Moore Accusers Could Face Criminal Charges

[Darkwind]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation.

I say lets the complaints be filed.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.

Provide evidence or shut up.

You first.

 

[Syriusly]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

 

[Darkwind]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

 

[Syriusly]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. .

Defamation is not a crime. Perjury is.

So lets look at the most lurid example- the woman who accuses Moore of molesting her when she was 14 years old.

Let's say Moore sues her for defamation. Both Moore and she can be called to the stand by either party- and anything that they say can be held against them if it is proven to be a) false and b) germane.

Moore as a very public personality has to show both that the allegations are a) false and b) with malicious intent. The accuser doesn't have to prove anything.

 

[Darkwind]

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. .

Defamation is not a crime. Perjury is.

So lets look at the most lurid example- the woman who accuses Moore of molesting her when she was 14 years old.

Let's say Moore sues her for defamation. Both Moore and she can be called to the stand by either party- and anything that they say can be held against them if it is proven to be a) false and b) germane.

Moore as a very public personality has to show both that the allegations are a) false and b) with malicious intent. The accuser doesn't have to prove anything.

Defamation is a tort offense.

"Defamation" is a catch-all term for any statement that hurts someone's reputation. Written defamation is called "libel," and spoken defamation is called "slander." Defamation is not a crime, but it is a "tort" (a civil wrong, rather than a criminal wrong). A person who has been defamed can sue the person who did the defaming. (For in-depth information on defamation claims, check out Nolo's Defamation, Libel & Slander section.)


Defamation Law Made Simple

You are simply incorrect. As the person bringing the charges, the women will be required to bring material evidence to back their accusations or face a perjury charge, or to recant the charges.

 

[Syriusly]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

 

[Darkwind]

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

Why would I care about what Trump is doing in a thread about Roy Moore and the 40-year-old accusations?

 

[Syriusly]

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. .

Defamation is not a crime. Perjury is.

So lets look at the most lurid example- the woman who accuses Moore of molesting her when she was 14 years old.

Let's say Moore sues her for defamation. Both Moore and she can be called to the stand by either party- and anything that they say can be held against them if it is proven to be a) false and b) germane.

Moore as a very public personality has to show both that the allegations are a) false and b) with malicious intent. The accuser doesn't have to prove anything.

Defamation is a tort offense.

"Defamation" is a catch-all term for any statement that hurts someone's reputation. Written defamation is called "libel," and spoken defamation is called "slander." Defamation is not a crime, but it is a "tort" (a civil wrong, rather than a criminal wrong). A person who has been defamed can sue the person who did the defaming. (For in-depth information on defamation claims, check out Nolo's Defamation, Libel & Slander section.)


Defamation Law Made Simple

You are simply incorrect. As the person bringing the charges, the women will be required to bring material evidence to back their accusations or face a perjury charge, or to recant the charges.

Defamation is not a crime- you are simply incorrect.

Gossip, Defamation & The Law — Why It’s Tough To Successfully Sue Gossip Publications | Internet Law Attorney

Anyone can sue anyone for defamation- as noted above it is a civil wrong- not a criminal wrong.

Lets look at your citation also
If you believe you are have been "defamed," to prove it you usually have to show there's been a statement that is all of the following:

• published
• false
• injurious
• unprivileged

Note- the person filing the lawsuit needs to show that the statement was false.

 

[Syriusly]

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

Why would I care about what Trump is doing in a thread about Roy Moore and the 40-year-old accusations?

Of course- why would you ever care about Trump dodging his defamation suit.

Which is about women accusing Trump of sexual assault- just like in Moore's case- and then Trump being sued for defamation.

Now according to you- Trump has to prove that he didn't defame the women. But in fact- the women have to prove that he did defame them.

 

[Darkwind]

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. .

Defamation is not a crime. Perjury is.

So lets look at the most lurid example- the woman who accuses Moore of molesting her when she was 14 years old.

Let's say Moore sues her for defamation. Both Moore and she can be called to the stand by either party- and anything that they say can be held against them if it is proven to be a) false and b) germane.

Moore as a very public personality has to show both that the allegations are a) false and b) with malicious intent. The accuser doesn't have to prove anything.

Defamation is a tort offense.

"Defamation" is a catch-all term for any statement that hurts someone's reputation. Written defamation is called "libel," and spoken defamation is called "slander." Defamation is not a crime, but it is a "tort" (a civil wrong, rather than a criminal wrong). A person who has been defamed can sue the person who did the defaming. (For in-depth information on defamation claims, check out Nolo's Defamation, Libel & Slander section.)


Defamation Law Made Simple

You are simply incorrect. As the person bringing the charges, the women will be required to bring material evidence to back their accusations or face a perjury charge, or to recant the charges.

Defamation is not a crime- you are simply incorrect.

Gossip, Defamation & The Law — Why It’s Tough To Successfully Sue Gossip Publications | Internet Law Attorney

Anyone can sue anyone for defamation- as noted above it is a civil wrong- not a criminal wrong.

Lets look at your citation also
If you believe you are have been "defamed," to prove it you usually have to show there's been a statement that is all of the following:

• published
• false
• injurious
• unprivileged

Note- the person filing the lawsuit needs to show that the statement was false.

