Moore Accusers Could Face Criminal Charges

Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.
Provide evidence or shut up.
Provide evidence they were lying.

Or shut up.
They are the accusers. The burden is on them, not the accused.

Actually there is no burden on either the accuser or the accused to prove anything.

But it is fascinating that the Right believes women shouldn't be able to accuse their attackers unless they can 'prove' they were attacked.

So if your daughter gets her boobs grabbed by her manager in the backroom at the restaurant she works at- she better not say anything to anyone about it- unless it was caught on camera.
It is interesting that you believe that anyone is guilty unless proven innocent... How many lives can be ruined by unsubstantiated accusations for the purpose of getting even for just the smallest slight; real or perceived?

But you are wrong. The burden of proof lays on the accuser, never on the accused.
 
The Corrupt Democratic Party's smear campaigns are lowest form of politics.

Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.
Provide evidence or shut up.
Provide evidence they were lying.

Or shut up.
They are the accusers. The burden is on them, not the accused.

Actually there is no burden on either the accuser or the accused to prove anything.

But it is fascinating that the Right believes women shouldn't be able to accuse their attackers unless they can 'prove' they were attacked.

So if your daughter gets her boobs grabbed by her manager in the backroom at the restaurant she works at- she better not say anything to anyone about it- unless it was caught on camera.
It is interesting that you believe that anyone is guilty unless proven innocent... How many lives can be ruined by unsubstantiated accusations for the purpose of getting even for just the smallest slight; real or perceived?

But you are wrong. The burden of proof lays on the accuser, never on the accused.

You are wrong. This is not a court of law. Also when a man runs on values then we have every right to see how he runs his life. There is corroboration and to suggest they are lying you have to prove that 40 years ago they knew Moore would be running for the Senate.
 
Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.
Provide evidence or shut up.
Provide evidence they were lying.

Or shut up.
They are the accusers. The burden is on them, not the accused.

Actually there is no burden on either the accuser or the accused to prove anything.

But it is fascinating that the Right believes women shouldn't be able to accuse their attackers unless they can 'prove' they were attacked.

So if your daughter gets her boobs grabbed by her manager in the backroom at the restaurant she works at- she better not say anything to anyone about it- unless it was caught on camera.
It is interesting that you believe that anyone is guilty unless proven innocent....

It is interesting that you believe that no girl should accuse anyone unless she have physical evidence that someone grabbed her pussy.
 
Provide evidence or shut up.
Provide evidence they were lying.

Or shut up.
They are the accusers. The burden is on them, not the accused.

Actually there is no burden on either the accuser or the accused to prove anything.

But it is fascinating that the Right believes women shouldn't be able to accuse their attackers unless they can 'prove' they were attacked.

So if your daughter gets her boobs grabbed by her manager in the backroom at the restaurant she works at- she better not say anything to anyone about it- unless it was caught on camera.
It is interesting that you believe that anyone is guilty unless proven innocent....

It is interesting that you believe that no girl should accuse anyone unless she have physical evidence that someone grabbed her pussy.
Perhaps you should try to make some sense?

When have I ever defended Trump?
 
Start filing complaints, both criminal and civil against these accusers. Not only Moore, but everyone accused of such wrongdoing. Take these cases into a court where the allegations have to be proved.
 
Provide evidence they were lying.

Or shut up.
They are the accusers. The burden is on them, not the accused.

Actually there is no burden on either the accuser or the accused to prove anything.

But it is fascinating that the Right believes women shouldn't be able to accuse their attackers unless they can 'prove' they were attacked.

So if your daughter gets her boobs grabbed by her manager in the backroom at the restaurant she works at- she better not say anything to anyone about it- unless it was caught on camera.
It is interesting that you believe that anyone is guilty unless proven innocent....

It is interesting that you believe that no girl should accuse anyone unless she have physical evidence that someone grabbed her pussy.
Perhaps you should try to make some sense?

When have I ever defended Trump?

When did I mention Trump?
 
