JoeB131
Diamond Member
for it to be purgery it has to be intragal to the case.
Lying about consentual sex is NOT intragal to a case of abuse.
First, I think before you try to make legal arguments, it helps to know how to spell the words you are using. I've bolded the ones you got wrong.
Second, I think that you really need to look up what the rules are on such things in the workplace today. Most CEO's or Managers would have been fired for what Clinton did. Other politicians of both parties have resigned for far less.
Third, the Violence Against Women Act of 1993 did allow for "pattern of Conduct" evidence to be admited into sexual harrassment, rape and sexual abuse trials. In short, what he did elsewhere is germaine to the fact he as a manager created a hostile work environment.
Now, again. I think this is a really stupid area of law.
But it's an area of law that the CLintons and liberal have been advocating imposing on businesses for years.