I posted a legal definition of defamation. If you don't wish to believe it, that is your problem.

 

[Syriusly]

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. .

Defamation is not a crime. Perjury is.

So lets look at the most lurid example- the woman who accuses Moore of molesting her when she was 14 years old.

Let's say Moore sues her for defamation. Both Moore and she can be called to the stand by either party- and anything that they say can be held against them if it is proven to be a) false and b) germane.

Moore as a very public personality has to show both that the allegations are a) false and b) with malicious intent. The accuser doesn't have to prove anything.

Defamation is a tort offense.

"Defamation" is a catch-all term for any statement that hurts someone's reputation. Written defamation is called "libel," and spoken defamation is called "slander." Defamation is not a crime, but it is a "tort" (a civil wrong, rather than a criminal wrong). A person who has been defamed can sue the person who did the defaming. (For in-depth information on defamation claims, check out Nolo's Defamation, Libel & Slander section.)


Defamation Law Made Simple

You are simply incorrect. As the person bringing the charges, the women will be required to bring material evidence to back their accusations or face a perjury charge, or to recant the charges.

Defamation is not a crime- you are simply incorrect.

Gossip, Defamation & The Law — Why It’s Tough To Successfully Sue Gossip Publications | Internet Law Attorney

Anyone can sue anyone for defamation- as noted above it is a civil wrong- not a criminal wrong.

Lets look at your citation also
If you believe you are have been "defamed," to prove it you usually have to show there's been a statement that is all of the following:

• published
• false
• injurious
• unprivileged

Note- the person filing the lawsuit needs to show that the statement was false.

I posted a legal definition of defamation. If you don't wish to believe it, that is your problem.

You posted lots of crap. You said that defamation was a crime- and then went ahead and shared a citation that showed your claim to be bullshit.

And then I posted more from the very article you cited- showing that the rest of what you claimed is also bullshit.

 

[protectionist]

Trump and GOP will accept a child molester in their party as long as billionaires get tax cuts. Can there be a grosser reason to sell your soul?

I never heard of Trump or the GOP accepting a child molester in their party (and neither have you)

I have heard of Trump accepting an accused child molester in his party. And so have you.

No you haven't , and you know it.

 

[protectionist]

Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.

Provide evidence or shut up.

You first.

I don't, need to, first or last. Only accusers have that burden.

 

[protectionist]

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

Why would I care about what Trump is doing in a thread about Roy Moore and the 40-year-old accusations?

Of course- why would you ever care about Trump dodging his defamation suit.

Which is about women accusing Trump of sexual assault- just like in Moore's case- and then Trump being sued for defamation.

Now according to you- Trump has to prove that he didn't defame the women. But in fact- the women have to prove that he did defame them.

Which they failed to do.

 

[Syriusly]

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

Why would I care about what Trump is doing in a thread about Roy Moore and the 40-year-old accusations?

Of course- why would you ever care about Trump dodging his defamation suit.

Which is about women accusing Trump of sexual assault- just like in Moore's case- and then Trump being sued for defamation.

Now according to you- Trump has to prove that he didn't defame the women. But in fact- the women have to prove that he did defame them.

Which they failed to do.

No- they haven't had an opportunity to do so- because Trump and his lawyers are busy trying to prevent the case from coming to court.

As you said- 'everyone has the right to face their accusers'- just that Trump doesn't believe that.

 

[Syriusly]

Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.

Provide evidence or shut up.

You first.

I don't, need to, first or last. Only accusers have that burden.

Trump accused the women of lying.

So you agree that Trump has the burden to prove that they are lying- right?

 

[Syriusly]

Trump and GOP will accept a child molester in their party as long as billionaires get tax cuts. Can there be a grosser reason to sell your soul?

I never heard of Trump or the GOP accepting a child molester in their party (and neither have you)

I have heard of Trump accepting an accused child molester in his party. And so have you.

No you haven't , and you know it.

Yep- Roy Moore is accused of sexually molesting a 14 year old child- and Trump has not only accepted the accused child molester into his party- he has urged voters to vote for the accused child molester.

 

[protectionist]

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Of course, they do. Defamation and perjury are still crimes. Everyone has the right to face their accusers. It is how it works in this country and the burden falls on the accusers 100% of the time.

I hope this does end up in court. It will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Trump of course is fighting like hell to avoid having to go to court
Trump’s Female Accusers Feel Forgotten. A Lawsuit May Change That.

They would have to prove their charge. They can't.

 

[protectionist]

And it is parallel how?

Oh because you have accused the accusers of lying.

Do you have proof that they are lying?

No- but that doesn't stop you from accusing them of lying.

It's one thing to go around blabbing something in the street. It's another to be faced with years in prison for what you say (under oath in a courtroom)

Yep- I look forward to Moore's lawsuit - where he would have to testify in court- and be faced with years in prison for what he says.

Just Moore, not the accusers? you see, they will be required to provide proof of their accusation..

Nope- they are not required to prove anything.

They are making accusations against a public figure.

And it is his word against theirs- glad to see them all on the stand. Every single one of them.

Any plaintiff in a lawsuit is required to prove their charge. These women may not care about winning a case. They may be looking to score money from a book deal, a movie, or a payoff just to go away.