Alabama is a state that is nearly dead last in per capita income. The state refuses to protect its citizens as they are maimed and killed in factories located in Alabama. States like Alabama would be in big trouble if California or NY were kicked out. States like NY and California pay more in taxes to the federal government than they receive while Alabama receives more than they pay in taxes to the federal government. In other words Alabama is a welfare state. They get money from the federal government and it comes from California and NY.
People in California and New York are ALREADY in financial trouble because of the taxes they have to pay. Better to not have to pay those taxes, and all to live in a state that "refuses to protect its citizens" by having moronic gun laws, keeping people unarmed and defenseless. In NYC, they aren't even allowed to carry so much as a pepper spray. Pathetic.

As for all the tax money they get in Cal and NY, what good is that when they let in millions of illegal alien foreigner who swamp their budgets. Old story - in 1974, NYC mayor Abe Beame went to Washington DC begging the feds to bail New York out.

And why did they need this bailout ? Because they gave welfare $$ to ANYONE from anywhere with an outstretched hand. while other states had restrictions. President Ford refused to see Beame, and Beame wound up leaving the White House in a huff.
 
Last edited:
Alabama is a state that is nearly dead last in per capita income. The state refuses to protect its citizens as they are maimed and killed in factories located in Alabama. States like Alabama would be in big trouble if California or NY were kicked out. States like NY and California pay more in taxes to the federal government than they receive while Alabama receives more than they pay in taxes to the federal government. In other words Alabama is a welfare state. They get money from the federal government and it comes from California and NY.
People in California and New York are ALREADY in financial trouble because of the taxes they have to pay. Better to not have to pay those taxes, and all to live in a state that "refuses to protect its citizens" by having moronic gun laws, keeping people unarmed and defenseless. In NYC, they aren't even allowed to carry so much as a pepper spray. Pathetic.

As for all the tax money they get in Cal and NY, what good is that when they let in millions of illegal alien foreigner who swamp their budgets. Old story - in 1974, NYC mayor Abe Beame went to Washington DC begging the feds to bail New York out.

And why did they need this bailout ? Because they gave welfare $$ to ANYONE from anywhere with an outstretched hand. while other states had restrictions. President Ford refused to see Beame, and Beame wound up leaving the White House in a huff.

California and NY get less than what their taxpayers pay to Washington while Alabama gets more money back from the federal government than they pay in. There is no bailout.
 
Alabama is a state that is nearly dead last in per capita income. The state refuses to protect its citizens as they are maimed and killed in factories located in Alabama. States like Alabama would be in big trouble if California or NY were kicked out. States like NY and California pay more in taxes to the federal government than they receive while Alabama receives more than they pay in taxes to the federal government. In other words Alabama is a welfare state. They get money from the federal government and it comes from California and NY.
People in California and New York are ALREADY in financial trouble because of the taxes they have to pay. Better to not have to pay those taxes, and all to live in a state that "refuses to protect its citizens" by having moronic gun laws, keeping people unarmed and defenseless. In NYC, they aren't even allowed to carry so much as a pepper spray. Pathetic.

As for all the tax money they get in Cal and NY, what good is that when they let in millions of illegal alien foreigner who swamp their budgets. Old story - in 1974, NYC mayor Abe Beame went to Washington DC begging the feds to bail New York out.

And why did they need this bailout ? Because they gave welfare $$ to ANYONE from anywhere with an outstretched hand. while other states had restrictions. President Ford refused to see Beame, and Beame wound up leaving the White House in a huff.

ANd so you want to compare the fiscal status of Alabama and California and New York ? OK. I'll play that game with you. Check the >>
State Fiscal Rankings of George Mason University's Mercatus Center .. >>

Alabama - 12

New York - 39

New Jersey - 50

California - 43

And Obama's liberal home state of Illinois ? - 49

And my home state (Florida) ? - Number 1 in the nation.

State Fiscal Rankings
 
California and NY get less than what their taxpayers pay to Washington while Alabama gets more money back from the federal government than they pay in. There is no bailout.

California and NY SHOULD get less. They cause their own miserable financial condition by letting in millions of foreigners (most illegal), providing them sanctuary, welfare of all sorts, etc.

California also has another big problem. It is a natural disaster area. Earthquakes anytime, fires all summer, floods and mudslides all winter.
 
