.
Leftism is more than well-represented in the arts; it is dominated by same.
Leonard Bernstein, foremost musician of his time, witty and charming, but an prime example of the broken moral compass of the Leftist.
On January 14, 1970, Bernstein threw a fund-raising party for the violent, racist, America-hating Black Panther Party. Here is how Panther leader, Field Marshall Don Cox began the evening: We call the [police] pigs recognize that this country is the most oppressive country in the world, maybe in the history of the world. The pigs have the weapons and are ready to use them on the people They are ready to commit genocide against those who stand up against them New York Magazine, June 8, 1970
Charles Murray's "Coming Apart" focuses on Liberal upper class folks who provide poor moral examples to the lower classes. They have children without benefit of marriage...and can get away with same because they have the wealth to provide a structure that paves over some of the rough spots that this behavior creates.
Lower class folks follow the example...but suffer the poverty and crime that the behavior engenders.
You make "liberalism" into something solid, which it isn't. All it means is someone's politics lean left. It's not a religion. That's so Ann Coulter to think so.
As for a moral code. Whether your politics lean left, right or center a moral code is personal.
Your entire argument is inflammatory, divisive and flawed. You've got a couple of anecdotes and you make a broad, sweeping generalization on an entire amorphous group of people with it.
Really, PC. I've seen you do much better debate than this. The one who sounds the most confused about what makes a "moral code" is you.
The OP title is inflammatory. That appears to be over YOUR head.
Actually, it is based on reality.
Liberalism is destructive, and a large part of it's anomalous nature is the inability to provide a consistent moral code.
Consider this aspect: Liberal elites without said moral code.
.
Do you wake up every morning looking to warp history, logic and terminology to pick a fight in ascii PC?
~S~