Not as creepy as a religious nut who gropes 14 year old girls, or the idiots who support him.
Let us know when you have any evidence of that. So far, only evidence you present is that you judge without evidence.

People who support Moore are people who support >> innocent unless PROVEN guilty. :biggrin:
 
Please, please sue and bring it into a court of law.

Suing is a Civil process not a criminal one. There are no 5th Amendment protections in a civil suit (unless their are also criminal charges) which means Moore can be put on the stand and questioned under oath.


Oh Gawd, please sue.
So what if he was questioned under oath ?
 
Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.
Provide evidence or shut up.
The difference is that the Clintons have been investigated for 30 years and no crime. When Moore is as intensely investigated then you can make a comparison.
The Clintons have killed dozens of people, for which not only has there been no formal govt. investigation, there hasn't even been much talk about it, with the liberal media on their side, and conservastives fearing Clinton organized crime connection. There is some sources though. Here's a very good one, complete with color photos of the many victims, >>

THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

JohnAshe.jpg


John Ashe
Former United Nations General Assembly President
Died: June 22, 2016


ronbrown.jpg


Ron Brown
Former Chairman, DNC; Commerce Secretary
Died: May 3, 1996
 
Great idea. Add false prosecution to Moore's long list of scumbag behaviors.
Provide evidence or shut up.
The difference is that the Clintons have been investigated for 30 years and no crime. When Moore is as intensely investigated then you can make a comparison.
The Clintons have killed dozens of people, for which not only has there been no formal govt. investigation, there hasn't even been much talk about it, with the liberal media on their side, and conservastives fearing Clinton organized crime connection. There is some sources though. Here's a very good one, complete with color photos of the many victims, >>

THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

JohnAshe.jpg


John Ashe
Former United Nations General Assembly President
Died: June 22, 2016


ronbrown.jpg


Ron Brown
Former Chairman, DNC; Commerce Secretary
Died: May 3, 1996

Imagine that. Only the crazy web sites are reporting that. I wonder why?
 
Imagine that. Only the crazy web sites are reporting that. I wonder why?
3 young men in good health, all Clinton aides scheduled to testify against the Clintons, and they all die separately, with 3 days of each other. Wanna tell us it's a coincidence ? And then we'll tell you how crazy you are.

Not getting confused with the FACTS are you ?

Ron Brown died along with 39 other people when the T-43 (a converted 737 used by the Air Force) carrying the group on a trip to Bosnia crashed while approaching the Dubrovnik airport. On the verge of being indicted and having stated publicly his willingness to make a deal with prosecutors, Ron Brown's death brought to an end his ability to testify. The very next day, Ron Brown's personal lawyer was murdered in a drive-by shooting. A few days later, the Air Traffic Controller who had been in charge during the aircraft crash was found dead and declared a suicide.

On leaving Ron Brown's funeral, President Bill Clinton was seen laughing and joking ... until he saw the camera, then he went into his sad act!

clinton.gif


www.whatreallyhappened.com THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

No, you can't use the INVALIDATION CARD on this one.
 
I agree. Let's get these woman under oath where they will have to show their evidence.
Exactly. It's a parallel to the Michael Brown shooting case, where Brown sympathizers lied initially, but when supeoned and brought to court, and faced with prison time for perjury, they came clean, and recanted their earlier lies. Consequently, Darrin Wilson was acquitted, and not even brought to trial.
 
Friday, November 17
Race/Topic (Click to Sort)
Poll Results Spread
Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Gravis Jones 47, Moore 42 Jones +5
President Trump Job Approval Harvard-Harris Approve 41, Disapprove 59 Disapprove +18
President Trump Job Approval Rasmussen Reports Approve 42, Disapprove 56 Disapprove +14
Direction of Country Harvard-Harris Right Direction 30, Wrong Track 58 Wrong Track +28
Thursday, November 16
Race/Topic (Click to Sort)
Poll Results Spread
Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones FOX News Jones 50, Moore 42 Jones +8

RealClearPolitics - 2017 Latest Polls

The proper justice appears on the horizon for that super hypocrite Roy Moore.
October 2016 poll - Hillary Clinton 56......Donald Trump 44 :biggrin:
 

Forum List

Back
Top